hoc tap

Topics: Strategic management, Google, Management Pages: 17 (6083 words) Published: May 31, 2014
Article No 3
Media Convergence and Business Ecosystems
Nabyla Daidj, Ph.D.
Institute Telecom
Telecom Business School, France
Head of Department of Management, Marketing and Strategy
Apple, Google, Microsoft, convergence, diversification, strategic alliance, business ecosystem Abstract
Because the markets in which Apple, Google and Microsoft compete are characterized by rapid technological advances, their ability to compete successfully is dependent on their strategies to ensure the launch of competitive products, services and technologies. This paper focuses on convergence and links with the reconfiguration of value chains in the “new media” sector and diversification strategies adopted by the three companies. As these organizations are made up of different business units, a question arises to how resources and competencies are to be allocated across these businesses. Performance and profitability are determined by an organization’s resources and competencies. The different modes of growth (strategic alliances, partnerships, mergers & acquisitions) and in particular, the emergence of business ecosystems will be analysed. Introduction

Since the beginning of the 1990s, the strategies employed by today’s media and telecommunication companies have led to increased concentration within the industry. In part, this concentration can be explained by worldwide deregulation and privatization trends. This, in turn, has contributed to a decrease in so-called natural monopoly structures. The digitalization and convergence of information and communication technologies (ICT) has also had a significant impact on media business strategy. In addition, the development of digital and interactive technologies has accelerated the erosion of the existing frontiers between the media industries (Peltier, 2004)  The result has been the creation of an entirely new set of actors (Internet giants, telecommunications service providers etc.) who now compete directly with many of the established players in the field of media and telecommunications. In this paper, we start with a discussion of convergence.  We describe the role of the technological convergence in creating and adding value for such companies as Apple, Google and Microsoft. The goal of this research is to look at how convergence has impacted the business strategy of such companies as Apple, Google and Microsoft.  This paper is divided into two parts. Part 1 examines product line strategy.  Apple began with the launch of its iPod followed by iTunes (2003) and iPhone in 2007.  Microsoft, for its part, entered into the world of videogame technology with the launch of its X-box video game system in 2001.  Google is best known for its search engine which has been the catalyst for other technologies and software innovations. Part 2 focuses on convergence with special consideration given to the importance of value chains, the evolution of the different players’ positioning and their related strategies. The different modes of growth (mergers & acquisitions, partnerships and alliance) are at the heart of complex networks between companies leading to the development of business ecosystems.  BUILDING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES IN A CONVERGENT ENVIRONMENT

In this section, I propose an analytical framework for examining the external factors (mainly the drivers of convergence) that have influenced the strategic choices of Apple, Google and Microsoft by enabling them to compete in a global marketplace. These external factors have reshaped Apple, and Microsoft and their successful efforts to compete with the players of the new economy such as Google. Changes in the information industries

Convergence is a buzz-word (Lind, 2005). Wirth (2006) developed a review of literature underlining the fact that “one of the challenges of studying media convergence is that the concept is so broad that it has multiples meanings” (p. 446). Scholars differ in their opinions on the extent and effect of...

References: Badaracco, J.L. Jr. (1991). The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Baldwin, C.Y, Clark, K.B. (2000). Design Rules. The Power of Modularity (Volume 1).  MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
Bengtsson, M., Kock, S. (2003). Tension in Co-opetition. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Academy of Marketing Science, May 28th-31st. Washington D.C.
Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J. (1995). The Right Game: Use Game theory to Shape Strategy.Harvard Business Review, July-August, 57-71.
Brandenburger A.M., Nalebuff B.J. (1996). Co-opetition, Currency/Doubleday, New York.
Brookey, R.A (2006). The Magician and the iPod: Steve Jobs as Industry Hero. In L. Küng (ed.), Leadership in the Media Industry. Changing Contexts, Emerging Challenges (107-121).
Cardoso, A. (1996). The Multimedia content industry: Strategies and Competencies. International Journal of Technology Management, 12(3), 253-270.
Carpenter, M.A., & Sanders G.Wm. (2007). Strategic Management. A Dynamic Perspective, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Chatterjee S., & Wernerfelt B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 33-48.
Chon, B.S., Choi, J.H., Barnett, G.A., Danowski, J.A., & Joo, S-H. (2003). A structural analysis of media convergence: cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. Journal of Media Economics, 16 (3), 141-157.
Daidj, N. (2011 forthcoming). Les écosystèmes d’affaires : une nouvelle forme d’organisation en réseau ?, Revue Management & Avenir (Business ecosystems: a new form of network organization?).
Daidj, N., Grazia, Ch., Hammoudi, A. (2010). Introduction to the non-cooperative approach to forming coalitions: the case of the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD standards’ war. Journal of Media Economics, 23(4), 192-215.
Daidj, N., Isckia, T. (2009). Entering the Economic Models of Game Console Manufacturers.Communications & Strategies, 73(1), 23-42.
Darroch, J. (2003). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115.
Dussauge,  P., & Garrette,  B. (1991). Alliances stratégiques, mode d’emploi. Revue Française de gestion, septembre-octobre, 4-18.
Fransman, M. (2002). Telecoms in the Internet Age: From Boom to Bust to …? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Winner of the 2003 Wadsworth Prize. (Review, Financial Times, October 16, 2002).
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, Harvard Business School Press.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2008). How Companies Become Platform Leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2).
Gehani, R.R. (2002). Chester Barnard 's "executive" and the knowledge-based firm. Management Decision, 40(10), 980-991.
Gershon, R. (2005). The transnationals: Media corporations, international trade and entertainment flows. In A. Cooper-Chen (Ed.), Global Entertainment Media. Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates (17-35).
Gershon, R. (2000). The Transnational Media Corporation: Environmental Scanning and Strategy Formulation. Journal of Media Economics, 13 (2), 81-101.
Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based Theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, Special Winter Issue, 109-122.
Grant, R.M. (2005). Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Fifth Edition. Blackwell Publishing.
Hoopes, D., Madsen, T., & Walker, G. (2003). Why is there a resource based view. 
Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10), 889-902.
Iansiti, M.,&  Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 68-78.
Inkpen, A. C. (1997). An Examination of Knowledge Management in International Joint-Ventures. In P. Beamish & J. P. Killing (Eds.). Cooperative Strategies-North American Perspectives). San Francisco: New Lexington (337- 369).
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy, 8th Edition. Pearson Education Limited, England.
Küng, L. (2006). Leadership in the Media Industry. Changing Contexts, Emerging Challenges. JIBS Research Reports, No. 2006-1.
Lawson-Borders, G. (2003). Integrating new media and old media: Seven observations of convergence as a strategy for best practices in media organizations.  International Journal of Media Management, 5, 91-99.
Liebeskind, J., Oliver, A., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms. Organization Science 4, 428-443.
Lind, J. (2005). Ubiquitous Convergence: market redefinitions generated by technological change and the Industry Life Cycle. Paper for the DRUID Academy Winter 2005 Conference, January 27 – 29.
Lundvall, B-Å., & Nielsen, P. (2007). Knowledge management and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 207-223.
Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2),129-144.
Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Moore, J.F. (1996).  The Death of Competition – Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, New York: Harper Business.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyström, A. (2008). Understanding Change Processes in Business Networks: A Study of Convergence in Finnish Telecommunications 1985-2005, PhD Thesis, Abo Akademi University.
Peltier, S. (2004). Mergers and Acquisitions in the Media Industries: Were failures really Unforeseeable?Journal of Media Economics, 17 (4), 261-278.
Peteraf, M.A. (1993). The Cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14,179-191.
Picard, G. R. (2000). Changing business models of online content services: Their implications for multimedia and other content producers. The International Journal on Media Management, 2(2), 60–68.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. The Free Press: New York.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
Porter M., & Fuller M.B. (1986). Coalitions and Global Strategy. In M. Porter (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press, (315-343).
Powell, W.W. (1998). Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228-240.
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79-91.
Stipp, H. (1999). Convergence now. The International Journal on Media Management, 1(1), 10-13.
Teece, D.(1992). Competition, co-operation, and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 18(1), 1–25.
Thielmann, B., Dowling, M. (1999). Converge and innovation strategy for service provision in emerging web-TV markets. The International Journal on Media Management, 1(1), 4-9.
Wernerfelt, B (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
Wernerfelt, B (1989). From critical resources lo corporate strategy. Journal of General Management, 14, 4-12.
Wirth M.O (2006). Issues in Media Convergence. In A.B. Albarran, S. Chan-Olmsted, M.O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics, Laurence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Wirtz, B.W (2001). Reconfiguration of value chains in converging media and communications markets.Long Range Planning, 34(4), 489-506.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Tap Dancing
  • Tap Dance Essay
  • Tap Water Essay
  • Persuasive Tap Water Essay
  • Tap Water Pros and Cons Research Paper
  • Is It Healthier to Drink Bottled Water or Tap Water? Essay
  • Bottle V Tap Essay
  • Tap water Vs bottled water Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free