Preview

How Did Lenin Criticize The Provisional Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lenin Criticize The Provisional Government
The Tsar had made an enemy of his people while simultaneously entangling Russia in a war that they were unequipped to handle. World War 1 appeared to be a complete disaster for Russia in 1917. The Great Retreat of 1915 brought the Austrian-Hungarian Army to Russia’s doorstep and Nicholas II decides to abandon the home front to command the Russian army in the borderlands. This left the unpopular Tsarina in charge of the country contributing to the anger and discontent of the autocracy. 1916 brought widespread demonstrations, strikes, and conflicts with police as the people desperately expressed “calls for bread” and continued to openly express their hatred for the autocracy’s authority. Soldiers begin taking the side of the Russian people, often standing in …show more content…
This full blown political revolt leads to the occupation of the Duma in which the people elect their own deputies who establish the “dual power” arrangement with workers. They take control of the state and establish Order #1 which consolidates power in the Duma between elected deputies and the Soviet workers, essentially forcing Nicholas II to abdicate the throne. Order #1 becomes a source of contention under the Provisional Government. Lenin returns to Russia in 1917 and immediately criticizes the Provisional government and focuses his efforts on arming the proletariat and poor peasantry. In his April Thesis, Lenin articulates the goals of the Soviets which includes the abolition of “dual power” in favor of full Soviet control along with proposing for an end to the World War I by making peace with Germany. The Provisional Government, headed by Alexander Kerensky, responds to Lenin’s April Thesis through a new coalition with the Mensheviks along with continued commitments to their World War I allies. As the provisional government begins taking similar stances as the monarchy which preceded it, as increasing distrust of the government leads to increasing political polarization. A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians may believe the Provisional Government was doomed because of a major problem with the provisional government which was the Dual Authority. The Provisional Government was made up of members of the old Duma that had refused to disband at the Tsars command. This meant that they were basically the same men that the Tsar had appointed before the revolution, so nothing had changed in that regard. Consequently, they had no goodwill from the public backing them up, so they would be judged purely on what the public could see happening. Furthermore, the Government had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. This illegitimate relationship lessened the power of the Provisional Government existentially. Incidentally, it should be mentioned that the two factions were not necessarily hostile towards one another from the start, with some members being members of both groups at the same time. This combination of convenience however, could not last for long.Without a shred of a doubt, one of the biggest problems with the Provisional Government was the continuation of the war. The war was a lost cause by this stage and the Provisional Government would have wanted to pull out if it were a logical possibility, but in order to keep Russia afloat they needed to keep up the fight for the money that they were receiving from Britain and France. The loans that Russia had taken out from these countries while under the Tsarist regime had left Russia financially destroyed. The injections of money and supplies that the allies were providing Russia with because of their involvement in the war was the only thing keeping Russia stable. If Russia could have started to engage in peace talks, as suggested by Josef Stalin, then the Provisional Government could concentrate on sorting out the social and economic problems properly, but because of the desperate need for the war credits, this was not a viable solution. The effect of this choice to keep fighting is somewhat akin to watching a…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was the seizure of power by the radical Marxists led by Vladimir Lenin and was one of the pivotal moments of the 20th Century. The ramifications of the event, and the subsequent establishment of the world's first Communist regime were immediately obvious, but also had continuing repercussions for decades. This essay will argue that although Lenin and Stalin seemed to have conflicting views, in reality they shared very similar policies; Stalin just took these policies to an extreme.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Russia had endured many more hardships and downfalls following the conclusion of World War I. According to The Making of the West, “the government’s incompetence and Nicholas II’s stubborn resistance to change had made the war even worse in Russia than elsewhere” (Hunt et al. 683). The. In the early revolution in February, the monarchy was overthrown and a provisional government was put into place, however it failed to meet all the desires of the working class and…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 24th October 1917 the Lenin and the Bolsheviks led a revolution in Russia. The Bolshevik Red Guards led a revolution against the Provisional Government by seizing control of stations, telephone exchanges, post offices, the national bank and the Winter Palace in Petrograd. Now Lenin set about creating the world’s first communist state. Although he was a strong influence, he was not solely responsible for the outbreak of revolution. There are other important causes of the Bolshevik seizure of power, such as the weakness of the Provisional government and Kerensky’s mistakes. Also other important factor was the actions of Trotsky and the timing and luck of the Bolsheviks. However, Lenin was, to a large extent, crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power because he presented his April thesis, which gave the people of Russia an awakening to the communist aim.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * On March 12, the Duma or legislative body that Czar Nicholas II had tried to dissolve, met and established a provisional government, which mainly consisted of middle-class Duma representatives; it was headed by Alexander Kerensky…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This plan to seize power was mainly based of Lenin's and Lenin's collaborators ideas. The role of Lenin in the overthrow of the provisional government is huge. He was the Bolshevik's leader and controlled the soviets…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In March, 1917, Tsar Nicholas resigned from the throne. New laws were passed by the new government called the ‘Provisional Government’, many Russians faced by poverty were expecting changes, but the laws did not pass their expectations. This government did not last long. Lenin, leader of the Bolsheviks travelled to Russia and was dissatisfied with the new government and made a bid for power. In October, the Bolsheviks led another revolution, which remove the Provisional Government from power. With Lenin, now the ruler of Russia, he went about completely altering Russia into a Communist society.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the tsar, Lenin has taken the ‘throne’ and along with the Bolsheviks proceeded to turn Russia into a one-party state. It can be argued that Russia has remained almost unchanged in terms of government policies and its traditions this is shown by Lenin's oppressive policies such as censorship. Lenin was not born into power and this shows he is in fact not an "heir" to Russian tradition. Similarly he had as little time for democracy as the tsars had, and as heir to the Russian tradition had followed the oppressive system and provided the continuation of the absolutist tradition in Russian. The Kronstadt revolt (1921) was a clear proof of the absolutism of the Bolshevik control and it is seen that rather than changing- Lenin ultimately replaced one form of state authoritarianism with another.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War 1 Russia Values

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are always two sides to every story. When a country in an alliance backs out of a war, there is bound to be controversy. Some say it is unacceptable, and cowardly to leave your allies on their own. Key countries can make the difference between a victory and a defeat in war. There are very strong ties connecting the ‘players.’ In World War I, Russia was a key player. When people accuse it of cowardice, and betrayal, most do not realize the fact that in each country, there are unique issues that can impact its ability to contribute positively to the fight. Due to certain realities surrounding Russia’s royal family, the October revolution,…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The Bolsheviks used two main methods to consolidate power between the years of 1917 and 1921. The first method was the introduction of social, economic and military reforms aimed at consolidating their support among the peasants and the working class. The second method was one of coercion to crush the opponents with their ruthless nature. Along with these methods, the Bolsheviks victory in the Civil War was the main contributing factor towards their success as they were better organised and better led than opponents. In addition, they had a compelling ideology and offered more to Russia’s peasants and workers than did their opponents.…

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays