Preview

Hominid Evolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hominid Evolution
Hominid Evolution

The evolution of hominids has been and still is a heated topic of debate. Many scientists

debate over which species can be classified as “human”. The root "hominid" refers to members

of the family of humans, Hominidae, which consists of all species on our side of the last

common ancestor of humans and living apes. The time split between humans and living apes

used to be thought of fifteen to twenty millions of years ago, but now the time period has shifted

to around five million years ago.

Ardipithecus ramidus is said to have live around 4.4 million years ago. The original

fossils from this species were placed with the Australopithecus genus; however, a new genus was

designated to this group by Tim White. Tim White is an anthropologist and co-author of

Geological Study of America Bulletin in which this distinction was first stated. This hominid is

different from its predecessors because it lacks an incisor tooth, yet posses an ape-like molar

structure. Another major defining characteristic of A. ramidus is that the cranial bones that have

been discovered reveal this hominid walked on four appendages rather that the more developed

species which walked on two.

The next hominid in line is Australopithecus anamensis. This hominid lived for the

period of 3.5-4.17 million years ago. It was discovered by a Harvard Expedition to the East Lake

Turkana in 1995. The classification of A. anamensis was done after extensive research by Meave

Leakey and associates. The skeletal structure of this hominid reveals that it was bipedal

(walking on two legs) which distinguishes it distinctly from A. ramidus. However, A. anamensis

possessed some traits that were similar to hominids before it such as a dental structure that is

similar to that of an ape and an ape-like skull. On the other hand, this hominid has an unique

thick tooth enamel and expanded molars.

Between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago, Australopithecus

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Postorbital ring 2. Dental comb 3. Tapetum Lucidum Tarsiers more like monkeys in their genetics Primate Fossil Ancestry: Events Preceding Primates Ca. 500 MYA: first vertebrates in fossil record Ca. 250 MYA: Pangea II forms- nearly all land is one big continent Ca.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ardipithecus Ramidus

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Terrestrially, Ardi was involved with a form of bipedality that was considered to be primitive than those of the Australopithecus species (). Furthermore, Ardi did not adaptat to "heavy" chewing related to open environments (). Therefore, Ardipithecus ramidus determined the last common ancestors of humans and African apes were not similar to chimpanzees at all (). Thus, Ardipithecus ramidus, chimpanzees, and gorillas are…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    bio asesmnet unit 2

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Which of the following species, in the human evolutionary line, are believed to have been bipedal…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Australopithecines can be defined as hominids from the Plio-Pleistocene era in Africa characterized by bipedal locomotion and a relatively small brain. Paranthropucines are similar to Australopithecines except they are defined as more robust, that is they have much larger teeth and larger jaws meant to process tough foods. The Mystery Specimen from Station 5 resembles both Australopithecus afarensis and Paranthropus boisei, but because it has a sagittal crest, it must be a Paranthropus. It's primitive features are slight prognathism and a relatively small neurocranium. Its derived features include large molars, a wide flat face, and a sagittal…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bruce Bowers article, “Fossils hint at India’s crucial role in primate evolution” published in September of 2016, gives the theory of how certain bones excavated from a coal mine in India resemble the first primates from as early as 65 million years ago (). This article states how these bones approximately reveal how a common ancestor would look like and act. Researchers believe that since having the qualities of both superfamilies, Adapoidea and Omomyoidea they left behind a large quantity of different skeletal traits. With the idea that the evolution of primates and their relatives occurred on an isolated island of idea then spread, that gives them the time to evolve and have the specific bone structure and abilities that key them into being…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Hominins: Modern humans and all extinct species more closely related to humans than chimps and bonobos…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hominid – more narrow meaning; confined to those twigs of the evolutionary tree that are more colosed related to us than any other species…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of the status of Neanderthal man has been hotly contested in the anthropology world. It is the matter of whether Homo Sapiens are the decedents of Neanderthals or whether they are cousins with a common ancestor. If Neanderthals are considered to be a proper descendent to Homo Sapiens, then they can be rightfully classified as Homo Sapiens Neanderthal. If they are truly a separate species, then they should be classified as Homo Neanderthal.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Order Primate Analysis

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many processes have taken place to shape humans from the Australopithecus Afarensis to the modern day human also known as the Homo Sapien. As a result, the two defining traits that occurred by taxonomy are the effects of brain size and bipedalism. Humans, like other primates are considered as Order Primates in the Hominidae family and therefore are a prime example of taxonomy when the two diverged into different species. During taxonomy when humans diverged from their ancestors 6 to 7 million years ago, the result is the differences such as walking upright, brain size and overall skeletal structure are prominent due to the divergence of humans and other primates. Although primates and humans both share many anatomical, behavioral and socialization traits the differences are drastic and are all a result of selective pressures.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since humans and other primates share a variety of characteristics, other primates provide important observations about early humans. Homologies between hominids and other primates enhance to behavior because the physiological and cognitive formations that manage to control human demeanor are likely related to those of other primates than to members of other taxonomic groups. The reality of this broad collection of homologous traits, the commodity of the average evolutionary history of the primates, means that nonhuman primates give beneficial examples for understanding the evolutionary ancestry of hominid morphology and for resolving the basis of human nature.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Evolution Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A group of scientists lead by Biren Patel have recently found a partial mandible of an ancient primate related to lemurs. Scientists have named the new species Ramadapis sahnii and claim that it existed 11 to 14 million years ago, and is a member of the early primate family Sivaladapidae. Analysis of the jawbone shows that the species consumed leaves and was approximately the same size as a house cat, or to a modern day lemur. This discovery is important to the scientific community as with this discovery more information surrounding the evolutionary history of primates can be gathered and analysed. This new species will also help expand the phylogenetic tree for primates, making it significant to any scientist researching primate evolution.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Essence of Anthropology,” chapter four explains “Humans have a long evolutionary history as mammals and primates that set the stage for the cultural beings we are today” (Haviland, Prins, Walrath & McBride 2007). The appearance of the world has been continuously changing for millions of years. The continental drift has a large factor in this change to the world itself. The continental drift forced the position of the continents to move through the movement of plate tectonics. The visible continents, attached to plate tectonics upon which they ride, would shift slowly over time as a result. This is the geological process that is responsible for climate changes in different environments that has influenced the course of evolution for our ancestors, the hominoids (Haviland, Prins, Walrath & McBride 2007). Through the continental drift, Africa has gone from complete rainforest to mostly dry land. With primates being established living within the rainforest atmosphere and hanging in trees constantly, the change into more of a savannah environment has constructed more open land. With less trees and more land, primates at this time adapted the ability to walk on two feet, rather than all four (Snyder, 1/24/12). Hominoids have the classification of apes and humans. We are alike mostly by having no tail, a larger brain and being able to walk upright on two feet (Snyder, 1/24/12). Australopithecines were the first definite hominoids. In “The Essences of Anthropology,” chapter four states “The earliest definite australopithecine fossils date back 4.2 million years ago”(Haviland, Prins, Walrath & McBride 2007). Australopithecines were categorized into robust or gracile and lived in eastern and southern parts of Africa. Robust, meaning they had a strong chewing apparatus; while gracile australopithecines possessed more of a delicate chewing apparatus (Haviland, Prins, Walrath & McBride 2007). Homo habilis was the next…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early man study sheet

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ape features: -brain size 450-500cc -a lot of body hair –brow ridge –large teeth –flat noise –jutting jaw…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays