Preview

How Did Grigori Rasputin Political Influence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1355 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Grigori Rasputin Political Influence
An Analysis of Rasputin’s Political Influence

The early 20th Century was a time of huge political turmoil in Russia. In the midst of the turmoil emerged an undisputable mastermind, a man not only capable of mystic healing and sorcery but also of enormous political significance. This man was Grigori Rasputin, a Russian peasant who navigated himself to a position of high command within the imperial government. The motives for Rasputin’s actions have been heavily debated over the course of the last century. This has given rise to the question of whether Rasputin was a true mystic or a political imposter. Initially, Rasputin’s actions purely fulfilled his designated role as a healer to the Empress Alexandra’s son. However, as time passed, Rasputin
…show more content…
The parish register record of 21st January, 1869, notes that “In the village of Pokrovskoye, in the family of the peasant Yefim Yakovlevich Rasputin and his wife, both Orthodox, was born a son, Grigory.” (Joseph T. Fuhrmann, Rasputin: The Untold Story). Grigori was the fifth of nine children – of which only two survived. Little is known about his childhood aside from unreliable accounts from his daughter. It is believed that Grigori never attended school. However, accounts also draw that Grigori compelled mysterious gifts, and was able to command attention. In 1887, Grigori married Praskovia Fyodorovna Dubrovina (1866-1936) with whom he had three children. Grigori was not content with the normality of life and aspired to a greater existence – first spiritually and later socially. Without notice, Grigori left his family and joined a monastery in Verkhoturye. There, he was influenced by a resident hermit who inspired Rasputin to give up meat and drink (the latter only for only for a brief portion of his life). During these years, Rasputin claimed to have had visions. These visions prompted Rasputin to live a life of a wandering mystic. He was highly regarded by many – and was considered a staret – which is an elder mystic. Although Rasputin had a curious manner of speech, his words were powerful. Adding to this, he was able to preach in a …show more content…
In Kiev he attracted the attention of the bishop and members of the upper class. Then, in the same year, Rasputin headed to St. Petersburg to collect donations for the construction of a church. Rasputin carried an introduction to Ivan Stragorodsky, the rector of the theological faculty. Rasputin stayed at Alexander Nevsky Lavra; there he met with Hermogenes Theophanes of Poltava who, amazed by his tenacious memory and psychological perspicacity, offered Rasputin to live in his apartment. As if by intervention, Rasputin befriended Milica of Montenegro and her sister Anastasia – both of whom were interested in Persian mysticism, spiritism and occultism. In November 1905, Milica presented Rasputin to Tsar Nicholas and his wife Alexandra – ultimately changing the course of Rasputin’s life and the political direction of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    This was a disastrous move as it left Alexandra in control back in the cities. She had become increasingly under the influence of the one man who seemingly had the power to help her son, Alexis, afflicted by haemophilia. Alexandra believed that Rasputin was a man of God and referred to him as “Our Friend”. Others, appalled at his influence over the tsarina, called him the “Mad Monk” – though not in public unless they wanted to incur the wrath of Alexandra. Rasputin brought huge disrepute on the Romanov’s. His womanising was well known and he was considered by many to be debauched. Rasputin was a great believer in the maintenance of autocracy. 'The growing influence of Gregory Rasputin over the Romanov’s did a great deal to damage the royal family ' - Historian Chris Trueman. Ironically, with the devastation that World War One was to cause in Russia, it was Rasputin who advised Nicholas not to go to war as he had predicted that Russia would be defeated. As his prophecies seemed to be more and more accurate, his influence within Russia increased. Rasputin had always clashed with the Duma. They saw his position within the monarchy as a direct threat to their position. Alexandra responded to their complaints about Rasputin’s power by introducing legislation that further limited their power. 'Rasputin brought huge disrepute on the Romanov’s ' - Historian Chris Trueman.…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Nicholas, the people suffered from his draconian policies, inciting a series of revolts. The Czar’s significance comes from his role in starting the Russian Revolution, which ended a backwards Russian Empire and created the Soviet Union, a state that influenced the world today. A person today can learn from the Czar’s mistakes and use them in daily life; for example, one can learn to listen to the problems of others before making a major…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Nicholas respected Alexandra’s wishes he ignored the problems Rasputin was causing him and allowed her to have Rasputin around. He also took her advice in appointing ministers as he was unable to be there to make sufficient judgement himself. She rather took advantage of this position and dismissed any ministers that insulted or ridiculed Rasputin,…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rasputin altered the course of a reigning family over an empire of three centuries. The amount Rasputin achieved and managed to change even past his murder was vastly amazing, he attained lots of significant power in a short amount of time during his period spent with the royal family History Learning Site. Grigori Rasputin became a central figure in modern Russian history up until the fall of the Romanov dynasty History Learning Site. When Rasputin entered the home of the Tsar and his family, he ultimately entered the home and lives of the entire country. By ‘miraculously’ saving the life of an ill Tsesarevich Alexei for a brief time in his short life, Rasputin took down the rest of his family and their rule…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many countries, all throughout history, have had their ups and downs; their successes and failures. History is replete with the conquests, conquering, rising and falling of nations. Amongst all these nations sits Russia, which has a rich history full of these features. One era of the Russian nation stands out, and that is the era of the Romanov Dynasty. In the movie, Rasputin: The Dark Servant of Destiny, which covers the closing years of the Romanov Dynasty and its downward spiral during World War 1 under the rule of Tsar Nicholas II, the involvement of an eccentric monk by the name of Rasputin is its focus. While we know the Romanov Dynasty was real, and Rasputin had some impact on the period, just how much impact did Rasputin have on…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book the ”The Family Romanov” there were many tragedies. In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. Another tragedy was that Nicholas’s only son was a hemophiliac. At the end of the book Nicholas, his wife, and his five children died. Karl Marx once said, “History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as farce.”…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II was the last czar of Russia. He was born on the 6th of May 1868 and this day, ominously, turned out to be the Orthodox feast day of St. Job the Sufferer. This seemed to foretell the dangerous and troublesome life that Nicholas had ahead of him (“Czar”). Unlike his father Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov, a giant and intimidating leader, Nicholas was merely 5’6” and had a gentle personality. He was one of the best educated monarchs in Europe because his parents foresaw the obstacles of the 20th century and prepared him for every challenge that he might face. Terrorism constantly threatened the royal family. Nicholas was always surrounded by guards and grew up being very isolated from the outside world. After joining the military, which was expected of him, he enjoyed his carefree life by drinking and attending parties (Hunsucker). Irresponsibility, negligence, and separation from his people kept him from being a successful leader.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    'The growing influence of Gregory Rasputin over the Romanov’s did a great deal to damage the royal family' - Historian Chris Trueman…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The beginning of the 20th century brought radical changes to the social and political structure of autocratic Russia. It was a period of regression, reform, revolution and eradication. Eradication of a blood line that had remained in rule for over 300 years; the Romanov Dynasty. The central figure of this eradication was Tsar Nicholas II, often described as an incompetent leader, absent of the “commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” (Sir G. Buchman, British ambassador to Russia from 1910 in H. Seton-Watson, The Decline of Imperial Russia, 1964, p.108) What caused or defined the decline and eventual fall of the Romanov dynasty cannot concluded by one influencing factor but an amalgamation of Tsar’s leadership, certain events that impacted on Russia and Revolutionary groups that aided this process. From these it is evident though that Tsar Nicholas’ role, to a major extent, was the key factor in the end of the 300-year reigning Romanov rule and subsequent execution. In exploring Russia in the early 20th Century, the revolutionary groups, mainly including the Bolsheviks, can be seen as having a minor role in that actual reason for the decline of the Romanov dynasty but rather a larger role in the events after the fall, in regards to the execution itself and shaping Russia’s future afterwards.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Ivan the Terrible, or Ivan IV, was born on August 25, 1530 to Grand Prince Vasilii and wife Elena Glinskaya. Even at the beginning of his life, it seemed that Ivan IV was going to have a rather unusual childhood, even by noble Russian family standards. His father, Grand Prince Vasilii III, died when Ivan IV was only three years old. So Ivan IV’s time began as child ruler while his mother was regent until her death in 1538 as stated by John M. Thompson in Russia and the Soviet Union…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas Romanov

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicholas II was the last of the Romanov dynasty rule as the Czar of Russia. His rule began on 1st of November and finished on the 15th of 1917. During the time of Nicholas’s reign Russia saw him go from the great and powerful “little father” to a much more dishonorable and weak “bloody Nicholas”. Nicholas II was unsuccessful and the reason behind all of Russia’s many downfalls such as WW1 and the Russo-Japanese war. Bloody Sunday, The October Manifesto and the Russo-Japanese war were all events that support how unsuccessful he was as Czar and prove that he was the worst ruler of his time.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He worried that what he had worked so hard to accomplish would be destroyed by his son who had no lessons in how to rule a country. Nicholas II, as a child, was sheltered from his parents; and the Russian people’s point of views, or beliefs, and he developed an outlook toward his future with “honor, service and tradition” (Atchison). Nicholas enjoyed the military field and had an “excellent education and was perhaps the best educated European monarch of his time.” Nicholas II wanted to please…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The first person to impact the fall of Imperial Russia was Nicholas II, the last Russian Emperor. In particular, Nicholas’ coronation marked the beginning of a downward spiral for the Romanov family. Tsar Nicholas II was born on May 6, 1868 and was the eldest son of Alexander III (Levykin, 1999). Nicholas II had to assume the throne earlier than the Russian population would have liked. Nicholas’ father fell ill in the spring of 1894 and his health never fully recovered. On October 20th, 1894, Alexander III died of nephritis, forcing Nicholas to become the next Tsar of Russia at a young age (Lincoln, 1976). After the untimely death of his father, Nicholas was in dismay about becoming Tsar of Russia, a position he never really wanted. This is exemplified when Nicholas II refers to being the Tsar as, “the awful job I have feared all my life” (Massie, 1967, p. 59). To further Nicholas’ fears, the Russian people and government believed he didn’t have enough political training to rule Russia effectively (Harcave, 1968).…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A conglomeration of domestic issues – amplified by an incompetent leadership in Nicholas II and the parasitic Rasputin – came together to bring 300 years of autocracy to an end. Russia had been ready for change, and the Romanovs had paid the ultimate price. Sources A, B, and C all display differing perspectives of the causes for the collapse of the Romanov dynasty, each with associated judgements on origin, bias, and motive but hold value to the discussion nonetheless. Thus, the fall of the Romanovs was systematic, abdication for Nicholas II inevitable and the winds of change again can be studied by historians and the public to acknowledge this momentous…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays