While the author had a clear thesis statement, he presented only his own point of view, thus producing an article that had no balance. Most of his statements were general and lacked support. For example, Salies said that the will not’s, an arbitrary group of homeless people, choose to live on the streets. He further characterized this group as thieves and scam artists. Another reason the article failed was the manner in which the information was presented. Rather than appealing to the reader’s intelligence, Salies played on the reader’s emotions. The homeless were presented as a happy group (“take delight in sharing tales of derring-do”) who lead a carefree, if not enviable life (“The rest of the day is spent in an alcoholic stupor among friends, laughing, crying, joking…”). The reader, then, no longer views these homeless as needing his sympathy and help, but rather as a group to be shoved out of sight and onto another
While the author had a clear thesis statement, he presented only his own point of view, thus producing an article that had no balance. Most of his statements were general and lacked support. For example, Salies said that the will not’s, an arbitrary group of homeless people, choose to live on the streets. He further characterized this group as thieves and scam artists. Another reason the article failed was the manner in which the information was presented. Rather than appealing to the reader’s intelligence, Salies played on the reader’s emotions. The homeless were presented as a happy group (“take delight in sharing tales of derring-do”) who lead a carefree, if not enviable life (“The rest of the day is spent in an alcoholic stupor among friends, laughing, crying, joking…”). The reader, then, no longer views these homeless as needing his sympathy and help, but rather as a group to be shoved out of sight and onto another