Preview

How did the Nazis control Germany

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How did the Nazis control Germany
How Far did the Nazi Regime depend on fear rather than popular support for maintaining their control of Germany between 1933-39?

What is this essay asking you to do?

Determine whether the Nazi regime used fear as a method of control of the German people or whether there are other reasons for the fact that the Nazis kept power and control of the German people.
For example
Did propaganda also help?
Was the regime actually popular with Germans?
Why was there no opposition?
Did the Nazis actually give the people what they wanted?
After the failure of the Weimar, did the Nazis ‘look’ strong and in control and thus popular?
Did the fact that the Nazis ‘solved’ the economic problems of Germany help with their popularity?
Did the fact that Hitler began dismantling the T of V help boost his popularity?
How much support did the Nazis have and how far were they in control?

Intro: Set the scene and signpost your argument:
Nazis came to power by default perhaps i.e. high unemployment; only 37% of votes but by the mid 30’s he was in complete control of Germany and had created a one-party state. How far was this process of consolidation of power the reason for maintaining Nazi life – regardless of public opinion and attitudes? It was not only fear that kept control of Germany between 1933 – 1939 but a combination of fear and other factors, good and bad, for example……………….

Para 1
‘Fear’ has to be discussed first and you will have to explain how the Nazis established the atmosphere of fear. Start with the Enabling Act. Article 48 – special powers to banned Communists and opponents. Deals with other parties to get majority to get Enabling Act passed.
Other measures passed – Unions banned, media censorship and other parties were united and dissolve themselves.
SA Night of the Long Knives – Public saw how Nazis dealt with ‘problems’.
SS and Gestapo expand.
Death of Hindenburg meant Hitler becomes Fuhrer.

Para2
Discuss the Fear/Terror in Germany –

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Weimar republic was introduced on the back of Germany’s defeat at WWI, the resignation of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the widely despised signature of the Treaty of Versailles. These conditions led to its collapse in 1933, and also the great rise in popularity for the Nazi party during this period. There is no doubt that a number of economic factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Weimar republic and the rise of the Nazis, however, numerous other factors also played a part. Some historians consider a lack of effective opposition a major contributing in the expansion of the Nazis. It has also been argued that the appeal of the Nazi party won them many votes. Finally, the impact of other political factors cannot be ignored when considering this issue.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apwh Tri 3 Review Answers

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Which of the following was a reason for the popularity of the Nazi Party once it seized power in the 1930's?…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of terror during the period 1929-45 was an important development in German history due to the speed in which the level of terror escalated once Hitler came to power in 1933. However, Anti-Semitism, Nationalism and Hitler’s ideologies were also achieved through Propaganda. Resistance against this terror were significant developments during this time as well. It would be fair to argue that terror was a consistent element throughout this given time frame. However, the speed in which terror increased clearly out ranked the speed of other developments as a use of control and severe manipulation and could therefore be deemed as the most important.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The new regime made no bones about using coercion in many forms against its declared enemies”2 However, enemies were not the only group that were at threat from Hitler and his coercion policies. Hitler, unlike previous German rulers, realised that in order to secure his position he must have a wall of protection against any possible uprising in the country if he was to remain as the Chancellor of Germany. The SS was created by Hitler and expanded “into a nationwide organisation to hunt down enemies of the state.”3 Here Historian, Boxer, highlights the idea that the SS were created to wipe out any possible opposition to Nazi ideology a prime example of this being The Night Of The Long Knives. This saw Hitler wipe out his previous task force in 1934, as he feared they might “compromise his plan to suppress workers’ rights in exchange for German industry making the country war ready.”4 Hitler showed here that he was prepared to use physical coercion tactics on almost anyone including men he had worked closely with as “Rohm and dozens of SA leaders were summarily executed.”5 Had Hitler not have used coercion in this example then it could have been possible that the “radical ambitions of the SA, who kept longing for a real social revolution.”6 May have had enough strength to remove Hitler from power and begin a revolution of their own; therefore in this case coercion proved to be important to him and his challenge of…

    • 998 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some historians have taken up the view point that without the popularity the Nazi Regime would not have been able to survive. Through its policies, it is clear to see that the Regime tried to make it look like they were working for the good of society in order to make Germany a better place. It would appear that the majority of the German people supported the regime; however, as it was a repressive state, it is unclear as to whether this is fully correct. In source four, historian Robert Gellately supports the argument of popularity as he gives the impression that the majority of people agreed with the extensive policing measures that were put in place by the Nazi regime as they believed it was improving German society as a whole. In the defence of source four, historian E.A. Johnson in source 6, to some extent, supports Robert Gellately as he gives the impression that…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terror and violence were prominent factors in allowing the Nazis to consolidate power in 1933, for the reason that violence still had an impact on political developments, even the negotiations between Hitler, Von Papen and Hindenburg took place against the backdrop of well publicized acts of SA brutality. In May 1933 SA members stormed trade union headquarters and disbanded it. This violence led many leaders of the SPD to flee abroad and in June its party was officially banned and the 3000 that remained were arrested and a number were killed. This ultimately portrays the brutality of the Nazis, which effectively contributed to their consolidation of power. After the Reichstag fire the police were given the powers to detain suspects indefinitely without reference to the courts. The decree ‘For the protection of the people and the state’ was used to justify the arrest, imprisonment and often torture of thousands of political opponents, and on 23 March 1933 Hitler presented the Enabling Act to an intimidated Reichstag in order to consolidate Nazi power. The Reichstag passed laws which voted itself out of existence; the communists were barred from voting. The brutality of the Nazis' bought Hitler four years of a dictatorship. The Nazis managed to use terror with efficient ruthlessness and after the Enabling Act was the destruction of local state government; state…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent do the weaknesses of Weimar democracy explain Hitler’s rise to power in 1933?…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ulrich Herbert’s “Good Times, Bad Times” is about the contrast between the ways typical working Germans perceived the years before and during Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor, his rise to dictator, and during and after and World War II. The article cites a survey conducted by the Institut für Demoskopie (Public Opinion Institute) in 1949, as well as an oral-history project conducted at the universities of Essen and Hagen between 1930-1960. Both studies indicate that “for a large part of the population the image of National Socialism was characterized principally not by terror, mass murder and war but by reduction of unemployment, economic boom, tranquility and order.”(Bessel, p. 97).…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in 1933 brought about the beginning of the end to a brief democratic government in Germany. He worked hard to return to the old Totalitarian rule with himself as dictator, and also for ‘Machtergreifung’ – the seizure of power. Hitler had no intention of sharing power and his aim was to achieve complete control over Germany and to build a German Empire through the Nazi Party. His personality and manifesto were extremely convincing to people of all age groups and people believed Hitler had the power to restore Germany to past greatness. Promises such as the decrease in unemployment levels were also coming true and his totalitarian rule had suppressed all other opposition. Dr.Goebels also played a large part in covering up the horrific truth behind Hitler’s ideology. The propaganda convinced the German people that the violence used, such as the action of the SS, was beneficial to the maintenance of the state. The Nazi’s also began to victimize certain stereotypes so that they would gain more support and shift the blame for any problems onto groups such as the Jews. This also inevitably installed a fear in most Germans.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nazi party won 33 percent of the vote in the 1932 German elections, more than any other party. In January of that year Hitler was appointed chancellor, the head of the German government, and many Germans believed he could save them from the economic situation they were in. The Nazis ruled Germany from 1933 to 1939 and their position was relatively unchallenged. It is a common argument among historians as to how the Nazis managed to maintain power over this period of time. Successful foreign policy was an important factor involved in the Nazis consolidation of power which involved Hitlers attempts to strengthen Germany and undermine the treaty of Versailles.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the impact of World War One took its toll on Europe countries like Russia, Italy and Germany were in dire need of a change. Germany was most impacted by the war and was left in a state where everyday citizens were homeless, jobless, and starving. Looking for someone save Germany, Germans were in a desperate need for change and turned to group of radicals that were rising in power at a rapid rate known as the Nazis. Looking for someone to “save Germany” the Nazi’s unconventional but radical beliefs gave many Germans a strong sense of hope. “One of the reasons the Nazi ideology was so successful in eliciting support for the party and consensus behind its program was that its structure was built central concepts that, in the…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first opinion presented in the sources is that the Nazi regime enjoyed broad consent brought about by popular policies. Source Y partially agrees with this statement, stating that ‘The symbolic payments of the state, special contributions of industry, as well as ‘strength through joy’ trips and events stabilised relations to the Hitler state to a not inconsiderable degree’. This argues that the policies put forward by the Nazi regime helped to get the people of Germany on their side and were enjoyed fully.…

    • 873 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holocaust Essay

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Assess the view that the most important element in maintaining Hitler's regime in power between 1933 and 1945 was the consent of the German people.…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the process of choosing a topic, I had many ideas that I wanted to research. I thought about exploring areas in Art and English but I constantly kept having thoughts about history. I love to learn about our history and I was attracted to choosing a topic that had to do with Hitler’s Germany. History is one of my most favorite subjects in school. I always look forward to becoming more educated in areas that have to do with our world’s past. For many years I have briefly learned about The Holocaust, Nazi Germany and Hitler, but I wanted to learn more. Choosing Hitler and the rise of the Nazi party was a common theme that I have always longed to do. Even though I have no family that actually experienced life in Nazi Germany, I have met people who told me amazing stories about their knowledge of Germany during the early twentieth century. Writing a paper on this subject matter will not only be very interesting but at the same time enjoyable to study.…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Antisemitism in Mein Kampf

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mein Kampf is a book of two volumes authored by Adolf Hitler. The first volume was written whilst dictated to Rudolph Hess and Emile Maurice in Landsberg prison where Hitler was sentenced to following the failure of an attempted coup d’état of the Bavarian government in 1924. Mein Kampf is significant amongst historiography as it is thought to be an insight into the mind of Adolf Hitler. This book is not only autobiographical but full of memoires and political ideologies, which have subsequently sparked debate as to whether this piece of primary historical evidence can be regarded as the blue-print for Hitler’s future ambitions. An intentionalist view by Historians’ such as Lucy Dawidowicz, argues that the Holocaust was the result of Hitler’s long term plan, whereas the functionalist perspective by Historians’ such as Christopher Browning is of the result of a competing agents within the Reich to answer the Jewish question. Chapter 11 of Mein Kampf: Nation and Race, shows to comprehend with the intentionalist interpretation that this did indeed set the foundation for Holocaust as a propaganda medium.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays