Preview

How Did Alexander II Create Social Change

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Alexander II Create Social Change
Alexander II is the Czar of Russia Nicholas I’s son. Later in time Alexander made multiple reforms that had many consequences on Russia. Russia had a huge lack of development. They had lost a major battle against the combined forces of France, Great Britain, Sardinia, and the Ottoman Empire in 1856. After the war, Alexander decided to make Russia more modern and create social change. By doing this Alexander thought it would make Russia stronger and able to compete with Western Europe for world power. The first of his reforms was to free serfs/laborers in 1861. However the plan only went about halfway. Peasant communities received half of the farmland in the county while Nobles took the other half. In order for other Russians to buy the land
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Alexander II Support The Development Of Russia And Serfs
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Alexander II Support The Development Of Russia And Serfs

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Alexander's Death Affect Eurasia
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Alexander's Death Affect Eurasia

    After Alexander’s death, unfortunately the powerful and mighty empire he built up, rapidly declined. But in these remains, were left people of various races and cultures. Even though Alexander’s premature death was devastating it set the groundwork for a new era that is now known as the Hellenistic Age. During the Hellenistic Age, Alexander was responsible for most of Eurasia’s cultural development and diffusion. There were many advancements made during this era, some regarding medicine, military, and math & mechanical sciences.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Successful Were the Russian Governments in Promoting Economic Change and Modernisation Between 1881-1904?
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Successful Were the Russian Governments in Promoting Economic Change and Modernisation Between 1881-1904?

    Alexander II set the development of a railwail bulding programm and a limited spread of factories. But Russia's economy was still not as well-developed as that in western Europe. So a real industrialisation took of in the reign of Alexander III and the help of Nicholas II's finance minsters Ivan Vyshnegradsky and Sergei Witte.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964
    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Alexander The Great Influence Europe
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Alexander The Great Influence Europe

    In general, the four great military men of the West are Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, and Napoleon. Alexander was the earliest one, he became the king of the Macedonian Empire at the age of 20, a year later he started the expedition to the Persian Empire, he conquered the Persia, Egypt, and northern India before 33 years old, and then dead on the way back .His influence on Europe is very large, affecting many of the great men later.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain How Far Had Russia Progressed From 1855 To 1900?
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Far Had Russia Progressed From 1855 To 1900?

    Alexander ll recognized as the Tsar liberator was known mostly for the emancipation of the serfs. Serfs were the biggest social problem Russia faced as 80% of the population were serfs or state peasants. Serfdom had existed elsewhere in Europe in the 19th century but 1885 Russia was the only major power which kept serfdom. Eventually in 1861 Alexander ll issued an imperial decree which abolished serfdom. This was a huge step for Russia in the 19th century as it showed that they trying to do something about their progression in time. However this did not mean that former serfs were…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.
    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsarist and Soviet Regimes: Terror and Repression during 1855-1964
    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Tsarist and Soviet Regimes: Terror and Repression during 1855-1964

    Alexander ll was seen to be liberal in the early years of his reign as seen in the emancipation of the Serfs in 1861. This gave the Serfs more freedom and basic rights which at this time was a major liberal reform compared to the majority of the previous Tsars, this was by in large Alexander’s greatest reform. The emancipation, he hoped, would lead to greater agricultural output in order to finance the railways, and the beginning of the…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY
    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Draft ESSAY

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Alexander The Great Effective
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Alexander The Great Effective

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq
    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Alexander I Dbq

    Austria and Prussia did not want to offend Alexander, so they joined their kingdoms to Alexander's creation, agreeing with Alexander that the "sublime truths" of Christianity ought to guide relations between nations and guide the domestic affairs of nations. Strong religious conviction, they held, was necessary for maintaining upright and loyal subjects. The rulers of Russia, Austria and Prussia agreed that challenges to their authoritarian rule by liberalism and revolution ought to remain suppressed. Within Russia, Tsar Alexander I had to reform the state of Russia quite a bit as territories such as Poland and Finland were at risk of being lost due to nationalistic movements within them . Therefore, the Tsar decided to try to unify Poland with Russia, giving them a similar constitution to the one in Russia. Being enlightened by western and philosophical theories, Alexander successfully modernized the highly traditional monarchy in Russia and began the process of creating a constitutional monarchy. It was Alexander who felt that the key to successful constitutional rule was the abolition of serfdom, an institution that dominated Russia for more than 600 years, in order to boost the nation’s economy. A plan to abolish…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is Alexander The Great Successful
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Is Alexander The Great Successful

    Alexander the Great. The ruler of Greece from 356-323 B.C.E. He walked right into military and political aspects. Alexander was an awesome young man and wanted the world to know that he would become just as great of a ruler as his father. It was a must that once he gained the power that all should know he was competent in his work. Alexander will forever be recognized for being a dynamic ruler to the people of Greece. For that alone he leaves behind a legacy that will never fade from history.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq Essay
    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander The Great Dbq Essay

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Decembrists Revolt
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Decembrists Revolt

    In the early nineteenth century, Napoleon Bonaparte was conquering much of Europe and was beginning to move his way towards Russia. After Napoleon fled Russia, Alexander led his troops across Europe to beat Napoleon and free the different countries from the French rule. Most of the Russian army had never left Russia and they quickly saw how much more advanced Western Europe was compared to Russia. They were confused as to how the west, who had underwent many years of war and oppression from Napoleon, still lived better than they did. There was a new hope for a constitution since they fought for the rest of Europe and gave them back their freedom, Alexander would grant the same freedoms to the Russians and they had restored their faith in the government and Alexander.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peasants in Russia
    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peasants in Russia

    During the time of Alexander II, the urban working classes hardly existed so there could not be poor conditions for peasantry generally. In freeing the serfs, however, there was a side effect. Serfs fled to the towns and cities looking for work in factories, leading to urbanisation which caused public health problems such as the spread of cholera. In this way, Alexander II carried out a reform that did not help the working class and in turn created poor living conditions for the peasantry. His father, however, showed more interest in developing Russia’s industry which created jobs. He employed Witte to push industrialisation forwards including the expansion of the Trans-Siberian railway. However, like the other tsars, he used the police and army to eliminate any opposition when workers complained about conditions, showing how the peasantry endured great hardship through repression.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics