Preview

How Did Barbarossa Understand The Problems Of Government

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Barbarossa Understand The Problems Of Government
Emperor Frederick 1st approach to problems of government in Germany and how they differ from his measures in Italy.

Emperor Frederick 1st (Barbarossa), was elected to the position of King of Germany at a time when the Kingdom was on the verge of Civil War over rightful inheritance and, the power of the Monarchy had been reduced to little more than that of a Duke or a Count; only holding power over the greatly diminished Crownlands. During his rule, he faced the monumental task of restoring the German Empire to its former glory and re-establishing the power and authority of the Crown once again. Barbarossa would come into conflict over his measures and would face several problems during his attempts to unite the Kingdoms of Germany and Italy
…show more content…
The history of the Germanic Empire directly before Barbarossa's rule was a deeply troubled one, filled with War and Conflict which would lead to the Monarchy's power being diminished to what it was when Barbarossa took over the throne from Conrad the 3rd in 1152. As already stated, Barbarossa ascended the throne at a time when Monarchical power was extremely weak, something which can be attributed in many ways to the Investiture Struggle which had only ended officially in 1122 with the Concordat of Worms. During this strife, which was between the Pope and the Emperor over the Emperors right to appoint Bishops, the German Princes rebelled against the government in 1076 which lead to the undermining of the Crown's authority. With this developed the solely elective nature of the German Crown and paved a move away from the joint elective and hereditary nature of Monarchy in Germany. This in itself was not the downfall of the Crowns power, rather, the need for Henry 4th in 1100 to gift substantial amounts of Crownland to the Princes in order to ensure their loyalty and support, and later the division of the remaining land between Lothar 3rd and Conrad 3rd, again greatly diminishing the land the Crown held to virtually …show more content…
Barbarossa faced different challenges in Germany as he did in Italy, warranting the use of different approaches to the situations. In Germany he faced a divided country at war with itself, with his House being right in the centre, battling with the next most influential House. His decision to cut his losses as such, by his feudal policy and with legitimising such fiefs as those which had already been taken, not with his permission, nor the permission of any king, but at the insistence of the nobles who claimed them. These newly landed nobles took advantage of the situation during the Investiture Struggle in which anarchy descended within Germany due to the existence on two 'Kings'. Barbarossa's intelligent decision not to re-open this closed wound by claiming back the land and titles that had been unlawfully taken, and instead, by legitimising them, created a peace within Germany and gained him valuable allies within his own Vassals, allies whom he would need for his campaign in Italy to be a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Spain, during the Middle ages Spain was under Muslim power until the final expulsion in the 15th century. In the 11th century, a small Christian Spanish Kingdoms started to take to offensive against the Muslim. By the end of the twelve century, Spain was consulted in four different kingdoms: Castle, Aragon, Navarre and Portugal. Castle and Aragon were the two strongest Spanish Kingdoms. In the other hand, Germany and Italy did not create a centralized kingdom because of their weak kings. In Germany, the kings had come to rely on their ability to control the church and elect bishops and abbots as royal administrators. Frederick I tried to create a new kind of empire where Italy might be added as a appendage. He wanted to incorporate Rome and the Papal States into his empire. He had difficulties and finally failed. Frederick II was King of Sicily and King of Germany, and his goal was to establish a centralized state in Italy. Italy was divided in three: the papal states, the kingdom of Sicily and the republic of Venice. The northern Italy cities and the papal states did not want to give their…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GREGORY VII (Hildebrand)

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Henry IV (1050-1106) was Holy Roman emperor and king of Germany from 1056 to 1106. An able, ruthless, and secretive monarch, he led the empire into a disastrous confrontation with Pope Gregory VII in the Investiture Controversy.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two despots underwent years of brutal wars with their neighboring countries in order to expand their territories. Half a year after Frederick II became…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is for certain that the Weimar Constitution had an impact in the effective government of Germany in the years of 1919-33. However, it can be argued from both sides whether this constitution had a negative or positive impact on the effective government. One could say that the constitution was a dominant factor in the ineffectiveness of the government, while on the other hand it could be argued that ineptness of the government is due to other external factors such as defeat and the depression…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frederick the Great, along with his militaristic father, took Prussia from a dwindling spectator along the sidelines of European powers, and placed it on the top. Using his sheer militaristic nature, and the training and discipline of his army, Frederick the Great conquered many of the European armies. His actions lead to the development of the Prussian army. This army would have great influences all the way to World War I.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In august 1756, Frederick II opened what would become the seven years’ war. He did this by invading the neighboring German state of Saxony. Frederick II considered this to be a preemptive strike against a conspiracy by Saxony, Austria, and France to destroy Prussian power. He regarded the invasion as a continuation of the defensive strategy of the convention of Westminster.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Civil Peace Analysis

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Many Germans believed that civil peace was the most effective method of uniting Germany with nationalism in order to win World War I. For example, German Emperor Wilhelm II expresses his gratitude of civil peace at his royal palace in Berlin by saying“I see no more political parties, only Germans...All that matters now is that we Germans stand together like brothers,”(Doc 1). Emperor Wilhelm II emphasizes the importance of German unity to combat the Allies, which means that he supports civil peace; after all, civil peace requires unity in order to defend Germany. Though the concept of civil peace, Emperor Wilhelm II believes that foreign conflicts are far more crucial to the safety of his Germans than domestic issues. However, Emperor Wilhelm II is only semi-credible because he may be insensitive and only view the German soldiers or farmers as pawns on a chessboard rather than valuable human life; this is because he is the person who gives orders, but is not the person who receives the orders. To the German emperor, peace was the most essential element in the…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Investiture Controversy

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This began a two century struggle between popes and emperors. The first part of the struggle is called the “Investiture Controversy” which lasted between 1070 to 1125. This conflict was saw both anti-popes rise and fake emperors talk false claims of legitimacy. The second phase came as the Homenstaufen family, having defeated during the Investiture Controversy, tried to re-instate the faltering empire as a secular, feudal state. In this conflict, the word “holy” was placed in the name of the empire to separate the Empire and the Papacy. The emperors believed the Empire was inheritably sacred and did not need the Pope’s blessing to the Empire. The emperors also still believed Italy was in the Empire, which in turn saw the opposition of the Papal States. After the death of Emperor Frederick II in 1250, the Holy Roman Empire was in complete ruin. The emperors held any local authority if that. The empire would not rise up any more times after that. It was no longer a single “state” but a touchy alliance between princes under a powerless Emperor. “Of the German Nation” was added during the late 14th Century when all of Italy and the rest of Europe were out of the Empire’s…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning there were imperial electors that ran the estates of East Germany and Prussia. When Frederick William came into power as the “Great Elector”, he was able to heavily tax the germanic lands without the consent from the nobles. Taxation allowed for strong dominance over land-owning classes and more importantly, the peasantry. This brought together the Prussian cities and eliminated noble power, thus making Frederick William the absolute ruler. As soon as his son, Frederick William I, came into power, he made sure that all taxation funds were funneled into military power. He transformed Prussia into a disciplined, skilled, military state that would answer to him only through noble commanders. He forced the peasants to fight in the army, and when retired, to provide for the Prussian army and state the agricultural necessities to keep the country going. John McKay exclaims that “with all mean harnessed to the war machine, Prussian civil society became rigid and highly disciplined,” (482). Ultimately, Frederick William and his son were able to ensure a highly absolutist rule through the use of taxes and military motivation. Compared to the Austrian power, the Prussian Empire had a strong foundation of military skill and poise, and continued to push their peasants to the brinking point of…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the fall of Rome a man named Charlemagne tried to build back the empire. At the end of his life raids of people Scandinavia called Vikings started to come in and raid. This made the holy roman empire think of new ways to defend and try to keep the vikings out. These hit and run raids helped shift power to nobles and away from kings.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prussia was once a massive empire, it had a strong military, many different ethnic groups, and a bunch of different leaders, that made the empire better. I will talk about some of the different leaders of Prussia. I will also talk about some of the things that made the military so strong and feared. I will also talk about what happened when Germany and Prussia finally became one. Next I will talk about all of the problems that this new empire had because of religious, and cultural tensions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther - a History

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of these crises that people faced was a decentralized political state. Germany at this time was a group of collective, independent territories under one elected emperor. Each of these territories denied the emperor the ability to rule with authority. Instead, they had their own rulers, such as nobility or members of the clergy. Due to this strain of power, the emperor was unable to maintain a mandate of sorts against Luther and his ‘heretical’ ideas, like the English rulers did against Wyclif.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays