Preview

Hospers vs. Descartes: Knowledge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
956 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hospers vs. Descartes: Knowledge
There are three standard ways in which we apply the word “know”: 1. I know who a person is, 2. I know how to do something, and 3. I know that something is the way it is. The third of the previously listed kinds of knowledge is the propositional case: “I know that” is followed by a proposition. For example, “I know that I am now typing up my précis”. Hospers discusses the propositional condition of knowledge. There are three essential components to propositional knowledge: truth, belief, and evidence. Truth and belief are fairly straightforward concepts; evidence, however, is controversial. Yes, we all agree that in order to know something, there must be evidence that backs up that knowledge. For example, suppose you believe the moon is actually a cupcake, but it isn’t until years after your death that scientists discover that the moon indeed is a cupcake. Even though it is true that the moon is a cupcake, you did not have any evidence supporting your claim during your lifetime, thus your knowledge of the cupcake moon was actually a shot-in-the-dark, lucky guess. Therefore, beyond truth and belief, knowledge requires evidence. The question is, how much evidence does knowledge require? This is where controversy arises… In order for somebody to know something without a shadow of a doubt, does not the evidence have to be complete? In other words, is evidence ever adequate if it is not 100% complete? Furthermore, is it even possible to know a proposition if there is anything less than every single bit of evidence required of that proposition? There are two different senses of “know”: there is a weak sense and there is a strong sense. According to the weak sense, something can be known when it is believed, when there is strong enough evidence for it, and when it is true. On the other hand, according to the strong sense, something can be known when it is true, when it is believed, and when there is absolute conclusive evidence. We most often use the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When you know something you not only have an opinion, but that opinion is true. We can't just say because we believe something, it is certain. Although everything we know is also certain, not everything we think is certain is known. A person can be certain about something that is true but in fact is, he can be wrong about it. Certainty and doubt go hand in hand because too much certainty can make a person close-minded and ignorant. Not willing to accept facts based on illogical connections to the opinions of others that have an influence strong enough to cause an irrational mental model of what is acceptable to base future opinions on and this leads…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contemporary philosophers usually define knowledge as justified true belief. In order to claim that someone has knowledge of something, all three conditions have to be met. First is that the statement must be true. I can't claim to know that Elvis Presley…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donovan Implications

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages

    We laugh about the person who says, ‘I know I’m right; don’t confuse me with arguments’. And yet there are times when we find ourselves wanting to say that too. For there are situations in which we feel sure that we know something, even though if asked to give a good argument to back up our claim we are at a loss to know quite how to do so. ‘I know you’re the person I spoke to on the bus yesterday.’ ‘I know I have two hands.’ ‘I know it is wrong to let that child starve.’ ‘I know that six minus four leaves two.’ Our experience of being confident that we are right in cases like those is often called intuition. Intuitive knowing seems to be a direct, convincing way of knowing, which needs no further argument. And it is a perfectly ordinary, everyday occurrence as those examples show.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. It is important because, if you don’t have the right evidence and facts, you can’t find the criminal that did the crime. You might have evidence but the evidence could be false and you might take an innocent man and put him through trial for something he didn’t even do. So it is important to use the proper methods when you are collecting evidence.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The study of knowledge, or epistemology, contains theoretical methods in which information is learned. Of these methods, there are two that are most widely accepted. Rationalism and empiricism are also the most widely debated methods of knowledge. Rationalism claims that a priori processes and intuition gain knowledge. Rationalism claims that knowledge is innate; but that it varies among humans. At the other end of the spectrum, empiricism claims that knowledge is gained largely by experience, observation, and sensory perception.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainty vs doubt

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Certainty and doubt comes from experience. A two-year-old girl may doubt that fire is hot and dangerous. Verbal evidence would have already been given to her by that age by her parents or the adults around her. Visual evidence would have been given by television; television or commercials show people touching fire, and getting hurt. Those pieces of evidence would only suit the girl for a short amount of time. After the allotted amount of time, the girl would want to experience fire first-hand. The child will realize that fire is hot and dangerous once it burns her. Certainty has now set-in. When the girl grows up, she will forever know that fire is hot and can possibly hurt her. Any claim who contradicts her experience, she will have doubt it. From past experiences, she has established, certainly, that fir is hot. Doubt is elicited in the opposing statement, when a claim opposes all evidence she has received. Doubt and certainty are both present and are aware of each other. Doubt and Certainty do not have to be on the same claim, but inhabit the same idea.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study of Knowledge

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Knowledge and the confirmation of knowledge can be confirmed by propositional and procedural knowledge or knowledge by acquaintance. Propositional knowledge is expressed in declarative sentences or indicative propositions of one’s knowledge based on the known or knowing that. If someone says “all birds have feathers” they are stating or asserting a proposition that is factual or somewhat factual. Procedural knowledge is the knowledge used in the performance of a task, such as knowing how to replace brakes on a vehicle. It is learned knowledge through doing that act. Knowledge by acquaintance is experience based knowledge learned through casual interaction, such as knowing a place or person well (Mosser, 2010).…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    32.) Evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable that it would be without the evidence is called: Relevant evidence?…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Over The Family

    • 4679 Words
    • 19 Pages

    PENGUIN BOOKS THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF REALITY Peter L. Berger is Professor of Sociology at Boston University and Director of the Institute for the Study of Economic Culture. He has previously been Professor of Sociology at Rutgers University, New Jersey, and in the Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Research in New York. He is the author of many books including Invitation to Sociology, Pyramids of Saa!fice, Facing up to Modernity, The Heretical Imperative and The Capitalist Revolution, and is co-author (with Hansfried Kellner) of Sociology Reinterpreted and (with Br igitte Berger) of Sociology: A Biographical Approach and The War over the Family.…

    • 4679 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relevant evidence is evidence has the tendency to make facts foreseeable more then it would be without evidence. Although certain evidence may be relevant in some cases evidence may be excluded from trial for no rational relevance. The reason to exclude important evidence like this is because; it has the likelihood to influence the minds of the jury. An example of evidence that would be excluded during a trial would be gruesome photographs of victims in a homicide case; although it may be relevant to the case it could prejudice the minds of the jury. In some cases relevant evidence may be excluded to prevent confusion or if present it could create more issue, therefore wasting trial time if…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many attempts have been made throughout the years in order to understand what knowledge truly is. The concept of knowing a proposition is still a matter that is highly controversial and although there are many different models, the traditional and most widely accepted model used is the…

    • 1699 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Account Of Knowledge

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In other words, S knows that P if and only if S has a justified, true, belief concerning P. The necessity of the first condition is obvious, since it can not be the case that we have knowledge of something that is false. It also seems obvious that we do not have knowledge of P if we do not believe that P. Can we claim to have knowledge of something we don’t believe? The last condition is the only one of the three that may not seem immediately obvious; however, if our knowledge wasn’t justified, then it would be nothing more than a lucky guess1.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Innate Knowledge

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    knowledge has to be significant enough for us to recount to be considered such. Thus, there…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is passionate conviction ever sufficient for justifying knowledge?…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    01

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page

    Evidence is important because it gives you clues as to what happened in the crime and who committed that crime. The evidence that was important in the episode was the beer can. It was important because it gave clues to how the accident happened and/or who drinks it.…

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays