Preview

How Did Alexander II Impact The Russian Czars

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Alexander II Impact The Russian Czars
Russian Czars
After the three partitions of Poland in 1772, 1793, and 1795, there were many more Jews in the Russian empire. The Pale of Settlement was a region in imperial Russia where the Jews were given permanent dwelling. The leaders of Russia were called Czars and they had complete power over the entire empire. This essay will discuss three Russian Czars, Nicholas I, Alexander II, and Alexander III and the impact they had on the Jews. The different levels of tolerance of these Czars to the Jews greatly influenced the quality of Jewish life at the time.

Czar Nicholas I ruled Russia from 1825 to 1855, he came power after his predecessor Czar Alexander I died childless (“Nicholas I”). Although the Jews were in Russia willingly, Czar Nicholas
…show more content…
Alexander III was a huge supporter of Russian nationalism and he reversed many of the liberal approaches started by his father. Alexander III treated the Jews very differently that his father did and more like his grandfather Nicholas I. He encouraged the persecution of non-Russians and was particularly hard on the Jews. Russians at the time were extremely hostile towards the Jews because they were suspected of killed the previous Czar, Alexander II ("ALEXANDER III.ALEXANDROVICH, Emperor of Russia:."). In May 1882 Alexander III’s administration created the May Laws, which restricted the rights of the Jews in Russia. Jews were no longer allowed to live outside of their shtetls, they lost all their property outside of the shtetls, and were no longer allowed to do business on Shabbat (Friedman). This put the Jews in much harsher conditions than they were under Czar Alexander II because it cancelled all the things he had done for them ("Ece/ alexander-III."). During his years as the ruler of Russian Alexander III organized many pogroms against the Jews. Konstantin Pobyedonostsyev was an adviser to the Czar and he was appointed to deal with the Jew problem. As a solution, according to "Pogroms under Czar Alexander III.", “Pobyedonostsyev introduced wide-spread pogroms as a solution. His plan was to absorb one-third of the Jews into the Russian Orthodox Church, force one-third to emigrate and massacre the remaining one-third.” Although this plan was not achieved, it was still a very difficult time for the Jews and there were many pogroms in the 13 years Alexander III ruled. Jewish life at this time was particularly bad because Czar Alexander III hated the Jews. Attacks against the Jews would not have happened during the time of Alexander II’s more tolerant rule. This demonstrates how the level of tolerance of the leaders drastically influences the way the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ivan the Great- Centralized rule; married the niece of the last Byzantine emperor which gave him the chance to asset dominance over all orthodox churches whether in Russia or not. He insisted that Russia had exceeded Byzantine as a third Rome. He called himself “csar” after the Caesar, the :the autocrat of all the Russians.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much like those in Germany, Russian Jews benefited from new freedoms granted in the mid-1800s. Over time they were supplied with the opportunity’s to hold middle-class occupations like business ownership, banking, teaching and manufacturing. This however was met with anger from some non-Jewish Russians, however violence was not used. Sadly, the situation for Russian Jews worsened considerably after the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881. Alexander had been of great assistance to the Jews, with some of his reforms improving conditions for Russia’s Jews. It was found Alexander was murdered by socialist revolutionaries, however many Russians considered socialism and anarchism to be Jewish inventions –therefore meaning the Russian Jews…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan the Terrible, grandson of Ivan The Great was crowned the 1st Tzar of Russia in 1547. Ivan The Terrible was known for his great intelligence yet impulsive outbreaks and rash decisions making throughout his long reign (1533-1584). When both of his parents died he was left to me raised by members of the nobility who often neglected and scorned him. This was said to have been a contribution to his mold into a ruthless individual.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being Tsar or the worlds biggest country, Alexander III had a big challenge ahead of him to keep the Empire together, so he began Russification where he ruled over his multi ethic empire. To help bring unity to this massive empire, everyone was made to use the Russian language and to use the Russian Orthodox Religion. This created a lot of uproar within the Empire, as many couldn’t speak Russian. It took 4 years for Russian to become to official language of the empire. With everything having to be Russian, all official documents had to be written in Russian, all education in schools had to be Russian. This badly affected Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. All of the Jewish communities were persecuted as Alexander III blamed them for the assassination of his father. Over 600 anti-Jewish measured were introduced; for example, only a certain number of Jews were allowed to attend university. Most fled to either USA or Western Europe. The Russification policy was not successful and later led to resentment.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, had neither the qualities nor the desire to rule imperial Russia. Born in Tsarskoye Selo in 1868, Nicholas was the eldest son of Alexander III, the fearsome tsar who had reimposed autocracy and oppression on the Russian empire after the murder of Alexander II. Those who met the young tsarevich, described him as pleasant and likeable, but otherwise unremarkable – hardly the traits of a man ordained by God to rule Russia. Nicholas famously expressed reluctance about taking the throne, declaring that he “never wanted to rule”. But tradition…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsar Alexander I, an intelligent, handsome, benevolent, and aspiring leader ascended onto the Russian throne in 1801 to become one of Russia’s greatest reformers and military leaders. The Tsar who defeated the French Empire was profoundly influenced by their domestic and foreign affairs, leading his vision of Russia to enhance and protect the revolutionary ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. Initially open-minded to these western philosophies Alexander was inspired by his role models to spread these ideas, therefore becoming a “European” rather than just a Russian ruler. Thomas Jefferson who thought quite highly of Alexander, wrote from Monticello in 1806,…

    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His father, Alexander II had allowed reformers to be present in the government. This allowed instability and opposition at times when Russia was not in its better stages. Revolts and rebellions has plagued Russian History and opposed the Tsars in the past. From this, Alexander III wanted to keep reformers out of the Government in an attempt to reduce opposition and keep stability. He was somewhat successful, there were fewer rebellions against the Tsar and stability was in order for long periods of time.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like his father, Nicholas was prepared by his tutor Constantine Pobedonostsev, an extreme nationalist, who instilled in Nicholas a stubborn belief in the divine right of kings and absolute power. Many historians such as George F. Kennan, argue that it was this wholehearted belief and upholding of autocracy, which was in fact, the main reason for the March Revolution in 1917. By 1905, the changing needs of the rapidly industrialized Russia were disregarded by Nicholas, who instead ruthlessly repressed any opposition to the government and its’ autocratic system. Nicholas’ heavy censorship and policing developed a huge level of oppression and discontent amongst the Russian public. Protest was met with relentless violence such as the Bloody Sunday incident on the 22ND January 1905. With over 1000 civilians killed by Nicholas’ army, the massacre which came to be known as “Bloody Sunday” highlighted the regime’s brutal approach and the Tsar’s autocratic unwillingness to address the issues of the Russian population. The incident caused a significant decline in the Tsar’s authority, destroying Nicholas’ image as the people’s benevolent father. Bloody Sunday also triggered widespread protest and revolt, which led to the 1905 revolution. The growing resentment towards Nicholas was furthered after his failure to accept the Duma which he promised in…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every nation dealt with the Jewish people in their own separate way, and the Jewish response in turn, also varied greatly. Prussia, like any other European power, developed a relationship with its Jewish population. What is interesting about this relationship is how quickly it was altered, initially offering the Jews few rights, to then allowing complete citizenship, within the reign of three kings, all within 62 years. The interpreted selections of the aforementioned documents provide clear, concise historical evidence that attest to the argument that Prussia’s relationship with the Jewish people in its territories during the 20th century uniquely and profoundly changed from one of consequential, bureaucratic management to one of nearly unreserved…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the strife and civil unrest of Russia, after the death of Ivan the Terrible in 1584, there was an prevailing demand for a powerful leader ready to rule and reestablish Russia to become more stable, more westernized, and most importantly, to become a reckonable force. Russia answered by providing a czar and a czarina to rebuild Russia and lead it away from the troubles it faced following its Mongolian rule--Peter the Great and Catherine the Great. These two rulers did precisely what was required for them to do for Russia to accelerate and become a nation able to boast its power.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Russian Revolution of 1917 the power of the Zar Nicholas II was overthrown as a consequence; he, his entire family and four of their most loyal servants were arrested in the Ipatiev House until the day of their execution.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II couldn’t stop the progression of revolution as he came to rule at a difficult time. He was out of touch with his people and was known as a leader that was no good, weak, hesitant; and extremely hard-headed. Tsar Nicholas II was at the time mainly concerned with his family issues instead of being focused on the political issues. He was also not prepared to efficiently rule a country where there was a massive variety of people with different languages, race, religion; and culture. It is reported that during Nicholas’s earlier years while his father was still in power, that he found government meetings boring and was not interested in the affairs of state. The Tsar wanted the country to still be ruled as an autocracy where the peasants and the working class had extremely below average standard of living, while the royal family live in a life filled with riches and extravagances.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander the Great is without doubt one of the greatest military leaders of history. Not only did Alexander of Macedon conquer enormous areas of the known world but also he demonstrated dynamic leadership and masterful strategy on a large scale and tactics on the battlefield. During his life, he ruled the largest empire the world had ever seen, which stretched from ancient Greece to India. The son of King Phillip II of Macedon, Alexander was educated by the philosopher Aristotle and first led Macedonian troops at age 18. Many times Alexander was worshipped as a god in some of the countries he ruled. He had a huge impact on world history spreading the seeds of western culture and philosophy across the world and has legends and stories about him in over 80 languages. He was head strong, violent, extremely brave, politically cunning, loved by his men, and a gifted leader. Few individuals have had the sort of impact on history that Alexander did. With his death, what was called the Hellenic Age becomes the Hellenistic. No longer was Greece a minor collection of city states, but a mighty empire. The western world, for better and for worse, became almost a single place, united by a common culture that left its mark on language, literature, and politics.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays