Preview

Hotel Financial Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hotel Financial Analysis
Waterfront Mactan Casino Hotel, Inc. (WMCHI)
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Profitability Analysis
2008 0.084266313 0.046495453 0.009816935 0.027953925 2007 0.115098173 0.042234313 0.018062622 0.054801237

Profitability Analysis Return on sales Return On Assets Return On Equity

WMCHI’s net income for 2008 improved by .004 points, but reflected a 50% decline on its ability to use its assets as a source of revenue. Moreover, because of the company’s heavy reliance on borrowings from financial institutions to support its expansion, the return on their stockholder’s equity also went down by more than 50% of 2007’s figures. We can surmise that the company’s operating profit is not sufficient to give its shareholders a satisfying level of retained earnings. What is noticeable is their consistent effort to include the revaluation of surplus property and equipment as an equalizer to their equity level.

Liquidity Analysis
Liquidity Analysis Current Ratio Acid Ratio Current Assets to Total Assets Ratio of Each Current Cash and Cash equivalents Trade & other Accounts Receivable - net Inventories Prepaid expenses and other current assets - net(Notes 8 and 14) Due from a related party Receivable TurnOver Merchandise Inventory(Or Finished Goods) TurnOver Number Of Days Sales Number of Days Supply Working Capital Turnover Cash Defensive Ratio Current Liability Turnover 2008 117.3370297 0.53553076 0.527128819 0.23881858 0.026967364 0.072648861 0.011373797 0.004315201 0.884694776 9.463685998 13.59827423 38.04014631 26.47394764 -0.976096454 27.45949741 0.456322877 2007 99.48689009 0.529819623 0.521567958 0.253578733 0.038227289 0.106578605 0.010017119 0.00555736 0.839619627 15.82459153 28.32739213 22.74940237 12.7085472 -1.900492145 17.57199055 0.893574113

A closer look at WMCHI’s ability to pay existing financial commitments through its liquid assets reflects a weakness as seen from both 2007 and 2008 computed figures of current ratio and acid test. What is also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    96 Balance Sheet 2004 2003 Edwards, Inc. has prepared the following comparative balance sheets Cash $198,000 $102,000 for 2003 and 2004: Receivables $106,000 $78,000 2004 2003 Inventory $100,000 $120,000 Prepaid expenses $12,000 $18,000 Cash $ 198,000 $102,000 Plant assets $840,000 $700,000 Receivables 106,000 78,000 Accumulated depreciation $(300,000) $(250,000) Inventory 100,000 120,000 Patent $102,000 $116,000 Prepaid expenses 12,000 18,000 $1,058,000 $884,000 Plant assets 840,000 700,000 Accounts payable $102,000 $112,000 Accumulated depreciation (300,000) (250,000) Accrued liabilities $40,000 $28,000 Patent 102,000 116,000 Mortgage payable $- $300,000 Preferred…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Debt to Equity ratio | 0.34 | 0.001 | | | | Current asset | 501,192 | 406,221 | Current liabilities | 157,453 | 123,054 | Working capital | 343,739 | 282,554 | Current ratio | 3.3 | 3.18 | Acid test ratio | 0.55 | 0.26 |…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In regards to the past performance of the Westover inn, it is clear to see that the inn has been an underperformer in regards to recording any positive net income. Despite the consistent years in failure to produce a positive income, the trend is clear that progression is being made as each year has shown an increase in profit and revenue. This has much to do with the productive way of reducing expenses and the inn gaining more recognition and consistent clientele. A clear issue the inn has faced has been has been the trouble of repaying its interest on their original investments as seen with a times covered ratio.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hcs/405 Week 4 Lt Ratios

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2008 Ratio (unaudited) 2009 Ratio (unaudited) 2008 Ratio (audited) 2009 Ratio (audited) Current Ratio Current Ratio Current Ratio Current Ratio $130,026 Assets $8,380 Liabilities 15.52 to 1 $128,867 Assets $23,807 Liabilities 5.41 to 1 $130,026 Assets $8,380 Liabilities 15.52 to 1 $128,867 Assets $ 23,807 Liabilities 5.37 to 1 Quick Ratio Quick Ratio Quick Ratio Quick Ratio $41,851 $37,666 $79,517 / $8,380 9.49 to 1 $22,995 $59,787 $82,782 / $23,807 3.48 to 1 $41,851 + $37,666 / $8380 9.49 to 1 $22,995 + $58,787 / $23,807 3.44 to 1 Days Cash on Hand Days Cash on Hand Days Cash on Hand Days Cash on Hand $437,424 ($24,955) $412,469 / 365 = $1,130.05 $41,851 / $ 1,130.05 = 37.04 days $462,293 ($36,036)…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUSN 5200 W4 Homework

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comments on liquidity: Cannot tell if these ratios are good or bad without more information on the company’s situation or past years.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC/291 March 25,2012 Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times 2004 $37,480,050/ ($7,854,112+8,074,880/2) $37,480,050/ $7,964,496=4.71 times Profitability Ratios Current Assets 2004 2005…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Total Assets from the company represent a figure of 21,300 in the latest year, which represent a decrease of 3.82% from the previous year. The Current Assets sum up a total of 30.44% and 32.31% of the Total Assets as of January 2009 and January 2010 dates respectively, which represent a real growth, between the dates, of $142 to reach the $6,882. Part of this growth is due to the increase of 29.1% of the Cash and Cash Equivalents account, which in the later date is valued as $1,686; it also increase its participation in the total assets from 5.9% to 7.92% from one year to another. Also worthwhile mentioning is the significant reduction of the Accounts Receivable of 18.45% which varied $81 from the $439 figure we had in the FY08.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Round1

    • 6248 Words
    • 25 Pages

    ROS Asset Turnover ROA Leverage (Assets/Equity) ROE Emergency Loan Sales EBIT Profits Cumulative Profit SG&A / Sales Contrib. Margin % Andrews 12.9% 1.03 13.3% 1.4 19.1% $306,861 $199,687,417 $46,007,047 $25,674,379 $167,921,337 14.6% 46.1% Baldwin 2.2% 1.33 2.9% 1.3 3.7% $0 $84,459,254 $4,049,665 $1,820,056 ($9,663,431) 18.2% 23.8% Chester -7.7% 0.64 -4.9% 2.5 -12.2% $19,862,027 $87,014,031 ($1,781,903) ($6,734,381) $37,696,776 24.3% 34.2% Digby 5.9% 0.55 3.3% 1.4 4.4% $19,116,490 $157,535,095 $22,114,930 $9,325,756 $50,585,060 13.6% 44.5% Erie 16.0% 1.22 19.5% 1.6 30.3% $0 $244,661,715 $70,174,142 $39,239,433 $100,679,872 12.9% 49.3% Ferris -5.0% 1.08 -5.4% 2.2 -12.0% $0 $125,722,474 ($4,760,338) ($6,271,878) ($2,658,141) 17.6% 22.4%…

    • 6248 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tootsie Roll

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8.2% Net Sales $495,592 $5,298,668 Inventory Turnover Cost of Goods Sold $318,645 5.7 $3,245,531 5.8 Average Inventory ((Current Inventory + Previous Inventory) / 2) $55,986 Times $556,121 Times Days in Inventory 365 Days 365 = 64 365 = 63 Inventory turnover 5.7 Days 5.8 Days Receivable Turnover Ratio Net credit sales $495,592 = 14.4 $5,298,668 = 12.24 Average Net Receivables ((Current Accounts Receivable + Previous Accounts Receivable) / 2) $34,363 $432,772 Average Collection Period 365 365 =…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The net profit in year 2005 is 2.28%, very low net profit looking at the markets of the same industries. (See Exhibit 1)…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to figure 1 the net profit margin of Rio Tinto in the year 2010 fell from27.4% to 11.2% in the year 2011. (net profit margin is equal to net profit after tax divided by sales revenue) The profit rate to net worth of this company in the year is 5.8 %.(profit rate to net worth is net profit after tax divided by average total assets) The investors should use comprehensive income figure rather than net profit because comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period.(comprehensive income is equal to net profit plus other comprehensive income) The operating cash flow increased by $US3,858 million from $US23,530 million in the year 2010 to $US27,388 million in the year 2011 meanwhile, the sales raised by $US5,366 million from $US55,171 millionin the year 2010 to 60,537 million US$ in the year 2011. This matter of fact indicates Rio Tinto expended $US1,580 million on operating the company. The…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    100 102 110 112 120 130 140 141 142 150 151 160 161 210 220 221 222 225 250 300 301 Total Name Cash Short-term Investments ARC - Accounts Receivable Control Interest Receivable Merchandise Inventory Office Supplies Prepaid Rent Prepaid Advertising Prepaid Insurance Office Furniture Accum Depn: Office Furniture Office Equipment Accum Depn: Office Equipment APC - Accounts Payable Control Wages Payable Electricity Payable Water Payable Interest Payable Bank Loan Payable Common Stock Retained Earnings Debit ($) 29,477 20,000 12,570 73,322 7,083 6,000 9,000 2,950 9,000 2,031 43,000 13,532 16,438 Credit ($)…

    • 3899 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ACC Project

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    b) In 2009, P&G had $8,996 million (21,905 – 30,901) in working capital; their acid- test ratio was .34 times ((4,781+5,836)/30,901); and the current ratio was .71 times (21,905/30,901). Based on the ratios above, P&G’s liquidity is very poor. The acid-test and current ratios are both below a 1, indicating that they have current assets tied up. They may not do that well in the event of an economic crisis and are not as liquid as they should be.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Value Line Investment Survey, Edition 5, Part 3 - Ratings and Reports. April 7, 2000.…

    • 18749 Words
    • 75 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In relation to the Balance Sheet, the Operating director of M&S referred to it as’ A strong Balance Sheet that underpins our future plans to invest’ and the figures seem to reiterate this message (M&S annual Report 2008, pg 9). During the last year M&S has seen increases in its current and non-current Assets, particularly in areas…

    • 3962 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays