Preview

How Did Joseph Stalin Influence The Economy Of Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Joseph Stalin Influence The Economy Of Russia
As a result of the Russian Revolution, Russia became a world power, industrialized, and a communist nation. The new leadership that was in place allowed for Russia to become a world power. Although banks and big businesses were altered to become controlled by the government, small entities were allowed to run under free enterprise which successfully caused economic boom. In essence, a good economy is essential to the ability of a country to compete with other nations. The five year plan system allowed for the industrialization of the former Soviet Union. Success of this magnitude can be shown in the collectivization of farms which fueled the work force. The autocracy of Russia’s past is now gone and communism is in its place. The Bolshevik party which gained control of Russia was of the Marxist party. The leaders of the then Soviet Union used these beliefs to rule the nation. One leader in particular had an interesting role in the whole revolution. …show more content…
He gathered money in order to fund the Bolshevik party. However, he did this by several bank heists and different criminal activities. Being he did not get caught doing so he used this ability to look better for his faction. One of Stalin’s main competitors was Leon Trotsky which he was able to outmaneuver. He did this by appointing members or allies of himself to government positions. With a solid support base Stalin was able to move up on the political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The torpor of the Russian economy compared to other European Great Powers was a prominent predicament to both Alexander III and Nicholas II. In order to sustain Russia’s Great Power status, both Tsars engaged in a policy of economic renewal between the years 1881 and 1095. Despite success in managing to proliferate economic growth rates, the attempts of economic reform between 1881 and 1905 weren’t sufficient in order to make Russia’s economy strong enough to fully maintain Russia’s ‘Great Power’ status as Russia still lagged behind the other Great Powers come 1905. (92)…

    • 756 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    o Trans-Siberian Railroad o Foreign investment o “exhaustion at the base” 1894-1917 nicholas ii 1898 founding of Marxist Russian social democratic labor party marxists who favored proletariat, working class 1900 international financial crisis 1902 founding of socialist revolutionary party anti marxist, and anti capitalist favored peasants and violence 1903 mensheviks and bolsheviks arose bolsheviks wanted revolution ASAP mensheviks were pro waiting 1903 massive wave of strikes 1904 russia goes to war with japan Russia failed and this caused privitization and additional hardship 1905 bloody Sunday: led to mass distress in country father gapon October manifesto: granted civil liberties to Russian people and the establishment of parliament 1906 first duma: lower chamber of Russian parliament 1906-1911 stolypin assassinated A. Stolypin believed that by abolishing the peasant commune, they would be more productive B. Kulaks: new peasant class, upper class peasants, had more money and were more intelligent C. Stop division of land; title of land goes to families o Redistribute land so peasants get plot…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Lenin and Stalin one finds that both were following a communist ideal but what is the communist ideal? The main principal is to share a country's wealth amongst its people. This is the theoretical side of the communist idea; the practical side requires a careful planning of the country's economy and also a system that makes sure that everybody is treated equally.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin became leader of Russia in 1927. He needed to achieve the support of the Russian people and he managed to do this by using his intellect and power. He used propaganda and mass media. He also cleverly rewrote history, making it look as if he had a bigger part in the October revolution than he actually did. He also managed to make his relationship with Lenin look much closer than they were. He cunningly told Trotsky the wrong date for Lenin’s funeral, and became the chief mourner at Lenin’s funeral. This helped gain support for him greatly as the Russian people looked up to Lenin.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did Stalin come to be the dominant leader of the Soviet Union? On the eve of Lenin’s death, there was no real or clear successor who would take leadership of the party. Even before his death Lenin himself recognised that there would be a power struggle between two of the most prominent leaders in the party, Trotsky and Stalin, which he expressed in his last testament (which was shielded from the public eye until the early 1950’s). In Lenin’s last testament, he even went on to briefly assess members of the party which could result in good leadership within the party. Through reading the last testament it seems clear that Lenin preferred Trotsky as a person, even if he does mention that he can be arrogant, and this can also been seen with…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And this was completed without threat of the gulags, without the threat of imprisonment and without the threat of murder – political prowess gained him victory alongside other factors. It would be ignorant to solely admire Stalin for his climb to power – he was helped along by luck as the death of Lenin came along at an advantageous time, the weaknesses of his opponents in terms of Trotsky tearing himself apart at some points of the struggle and the help of his early allies Zinoviev and Kamenev, who were key to the dismantling of Trotsky in the early years of the struggle. But all along Stalin had ensured he was allied with the stronger players and continued to build up his powerbase through the trickiest of times. Although there were other factors associated with Stalin, for example he was loyal to the proletariat and excruciatingly cunning and the position of General Secretary was absolutely paramount to his rise to power after Lenin’s death as it gave him the ability to appoint whoever he liked to the Politburo. Without this patronage, Stalin would most likely have not gained the power of the USSR and would have been overcome at many an…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky had a policy called ‘Permanent Revolution’. He wanted to spread communism to the neighboring countries. Stalin had a different point of view – he believed that at first it was important to establish and strengthen communism in the USSR. Stalin was able to appoint his supporters on key positions in the communist party. He was able to do that mainly due to the fact that Trotsky was busy gaining the support of the people because he wanted to convince them about the benefit of ‘Permanent Revolution’ and also he believed that it is important to have the…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Lenin was the most significant leader of Russia and the USSR due to his revolutionary ideas, such as the implementation of socialist reforms, his New Economic Policy in 1921 and the transformation of the Bolshevik faction to the Communist Part of the Soviet Union leading to a huge Marxist-Leninist movement in the USSR. However, when assessing the ‘significance’ of a leader, it’s crucial that four main themes are taken into account, these being – economics, foreign policy, social change and leadership ability. It can be argued that other leaders of Russia and the USSR have been more ‘significant’ in these areas such as Gorbachev and his foreign policy – including his unorthodox approach to the West which incorporated his “New Thinking” slogan for a policy based on ‘shared moral and ethical principles to solve global problems’1 instead of Lenin’s isolationist approach. The actions of other leaders across these themes have had considerable effects of Russia and the USSR and therefore one can infer from this that Lenin was therefore not the most significant leader of Russia and the USSR.…

    • 3048 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Bolshevik Revolution, Russia was in the traditional economy. Which mean Russia was under-developed country. It both has the advantages and disadvantages. In the traditional economy system, everyone knew the three basic economy questions (what to produce; how to produce; for whom to produce). They produced what their former generation produced. Farming, hunting, and gathering as three basic ways to live were done the same way as the generation before. Also, customs gave the economic decisions that were made. Economic activities were centered round the family or the ethic unit. Needless to say, men and women were given different economic roles and tasks. Men used to produce the product and women had responsibilities on feeding children.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Joseph was exiled to Switzerland. In 1912 Lenin sought out to Stalin and appointed him to serve on the first Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party. November, 1917 Bolsheviks take power in Russia. In 1922 the Soviet Union was formed, Lenin was its first leader. Through the years Stalin climbed up the ladder. After Lenin passed in 1924, Stalin officially came to power of the Soviet Union. In the first few years Stalin launched a series of five-year plans to help transform the Soviet Union to an industrial superpower. He tried to take over farms too, but many refused and those who did either got shot or exiled to Siberia. The forced collectivization led to famine and this killed millions. Stalin was a totalitarian leader, he lead under terror, manipulation, and propaganda. Anyone who stepped out of line under his rule had another thing coming. He sent out secret police to spy on civilians, he had civilians spy on civilians. Stalin was out to eliminate anyone who talked bad about him. In the second half of the 1930s Stalin instituted the “great purges” to try and eliminate what was left of the communist party. In 1941 Germans broke the Non-aggression pact they signed with Russia. Russia and Germany became enemies. After this Russia started to side with Allied powers to help take down the Germans. Some time later Hitler killed himself and the Nazi empire fell. Russia and the U.S. had no common enemy. Tension…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's Power

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Party weakness helped Stalin become head of state as the Politburo was divided into two halves. The left wing, Zinoviev, Trotsky and Kamenev, they wanted to end the NEP , new economic policy, where farmers were allowed to sell food on…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of property. Just as the feudal system had given way to capitalism, so in time…

    • 2447 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    history

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Next there were the economic causes of this revolution. In the 1900s the world was struck by a recession, Russia in particular was heavily affected. They were so affected because Russia relies so much on its exports especially of grain for its revenue and strength of its economy. So when the worldwide price of grain dropped during the recession mass unemployment results due to the fact that 85% of Russia populations are farmers that grow grain and other foodstuffs. Moreover due the recession the…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays