Preview

How Did Lao Tzu View Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1020 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lao Tzu View Of Government
Many people question if the government should be responsible for instructing people how to live in society. These people also demand welfare from the government, but are not willing to accept the laws, and the people who run the government. Lao-Tzu discusses in Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching how the government should handle its people.
In today’s society the government is expected to define right and wrong and punish the law breakers, who may not share the same morals as the government. These people who break laws may have thought that what they were doing was correct. Lau Tzu would not do this. He does not define morals. Lou Tzu would rather not have morals at all. According to Lao-Tzu people should left to make their own choices. He believes that if we let go of what society views as correct, then the people will know what to do (207). Throughout Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching it is suggested that a leader must not influence people to do anything. A leader should just let things happen and that the people will always choose the right (207). Today leadership is viewed as a way in which a person can influences others to accomplish an objective. Today it is seen that people tend to rebel against authority, and that they will not be content and do the opposite of what they are told (Lao-Tzu, 211). In Lao-Tzu’s
…show more content…
Although he also states that in order to lead, first it is necessary for the people who are being ruled to forget all that they know.( Lao-Tzu, 206). A leader could then completely persuade anyone to obey. When people cannot think there is no way for them to make decisions that are what are best for them. If people could not think for themselves, then it would be the duty of the leader to instruct them on how to act. Lao-Tzu on the other hand believes that it is not the responsibility of the leader to show instruct the governed, that they will just know what to do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Yes, the government plays an important role in conveying the rights and duties of citizens and how to protect them from threats. Yet, this is very different from how individual’s assume that the duty of the government is to create these rights or implement people’s duties through various programs that replace a person’s ability to assess and initiate things independently.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli believed that in strong government control by a prince who acted more in terms of practicality and maintaining power than through moral principles. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, took a more individualistic, carefree approach, believing that a ruler will be respected and followed if he does not act powerfully and force rules and issues.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The town was destroyed and many of the residents were sold into slavery and various rebellions occurred in the following years. Nevertheless, the blame cannot all be placed on the community members alone. According to Yangming, “the government failed the citizens by not properly teaching them in addition to a lack of families regulating themselves or exerting good influence on their fellow villagers.” This compact also shows Yangming’s fondness of Confucian ideals by giving community members a list of guidelines they must follow in order to improve society as a whole. By focusing on the ideals of Confucianism, the author thought citizens would become “good.” Confucianism exists to educate people to be self-motivated and to enable people to assume their responsibilities, which cultivates a better self and a harmonious society, which is…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In comparing and contrasting the governmental philosophies of the great thinkers Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli, I have found a pleasant mix of both of their ideas would be the best for America today. Lao-Tzu's laisse-faire attitude…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu’s writings offered a basis for Taoism, a religion officially founded by Chang Tao-ling in about 150 A.D. However, the Tao-te Ching is an ethical document as much as about good government as it is about moral behavior. Niccolo Machiavelli was an aristocrat who had his ups and downs according the shifts in power in Florence. His writings encourage a prince to secure power by almost any means necessary. Lao-Tzu’s Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching and Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Qualities of the Prince both have main goals of how to mold a better prince. Their views on government and the ways they attain their goals each differ in method.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many kinds of leaders in this world that believe that their style of leadership is the best. Machiavelli and Lao Tzu were two people that believed that their style of ruling was the best way to rule. They were both extremely outspoken and they stood by their ways. Both Machiavelli and Lao Tzu were very clear about how they thought a government should be run. Even though they both held strong opinions on how a government should be ran, they could not be any more different. If Machiavelli agreed with one topic, most likely, Lao Tzu would be completely against it. Their beliefs are the exact opposite of each other. Machiavelli thought that a ruler should be very strict while Lao Tzu thought that they should be laid back and let the people live their lives the way they wanted too.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emperor Taizong and Emperor Sui Yangdi have very different perspectives on how a government should be ran and how a ruler should act. For example according to Ebrey, Emperor Taizong stated, “The ruler cultivates his character through frugality and peacefulness. Restraining himself, he will not tire his people or disturb his subordinates. Thus, his people will not complain and his rule will not go off course”. This quote is showing that Emperor Taizong believed that the government should be ran smoothly and the ruler shall be peaceful, in return the subjects should be well civilized with little to no rebellion. This is showing that Emperor Taizong thinks that government should not interfere with the people and the people should not interfere…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A good leader has to listen to others view points and use it as a earning point and understand that it is okay to change their mind.…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my eyes the government should put the people first 100% of the time. If leaders don’t make decisions based on what the people want, it leads to an unbalance and a disconnect between the people and government. That’s why so many people today distrust the government because they feels as if the government doesn’t represent them, like their voice isn’t heard. People in power should be the first ones to help in times of trouble. They should be a rock and bright light for those who feel hopeless. People in power should assist in every possible way in times of tragedy because its shows that you care about the everyday person, not just the person that cast a vote. In America, the President should be the one everybody can count on to be a symbol of hope and freedom. After all, the President is the leader of the free world. All in all, people in power should always have the best interest of the people in mind and should always be an honest and reliable outlet for their people.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu Critical Lens

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote can be interpreted as saying that one who understands and has control over themselves is the most powerful individual. A person might be physically strong enough to defeat someone in battle, but when faced with a personal or internal problem, they will not be able to overcome it since they don't understand themselves enough to deal with the issue. Lao Tzu is saying that people who fully understand themselves enough to overcome their problems and defeat the internal obstacles that stand in their way are more powerful individuals than those who do not, even though they might be stronger in a physical or other sense.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we are watching the makings of this election season unfold in front of us, many of us are quick to defend or challenge any presidential candidate. It is during this crucial time that, not only do we get to see the politics that people hold dear, but also the the embodiment of the leader they want. Some people would say that they would rather have no leader instead of one of these candidates. However, leaders are a necessity, for any group, organization, or established, set society and community. In Common Sense, Thomas Paine states that “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil”. He elaborates, saying that when we encounter miseries from a government, that we would normally encounter with the lack of one, “we furnish…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Society is made up of leaders and followers. While many wants to, not all can be leaders. A leader is somebody who guides or directs others by showing them the way. A leader is someone that can influence people. He is someone that people want to follow and respect, makes good decisions, can think quickly. He is self-confident, and knows what to do next. A leader is someone who can guide others to their own empowerment.…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Bureaucracy Wrong

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government,” Thomas Jefferson once said. The government is a precarious, but influential, part in the world today. Many believe that everything the government does should be implemented in order to keep structure in our daily lives. However, bureaucracy is not always right. The government can often prove it can not be credible, plausible, or dependable. For as long as democracy has been in place, people have disagreed with it. Yet, if it were not for these disputes, government would never be anything that it is today. It is appropriate to go against the government if there is a conscience-challenged problem that can be solved civilly.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let us say that you as a leader wanted to take your followers to a team building exercise – like bowling. You decide that you would reward the bowlers who consistently out produced their counterparts. However, you decide that you would turn all of the lights in the bowling alley off. Now your followers can still find the lanes and even bowl down the alleys. They can hear the balls hitting pins, but they can’t determine whether they have bowled a strike, a split or something in between. The point here is that this is what you are doing if as a leader you refuse to counsel your followers, or if you do counsel them improperly. These are missed opportunities to bring those subordinates into line with the values and goals…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays