Preview

How Did The Watergate Scandal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Watergate Scandal
On June 17, 1972, the U.S. had one of the biggest lies in the history of the White House. President Richard Nixon did some scandalous things to the other party to ensure his reelection. This was known as the Watergate Scandal. President Nixon and his committee took an aggressive approach to their campaign. During his final months before the reelection was to take place, he felt threatened by the opposing democratic party. Richard Nixon and his committee came up with a scheme to cheat their way to winning the election. This scandal goes to show that people will lie and cheat to get what they want, no matter how honest they claim to be or have been in the past. There is no doubt that this scandal is true, not only because of all the evidence …show more content…
There were many confidential documents taken from the headquarters. The night of the break in, they successfully wiretapped the building and got documents used to exploit the democrats. The wiretapping ended up not being successful and did not work as planned. “So on June 17 a group of five men returned to the Watergate building...”(United States), with a new microphone to replace the faulty ones. During this second break in, they were caught red handed by Frank Wills while implanting the second round of wiretapping devices. Wills was a 24-year-old security guard who worked for the Watergate Headquarters. On that day of June 17, he noticed a door had been taped shut to prevent it from locking. He, …” removed the tape, but when he passed by ten minutes later a new piece had been put on” (The Washington Post). He then called the cops who showed up shortly after and caught all five of them behind a desk in one of the offices. The spies were arrested for serious crimes such as burglary, conspiracy and violations, and were sentenced to prison. The men, took cash along with some documents that ended up not being very serious. The documents taken were mostly of financial reports. The five men arrested were James McCord, Bernard Barker, Virgilio Gonzales, Eugenio Martinez, and Frank Sturgis. James McCord was a former …show more content…
The five guys who were arrested and hired by the president, told Nixon they needed $120,000 as blackmail money. In a White House meeting, President Nixon declared that “…John W. Dean III [has] no choice but to come up with $120,000…” (The Washington Post). Nixon tried to cover this meeting up, when 46 presidential conversations about Watergate were released by saying that he first learned about the hush money in March and thought they were wrong. The investigation continued, even throughout the reelection. The reelection had, “…the lowest turnout since 1948…”, with only 55 percent of the electoral voting. Nixon carried all the states except for Massachusetts. He completely swept out his competitors, but not for long. After about three months of being reelected, Nixon gets caught taping his conversations and calls from his office. He then refused to give the tapes up leading to a new investigation, known as the Nixon Tapes. The tapes turned out to be evidence of Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate break-in. The Judiciary Committee than began the impeachment process against Nixon due to his role in the former misconducts. Before the House could vote against the impeachment charges against Nixon, the President resigned. Though he repeatedly claimed, “I’m not a crook”, he made it very clear by his resignation and secrecy that he played a part of these many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Amongst other crimes, Nixon had his aides spy on, sabotage, burglarize and steal in order to fight the Democratic candidates for Re-election. In 1972, one team got caught while breaking in the Watergate office building to replace a malfunctioning bug they had installed…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On June 17 1972 a security guard named Frank Wills had alerted authorities that there was a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate. The Watergate is a complex which has offices, hotel, and apartments. Five men were arrested for breaking into the Watergate complex. They were found with cash, and electronic surveillance equipment. The men were caught while attempting to wiretap phones and steal secret information. It is unknown if Nixon was aware of the heist, however it is known of his attempts to cover it up.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Watergate Dbq

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During Richard Nixon’s term of U.S Presidency, he was part of a series of scandals called The Watergate Scandals. The scandals began with the arrest of five men for breaking and entering into the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate Office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972. Investigations conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and later by the Senate Watergate Committee, House Judiciary Committee and the press revealed that this burglary was one of many illegal activities authorized and carried out by Nixon's staff. They also revealed the immense scope of crimes and abuses, which included campaign fraud, political espionage and sabotage, illegal break-ins, improper tax audits, illegal wiretapping on a massive scale, and a secret slush fund laundered in Mexico to pay those who conducted these operations. This secret fund was also used as hush money to buy silence of the seven men who were indicted for the June 17 break-in.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nixon was a president during the late 60’s early 70’s. He was a president who had good private morality, but not so much public morality. This flaw made him quite paranoid and Nixon felt he needed information to be on top. Nixon also made great world changing decisions without the advice or interference of Congress. When Nixon went the extremes of using government to wiretap without the congress’s or court’s approval Congress was not happy. This was the beginning of bad…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the year of 1972; there was a break-in at the Democratic National Convention headquarters. This event became known as Watergate. Richard Nixon’s administration attempted to cover-up its involvement in the scandal. W. Mark Felt, known in this investigation as Deep Throat was a secret source, insider and informant in the happenings of the Watergate Scandal. Felt was a FBI agent who had the sources and internal means to help discover the internal spies, secret surveillance, and tricky cover ups…Hence the name given to Nixon; Tricky Dick. Speculated by Nixon as an informant, Felt was never discovered and went on to hold his secret identity for 30 plus years. The tape recorders that were in question in this scandal were installed and maintained by the U.S. Secret Service. Recordings of President Nixon and cohorts were caught discussing several different issues unknown to the public. “The senate hearings mesmerized the nation and they were covered by television gavel to gavel. By…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Watergate scandal was the first of its kind in United Stated history. The scandal…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S V. Nixon Essay

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The scandal started when five burglars were caught breaking into the Watergate Hotel in Washington D.C. which was serving as the Democratic National Committee Headquarters in 1972. During the congressional hearings about the break-in scandal, it was found that President Nixon had a tape-recording device installed in the Oval Office. The tapes were wanted by the special prosecutor in charge of the case. Nixon then had the prosecutor removed from his job. The next prosecutor also requested to see the tapes. A federal court judge then stepped in and stated that President Nixon had to hand over the tapes recordings. In response to this, the President released shortened and edited versions of the tapes. However, these weren’t good enough to meet the court order. The President was ordered by the United States District Court to hand over the complete tapes. The special prosecutor then requested the Supreme Court to hear the case and help settle the issue. Before the Supreme Court, Nixon’s lawyers argued that the tapes were protected by the President’s executive privilege and that the President can determine if they can be released to the public or to the other branches of government. However, the Department of Justice argued that Nixon could be using executive privilege to cover up his information about illegal activities. The Department of Justice also stated that this could be a…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I read through “Breaking into Watergate” I found it a very interesting read. Based on the knowledge I knew about the Watergate scandal and what I have read in the opening section of the chapter, I did not know a lot. The author presented a great summary on what actually happened during court trails as well as confessions and how the court figured out that Nixon was a part of the whole thing. The author’s main focus on this chapter was about evidence and tape recordings. Tape recordings made it possible to figure out the verdict of the Watergate Scandal. The writer of this document made it clear that there were many points about this subject. One of the points being, without tape recording evidence, it would have not been possible to catch the criminal behind the scenes. Another main point that the author makes is that, even though the evidence is there for the Nixon case, there are still things being left out. At the end of the reading the author mentions questions like, “If the tapes confirm what we already know, why get so excited?” as well as “What is left for the tapes to tell?” With those questions in mind that brings up another valid point, should the tapes be valid enough to prove that Nixon is guilty? These main points that author makes play a big part in the Watergate scandal and the main points being: how additional evidence is necessary, what is being left out with the evidence provided, and is it enough evidence to convict Nixon.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Watergate Scandal

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While doing his rounds at the Watergate Hotel in the early morning of June 17, 1972, security guard Frank Wills found a door, located between the basement stairwell and the parking garage, that was being prevented from latching by a piece of tape. He removed the tape and continued his rounds. Returning to the same spot later, he discovered that someone had re-taped the door. His curiosity now aroused, he called the police. Around 2:30 a.m., after the police arrived, five men, wearing business suits and latex gloves, were arrested in the offices of the Democratic National Committee. The men had been repairing wiretapping equipment and, according to some, taking pictures of documentation.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Watergate Scandal was an act by President Nixon, that caused him to become the infamous president he was known as. The Watergate Scandal was a burglary that occurred in June 17, 1972 and was organized by none other than President Nixon himself. The scandal caused a great deal of uncertainty in America as no one wanted to believe that the President would do something so naive and devious. This…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Watergate Scandal Essay

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people argue that the Watergate Scandal had an overall damaging and negative influence on American politics. They say that the scandal instilled in the citizens a feeling of distrust and doubt regarding politicians. On the other hand, I believe that even though the Watergate Scandal was an event of corruption in politics, its positive consequences outweighed the negative. The Watergate Scandal showed President Richard Nixon’s corruption in his attempt to cover up the break in of the office of the Democratic National Committee. Not only did he cover the crime up, he also raised money to keep the burglars quiet and abused his power to obstruct the FBI’s investigation, allowing illicit activities to take place. This event, at first glance,…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All the Presidents Men

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    five men after they were arrested at the Watergate" (Internet, Lukas). I think that in…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Watergate Scandal

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    June 17, 1972 there was a break in reported. The break in was at the Watergate office complex. There were 6 key players in this story. The first was G. Gordon Liddy; he was engineered and executed the Watergate break in. Many say that it was a rogue operation. It is implied that Nixon and Bob Haldeman and John D. Erlichmann did not know anything about the break in. These men got in trouble because they were part of the cover up. This was all supposed to be set up by what they called “The Plumbers”. They were named this in order to cover up or fix any leaks.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crisis Of Confidence

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Watergate scandal also drove the Americans to a crisis of confidence. Before the summer of 1972, the watergate meant nothing more than an office and luxurious complex in Washington DC. On June 17, 1972, five burglars were caught repairing wiretapping equipment and taking pictures of documentation. One of the members of the plumbers, which were spies, was connected to the White House, they were in communication with the burglars. This scandal eventually led…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Watergate Scandal

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In January 1972, G. Gordon Liddy[->0], general counsel to the Committee for the Re-Election of the President[->1] (CRP), presented a campaign intelligence plan to CRP's Acting Chairman Jeb Stuart Magruder[->2], Attorney General John Mitchell[->3], and Presidential Counsel John Dean[->4], that involved extensive illegal activities against the Democratic Party[->5]. Mitchell viewed the plan as unrealistic, but two months later was alleged to have approved a reduced version of the plan which involved burgling the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate Complex[->6] in Washington, D.C. The ostensible purpose of this was to photograph documents and install listening devices. Liddy was nominally in charge of the operation, but has since insisted that he was duped by Dean and at least two of his subordinates. These included former CIA officers E. Howard Hunt[->7] and James McCord[->8], then CRP-Security Coordinator; John Mitchell had by then resigned as Attorney General to become chairman of the CRP."WATERGATE RETROSPECTIVE: THE DECLINE AND FALL"[->9], Time Magazine, August 19, 1974…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays