Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

Good Essays
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny
The United States has a very good government system. But how did they archive this goal without tyranny? The United States constitution, that’s how. Besides giving the people an abundance of rights and freedoms, it protected the people from another tyranny.
They got these writes stated in the constitution which included the idea of federalism, separation of powers and a system of checks and balances.
Federalism makes sure no one group of people has all the power. In Document A it says since there are two governments “ double security arises to the rights of the people.”
Federalism was a good idea for government because it gave the people a sense of security from the government. The government will make sure all is divided and will control each other, but still be a separate government. “ The different governments will each control each other at the same time will be controlled by itself.”
Another thing the constitution did to guard against tyranny was separate the powers. The idea that power needed a limit came from the Magna Carta 1215/ if all the power was in the hands of one person or group there would be tyranny. “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” Document B.
Tranny of big states was also protected. Article 1, Section 2, House of Representatives
Clause 3 says that representatives will be assigned with proportional representation. The
Upper house or Senate will have two senators per state. This was a good compromise because it gave small states a say in the decisions. If the Upper house and Lower house were both proportional representation then the smaller states would not get a voice and the big states would rule.
The powers were separated but how did they make sure the branches functioned properly. Checks and Balances was the way to make the separation of power work. Each branch would check the others to make sure they were following the rules. Document C explains how the branches check and balance each other. The executive branch nominates judges for the Supreme Court; which tell the president if he is being unconstitutional. The legislative branch can remove the president and judges from power. Both branches can tell congress that it is being unconstitutional or veto its laws. “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.”
The United States constitution is very well rounded, especially when it protects its citizens from a tyranny. The Federalism system with separation of powers that check and balance each other is perfect to protect against tyranny. I think the constitution was very good and should be used worldwide.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Great Compromise”: provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of Federalism in the United States was a gradual event that had definitions of federal government being given in federalist 46 and 28 which gave definitions of a federalist government to the United States. As stated by James Madison one of the architects of the federal kind of government, “the state and national governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers." The purpose of such a kind of government was to protect the rights of the people in all its earnestness.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism breaks down what National , State and local governments can and cannot do. Like the national government and only the National government has the power to tax,make treaties,coin money,establish post offices,raise a military,declare war,admit new states,build dams,interstate highways,Fund…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Population)…” But, on the other hand small states would have a disadvantage of representation in the House like, Rhode Island. Big state v. small state guarded against tyranny because we came up with a compromise of two senators for each state. Through the compromise no one state gains more control and has more power than the…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny is means ‘as harsh absolute power in the hands of one individual’; it has happened everywhere. Whatever the size or shape, tyranny is a problem because it means too much power in the hands of one person or group. In 1787, Representatives from almost all the states in the U.S, met in Philadelphia to fix the issue of tyranny. The House presents us to “The Articles of Confederation” to help guard against tyranny. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in ways such as having the federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the large and small states both treated equally.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By ensuring that the legislature contains both equal and proportional representation and finding a way to give both the federal government and the individual states a voice through Dual Levels of Federalism, the United States Constitution manages to reconcile the varied interest groups, small states and big states, Localists and Federalists to form a more perfect union.…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America was going through a time of great debates and dilemma’s. It became obvious that a better more powerful national government was necessary. The Articles of Confederation was weak and needed to be replaced. While this was occurring a major problem developed. This was between large states, which vied for legislature segmented by population, and smaller states which wanted the system to have equal portioned votes everywhere. The larger states suggested the Virginia Plan, and the small states proposed the New Jersey Plan. At first, this issue was at a stalemate and both sides refused to give up ground. Eventually, Oliver Ellsworth offered The Great Compromise. This called for a bicameral Legislature with proportional…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is defined as the division of power between central government and regional governments, but the addition of new principles into the American federal government overcomplicates the true definition of federalism, generating about five hundred theories. For example, dual federalism declares that the power of the national government and states are different and separate like a layered cake, while cooperative federalism states that the national government and state governments undertake government functions together by sharing power with no overruled power over the other.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To create a stronger national government and to guard against the misuse and abuse of its powers, the Federalists believe that the government should have separate powers, so they wanted to divide the governing powers up between different branches of the government. I agree with what the Federalists wanted to do here because one branch can only take so much. So, to make things easier and fair, they wanted to split the powers up.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Originally, Congress would be seen as a 1 chamber with only a certain number of representatives per state. The debate was how many representatives should each state have and with this came up 2 plans. Delegates from the larger states came up and supported the Virginia plan which called for different number of representatives per state based on population. Delegates from smaller…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution created an ingenious way to avoid tyranny of one branch over other branches, with a system of checks and balances. James Madison wrote in the Federalist Paper”…the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as they may be a check on…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It gives the people from the twelve states a higher representation than those in Illinois which is the opposite of the United States democratic…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays