Preview

How Did The Weimar Republic Have Too Much Power In Germany

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Weimar Republic Have Too Much Power In Germany
The era between World War I (1914-1918) and World War II (1939-1945) was considered as one of the most unstable period in world’s history. Europe faced after the First World War an entirely new stage, devastation was a massive issue and found almost everywhere after war and after the loss of three important empires: the German, the Ottoman, and the Austria-Hungarian empires. Viewing the political map of Europe shortly after World War I it is noticeable that there were only two countries with no democracy in 1919, those two countries were the Soviet Union and Hungary. The situation was different in 1939 and not really comparable, because in 1939 there were only a few countries or nations with a parliamentary government. France, Britain, Switzerland, Belgium, and Scandinavian countries are …show more content…
The “old” German empire reached to an end when its significant personalities agreed on “a revolution from above” 1, as the Foreign Minister of Germany Paul von Hintze was convinced to try to prevent a revolution in Russian manner. It is essential to take a closer look at the constitution of 1919 while analyzing why the Weimar Republic failed and why Adolf Hitler became the chancellor. The position of the “Reichspräsident” that was created had way too much power. This leader position could break down the Reichstag with Article 25 that says, “the president of the Reich may dissolve the Reichstag, but only once for the same cause”(wiki). Furthermore he had the authority to suspend some basic rights in order to create his “personal” vision of the public order and security. Another article in the constitution that underlines the competences is article 48, which basically says that the “Reichspräsident” can govern even without the parliament. These articles demonstrate the power and influence that the “Reichspräsident” had and a consequence of distrust against political and liberal parties in the pre war period.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After World War I, Europe struggles to return to peace and stability. Many new democratic governments fell apart under the attack of the Great Depression. As a result, new totalitarian regimes emerged such as Fascism and Communism. Totalitarian is a relating system of governments that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state. By making the most out of new technologies of mass communications, dictators were able to gain support of their populations. Europe's inability to deal with economic depression and the political movements lead to World War II. People lost faith in capitalism and then turned to a new system of government called fascism, which contributed to economic issues, political movements and dictatorship.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Wiemar constitution it allows for the president to make decisions when there is an emergency in the country. When the stock market crashed in 1929 the United States, who was a big backer of money in Germany, pulled their money out of the German economy it sent the country into panic and some confusion. The Reichstag fell into gridlock and the president of Germany took control by exercising the emergency power clause in the Wiemar Constitution. President Hindenburg appointed temporary chancellors which both failed to control what was going on in their country which led Germans to look alternatively for answers and some started voting for the Nazi splinter group. While numbers of Nazi in the government began to rise people started noticing one of their members Adolph Hitler as a man…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Ww1 Changed Europe

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The political changes effected by WW1 were reflected in the fall of many of Europe’s monarchies. While the Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire completely collapse, the Great War was also responsible for the dismantling of monarchies in Germany and Russia, which became republics. WW1 was also the reason for…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As World War I came to a conclusion, the German people faced an inherent complication: what was to be the future of Germany? Democracy was a paltry response to such a climactic part of history. The Weimar Republic not only deteriorated the already feeble nation, but became a mixing pot for the future of the Third Reich. Once the previous leaders of the Weimar Republic conceded defeat, Adolf Hitler rose in his ranks until he accepted his position as Führer on August 1st, 1921 for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. They pushed through many different trials and victories, and finally became chancellor on January 30th, 1933.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite elements of democracy, with the Kaiser at the Head of the Constitution and holding such significant powers, Wilhelminian Germany was clearly structured to maintain authority and keep the power concentrated at the top. The issue is whether or not in practice the state was totally authoritarian and how far Germany was stuck in authoritarianism, or in other words; how much potential for advancement towards democracy there was. It also needs to be established what is meant by an 'authoritarian state' as the Kaiser's power can be seen in the reflection of other powers; the Kaiser was the head of the army & appointed the Chancellor, therefore the authoritarianism & power of these two can be seen to reflect the authoritarianism & power of the Kaiser.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After World War I, European countries were devastated. Europeans were disappointed in their old governments; they felt that they had failed them by causing the war and catapulting them into a depression. Destroyed, they turned away from democratic governments and supported communism and fascism simply to avoid democracy. Others were intellectually lost and desperate for leadership. The government encouraged the people’s support by instilling irrational fears amongst their citizens and promising to free them from it. Once the governments had gained support, people began to see the power that their authoritarian governments had gained. Their desire to have a strong and united nation took control and the motivation to support an authoritarian…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Second Reich constitution, it is clear that during the years of the Second Reich there was no democracy. The German Electorates could only elect the Reichstag, which had little power. The Reichstag was only able to accept or reject the laws that were proposed by the government and veto treaties agreed by the Kaiser. However, the Kaiser was able to summon and dissolve the Reichstag at any given time. Therefore most of the time the Reichstag would agree with Kaiser, which shows Kaiser Absolutism. This was similar for the Imperial Government. The Chancellor and the Cabinet did the day-to-day running of the Germany. However, at any given time the German Emperor was able to dismiss the Chancellor. Therefore at the end if something was not going according to Kaisers' vision for Germany he has the power to change so.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent do the weaknesses of Weimar democracy explain Hitler’s rise to power in 1933?…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the First World War, Europe was the world center of industry and capital. Massive death, destruction, and resentment after World War I left most countries unable to recover to a normal existence and damaged the world economy. The economic collapse and the political instability caused by World War I eventually led to the rise of fascism in Europe. Forceful dictators in Italy, Germany, and Japan took advantage of these problems to seize power by territorial expansion. These events caused a major repositioning of world power and influence. This paper traces a variety of significant factors and forces that contributed to the outbreak of World War II.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They are many reasons why people thought the Weimar Republic was bound to fail from the start, especially when it was set up in 1919 after the First World War in which Germany had suffered a humiliating defeat and the German Revolution of 1918-19 which overthrew the Kaiser. Named after the city of Weimar where the new constitution was written, it introduced democracy to Germany and a new untested system of government lasting until January 1933 when Adolf Hitler seized power and was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite having a Reichstag and various political parties within, showing different views, the country was still essentially run by the Kaiser. The Kaiser had the power to summon the Reichstag and dismiss it when he pleased, this clearely caused unrest as in spite of there being a government, and Wilhelm II had overruling authority. Again, as well as controlling the fate of the Reichstag, the Kaiser was also the one whom appointed the chancellors and all government ministers and it was these ministers who would propose legislation for the two houses of parliament. So from this we can see, despite not directly controlling the state through political decisions made by him, he could decide who he wanted as chancellor and when he wished to dismiss them. An example of this was Von Caprivi, the chancellor appointed in 1890 taking over from Von Bismarck, he let the Kaiser know that if appointed he would be compliant, possibly why he was chosen as then Whilhelm would have effortless ruling. However, showing again that it is an authoritarian state, and somewhat dictatorial, the Kaiser removed Caprivi as he felt he was too progressive. Caprivi wanted a cooperative Reichstag and to be…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following World War I, the entire globe started to see the emergence of new totalitarian regimes. Whether it was due to the lack of leadership within a country, the people wanting change in economy, or new candidates becoming prominent, there were many different leaders throughout rising governments. Countries such as Germany, Italy, Japan, and the Soviet Union all had new elected officials within their totalitarian governments for one reason or another in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Adolf Hitler rose to power in Germany following World War I due to citizens within the country wanting change.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Third Reich

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Nazi rise to power brought an end to the Weimar Republic, a parliamentary democracy established in Germany after World War I. Following the appointment of Adolf Hitler as chancellor on January 30, 1933, the Nazi state (also referred to as the Third Reich) quickly became a regime in which Germans enjoyed no guaranteed basic rights. After a suspicious fire in the Reichstag (the German Parliament), on February 28, 1933, the government issued a decree which suspended constitutional civil rights and created a state of emergency in which official decrees could be enacted without parliamentary confirmation.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays