Preview

How Did Adam Smith Affect Marx's Work

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
726 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Adam Smith Affect Marx's Work
Early in Marx’s career and writings he is dominated by a heavy Hegelian influence, particularly by the Young Hegelians who were radical liberals. In particular Ludwig Feuerbach had a profound effect on Marx’s early works. In contrast Adam Smith’s early life and works were strongly influenced by the literati who were a tight, close-knit group that met at pubs and social clubs to discuss, critique and debate each other’s work. While they both had early influences that would later drastically affect their views and works, Adam Smith was clearly the most influential of the two based on the changes to the Western world and culture. When you look at the political effects of both Smith and Marx’s philosophies you see a world dominated by a capitalist economy and society. This is what Smith’s ideas really valued and why they were valued and adopted by most of the “modern” world. Smith believed that states could flourish on the productiveness of their economies only by rule of law and limited control of banking. Smith also believed that measures that restrict or encourage a …show more content…
Marx claims that this is and exploitation of the worker, and that the worker is the only commodity that produces more value than it is worth. Marx refuses to accept that there is a harmony of interests between the worker and the employer in Capitalism. Marx again attempts to point out a flaw in Capitalism stating, that there is no long term stability or equilibrium, and that it is just an economy of boom and bust. Smith on the other hand argues that a free market economy (Capitalism) leads to economic well being. Smith believed that the main cause of prosperity in a nation was the division of labor. At the same time Smith adamantly opposed mercantilism arguing that the primary advantage of trade was that it opened new markets and allowed for commodities for a lower

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gke1 Task 4 Analysis

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adam Smith, in his book The Wealth of Nations, wrote about the idea that production of wealth would increase if people pursued their self-interest in 1776, just before the Industrial Revolution took off. He went on to describe the division of labor, that is breaking the manufacturing of a product into several easier tasks to be done by separate people, commonly called an assembly line. The Industrial Revolution brought to life Smith 's ideas of division of labor and economic individualism with unrestrained competition, essentially birthing capitalism…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adam Smith is regarded as the father of capitalism due to his work in political economics, specifically production,…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx was a German Philosopher who became famous and controversial for his works on capitalism, communism and dialectical historical materialism. A few of his famous writings were the Das Capital and the Communist Manifesto. These literature have been the guiding principles for the revolution in some countries such as Russia (McLellan, 1). On one hand, John Stuart Mill was a British Philosopher who became famous because of his works on liberty and utilitarianism. But…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were three of the most profound economic philosophers in history. They lived in the midst of a society that was incredibly capitalistic. In 1776 Scotland, Adam Smith published the book, The Wealth of Nations. It was his take on how the capitalist society was something that could flourish over time if it were to operate in a highly functioning manner. Merely 72 years later in 1848, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, both of German decent, published a pamphlet entitled The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith was a Scottish moral philosopher, known for his view and use of capitalism. Smith helped spread the ideology of privatization and free market, and is often credited on creating modern economics. Smith opposed government use and regulation in trade and consumption, arguing it was only a producer and consumers business. Smith lived in an era of mercantilism, and found it useless and unhelpful for trade, and illogical for only benefitting two countries. Smith found specialization key; the idea that a country should keep sacred to what they could produce well and set that good specifically up for trade.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After discussing influence of Marx, author tells the circumstances in which Marx’s social theory came into existence. Marx drew his inspiration from Hegel idealistic philosophy. He was also influenced by English economist Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In the year 1842-43 Marx became the editor of Rheinische Zeintung. During the editorship of Rheinische Zeintung, Marx wrote articles on the freedom of press and against the law which restrict the peasants from wood-gathering from forest. He also wrote about the plight of worker, finally, this paper was banned. Marx travelled from one country to another in Europe and observed the societies very closely; all these visits helped him in the formulation of social theory.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    adam smith

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smiths baptism was on June 16, 1723 in Scotland. Smith attended the University of Glasgow at age 14, later on transferring to Balliol College in Oxford, England. He also spent time tutoring and teaching. Smith is culpable for promoting many of the ideas that built the school of thought that became known as Classical Economics. Laissez Faire philosophies like reducing the role of government intervention and taxation in the free markets and the idea that an invisible hand models supply and demand are key concepts Smiths writing is responsible for advocating. Adam Smith believed if the customer was satisfied and their needs were meet if would be good for both parties. This type of system would be beneficial for a country as a whole because the producer would continue to earn profits and the customers would keep coming back because they are satisfied. This is good for a country because it keeps it thriving.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were both known for their distinct theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that there should be a free market where the producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge buyers the prices that they want. He thought that this would result in the most efficient and desirable economic outcome for consumers and producers. This meant that the consumers would only pay as much or less than they would value the benefit from the good, and the producer would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on making the product. The market would always be equilibrium. There would only be a limited role for the government in the economic system. Karl Marx disagreed and thought that workers would have an advantage because they are already rich and there would be a disadvantage to the poor. The rich would only get richer and the poor would only get poorer. He came out with a theory called the labor theory of value. The claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Marx thought that the two classes in society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy bourgeoisie owns the factories and also dominates the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and hence. Their position on the social status is unchangeable. The poor proletariat are only able to work hard. Marx thought that to fix this problem; the poor would have to revolt and create a new social order where there would be no distinction between segments of society. Adam Smith thought that capitalism was the most ideal economic system. Adam also opposed the idea of revolution to restore justice for the masses because he valued order and stability over relief and oppression. Marx thought that capitalism would lead to instability and injustice in a society. Marx…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his Wealth of Nations, Smith supports the free man's right to work in the economy, even to the lower classes (eg.: freed slaves): "It is the great multiplication of the productions of all the different arts, in consequence of division of labor, which occasions, in a well-governed society, that universal opulence which extends itself to the lowest ranks of people."(Smith, Wealth of Nations,…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Older than Karl Marx, Smith studied at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. He then continued his education at Balliol College at Oxford, studying moral philosophy as well as Latin, history, and English. (Biography, 2). Smith then continued on to become a professor of economics and philosophy, and is best known for his 1776 Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. This book was created in order to show his beliefs on how economies should be run as a best-case scenario in his opinion. This book was widely used as a basis for future economists’ theorem, including Karl Marx, and also helped to accredit Smith with the title of father of modern economics. Prior to writing the book that made him the figurehead for modern economics, Smith wrote a lesser known book in 1759 on the psychological side of economic theory. In this book, Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith projected the ideas he believed in terms of how emotions could affect the individuals in the economy, and to a lesser extent, the economy as a whole through the actions of the individual. These ideas included the concept of two different types of moral values, which could be used to benefit the individual in the economy. These values could be used for what Smith called both “noble” and “commercial” use. When looking at the commercial aspect to his theory, Smith wanted them to be used within business,…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both Adam Smith and Alexis de Tocqueville agree that an individual is the most qualified to make decisions affecting the sphere of the individual as long as those decisions do not violate the law of justice. > From this starting point, each theorist proposes a role of government and comments on human nature and civil society. Smith focuses on economic liberty and the ways in which government can repress this liberty, to the detriment of society. De Tocqueville emphasizes political liberty and the way that government can be organized to promote political liberty, protect individual liberty, and promote civil liberty.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many factories out there will benefit the employees and not taking advantage of them. Marx, on the other hand, thinks differently because employees are working so hard, but the wages are not high enough and it is unfairly paid. Karl Marx, Andrew Ure, and Adam Smith have all different views of the society, however Marx is more convincing because his idea make more sense to many people in the society. There are good and bad things happen in history and that is the life of the people in this world.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    West, E (1990) Adam Smith 's Revolution, Past and Present. Adam Smith 's Legacy: His…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays