Preview

How Did The American Revolution Influence The Idea Of Republicanism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The American Revolution Influence The Idea Of Republicanism
America's revolution against the British was fought for freedom from high taxation. Many Americans did not approve of the monarchial government of Britain. When the American Revolution ended, America formed a new type of government based on the ideas of republicanism. This idea revolved around the concept that ultimate political authority should be vested in the citizens of the nation. Republicanism was a very radical idea because no government in the past had ever tried or succeeded with the ideas of republicanism. America's first constitution was called the Articles of Confederations and it was drafted in 1777. This constitution only lasted for eleven year because the Federalists wanted to strengthen the government. In 1788, the new Federal Constitution was ratified by all the states except North …show more content…
Many antifederalists did not want the government to have so much control over America. Amending the articles would require the confirmation of every state legislature. Unlike the king of Britain, the antifederalists were against one person ruling America and so they refused to appoint one single president under the Articles of Confederation. This created a weakness in the government. Under the Articles, the individual states would be represented by one to seven delegates with each state holding only one vote in Congress. The Articles gave the individual states more power than the federal government. When Congress needed money, it would have to ask the individual states to contribute money to the federal government. This complicated the government and made it extremely inefficient. Additionally, all of the judicial power would be given to the states. Regulation of commerce would be regulated by treaties that would hold no check on conflicting state regulations. The Articles of Confederation essentially gave much more power and control to individual states than to the federal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the time the Constitution was written there were two different parties that wanted different things from the United States government. The Revolutionaries or “Radicals”, led by men such as Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams and Patrick Henry, emphasized the strength and efficiency in government. These were the men who wanted Liberty and the Bill of Rights. The other famous group was the Federalists, which consisted of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These leaders were more concerned with popular aspects of society such as power, control, and the protection of property rights. In order to keep maintain their wealth, they supported a strong central government, much like the current British system. Both parties contained some of the boldest and most radical thinkers of their time, helping make the Constitution last over 200…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with this was the amount of certainty on certain issues, which was virtually nonexistent. Since the federal government couldn't do much of anything, it was up to the states to decide, and what was good for one state wasn't necessarily good for all states, so nothing could build up and actually happen with that system. For example, document A describes the decision making on imposting trade, which wouldn't be fair because some states have trading as their only source of income. In this aspect, the Articles of Confederation did quite the opposite of making the government more effective; all they did was take away authority. The Articles not only took away authority, but made it nearly impossible to get anything completed, especially because all 13 states had to unanimously agree on the proposed bill, etc. Also, of the authorities that the federal government did have, there was no way for them to enforce…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were numerous of problems under the “Articles of Confederation”. Several of the main problems were its incapacity of increasing funds, the necessity of completing consent to accomplish modifications , the “lack of authority over internal trade , foreign relations, and debt.” The central problem was that the states turned down the idea of giving the national government sufficient power to function properly. The articles gave each single state “independence”, but gave the “federal government” very little power. Congress had a hard time ratifying laws for the reason being that “ 9 out of 13 states” had to concede with passing them before any of them could fully go through .Congress did not have the authority to accumulate taxes required…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Government has come along way since the American Revolution. The Revolutionary War spawned from America's determination to break free from the British Empire and its monarchy and develop a more democratic form of government. During the revolution, America was looking for a more decentralized form of power and ratified The Articles of Confederation, which divided the majority of the power between the states. The Articles of Confederation had been essential for getting the country through war, but after the war ended, it became apparent that its limitations of governing would be insufficient for leading this developing nation. The Constitutional Convention was developed in 1787 and was left with the responsibility of ratifying a new constitution that would best fit the new country. Controversies over the constitution ultimately caused a separation between the public. This separation resulted in the country's first political parties, the Federalists and the Antifederalists. The two groups engaged in numerous debates concerning the ratification of the Constitution as well as the Alien and Sedition Acts. Each argued for what they felt was in the best interest of the country and each had clear and legitimate reasons backing their opinions.…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Articles of confederation limited some powers, it failed because it was too weak. The articles of confederation gave most of the powers to the states. There was no national executive or judicial branches except within the states. Congress had the power to make laws but without a executive branch they could not enforce laws. While the Articles of Confederation was weak the Federalist papers 51 was not. The federalist papers focus mainly on checks and balances, which made sure that no certain or specific branch of government gained too much power. It also focused on separation of powers within the national government, which made sure that not one branch was higher or had more power than another government…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution grants state's representation and a stronger government as compared to the opposite with the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation value state's right because there is no judicial branch present. The Constitution created a Judicial Branch, and defines it as one supreme court. The Judicial Branch serves as a law enforcer in which the newly formed America needed. Also, the Judicial Branch would serve as another governing body to strength the power of the central government. The Articles of Confederation state for amendments to be created, “All states have to be in unison”. The Constitution allows for a stronger government by having 3/4th of the states having to be in unison to pass an amendment. This allows…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Flaws

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the United States declared independence from Great Britain in 1776, the thirteen states knew that they needed to create a document that stated their unity as one nation. In 1777, the Continental Congress wrote the Articles of Confederation, which became known as the first official government of the United States. While this new form of government had multiple achievements, it also had many failures, which eventually led to its replacement with the Constitution. The Articles of Confederation was a very influential document and greatly impacted the history of the United States.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After having won their independence from Great Britain in 1781, the nation of America put into action the first constitution of the United States of America, the Articles of Confederation. This constitution ultimately failed as it did not give congress and the national government enough power to govern over the people of America. After much debate, a Constitutional Convention was called to reconsider “the situation of the United States”, and ended up ratified a new constitution in the hope of bringing back America which was falling apart.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the monarchial rule under George III the people lacked governmental power. There are two sides to ratifying the Constitution. The Federalists who want to adopt the Constitution and the Antifederalists who wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation. Many Antifederalists believed that the governmental power should rest in the states, and…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were a great start to shaping and unifying our country, but it was just that, a “start”. It needed to take the country as a whole into consideration in order for it to hold this unity in place. The Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution of the United States. Although similar in some aspects, very different in others. The articles had many weaknesses that were changed in the Constitution. There were many compromises made between the states in order to effectively draft the Constitution. Roger Sherman’s Plan kept the Constitutional Convention together which was later known as the Great Compromise. The fight for the Constitution had just begun and the ratification processes needed to take place. Even with some states being in favor of the Constitution it would take time to get the nine states needed to complete this process. The states in favor would called themselves The Federalist and those opposed were called the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist set out to change the mind of the remaining states with a series of letters that were written to newspapers.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, the Anti Federalist and the Articles of Confederation may have had good intentions for the country, but it wasn’t so good for the people. The Articles of Confederation gave the states too much power so they could do whatever they wanted which caused division in the country because every state had its own currency. When the Constitution was put in place though, it unified the United States by giving the Central Government the power to rule over the states. The federalist and the Constitution were significantly better than their opposites which is why the Constitution is still around to this…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dddddddd

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page

    DDDDDDDSd efgEGGGGGGGGGGGcourts and settle disputes between states. Thus the power given to Congress gave it permission to operate with moderate control over the states. Another plus was that the Articles made provisions to allow equal voting in Congress for each state and the understanding that most decisions were to be made by majority vote. However, the states despised even "moderate" government involvement in their affairs and especially with government taxation. This was a major cause of inflation, which ultimately consumed the nation. The articles also did not give the government the power to enforce laws thus relying on the voluntary compliance by the states. But in order to change the Articles all of the representatives had to be in agreement. The negations of the Articles soon grew more evident and although some states did not want things to change it became evident that change was needed and inevitable.…

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays