Preview

Hobbes Vs Socrates Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
410 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes Vs Socrates Essay
In Hobbes Leviathan, one might recognize the complete controversy between he, and Socrates. Socrates, was a man with little answers; he made you question things you did not know, and things you thought you knew. However, Hobbes, gives you immense immediate answers, and even claims that philosophers are wrong (page 57). Hobbes also claims that men has “restless desire of power after power” (page 58); he claims this explains how and why people act in a certain manner. Reflecting on our modern society, we see a continuous aim of people working to become more powerful among their peers. This is why we have promotions in jobs, positions in the work force, and even grades on report cards. Hobbes claims that power explains most actions throughout history, and without power, people …show more content…
On page 62, Hobbes relates faith to a blind man being told there is a fire; with a vast amount of people telling you about the fire, and what it does, you begin to understand the fire, without touching or seeing it. Hobbes also claims that “the seed of religion is only in man” (page 63) and that people have only created God to “have to know the causes of natural bodies” (page 64). Later, he goes on to explain that because of faith, we have laws. We can see a comparison in this to today’s laws and government. We, as a nation, claim a separation between state and government- but it’s hard to do so, while showing that most laws derived from faith. Some laws, like the law refusing homosexuals the right to get married, have been overturned because of its basis to Christian morality. Other laws, like murder, are bound to stay intact, because most of the population agrees that it is morally wrong. So where should laws cross the line? Some argue that laws should only be in place if they do harm to another

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Hobbes’ mind humans are naturally violent and need to control to avoid any outbursts which would destroy social order (63). People with this thought process saw that the body in power should have complete authority over their subjects with no restraint on their power and no one being able to remove them from their throne. This however is setting a kingdom up for failure as even though some people can be prone to violence, oppressing them with a monarch that controls them too harshly or that are disinterested in ruing a kingdom can cause an even more violent uprising which is displayed in the French revolution. Nonetheless, having a government body put in power is necessary as humans do require leadership and social order but that same government body must be held accountable if there are caught doing any wrongdoings that could severely hinder the progress of the community or create arduous situations to their…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout human history, the issue of power has been the source of countless wars and violence, and so has it sparked inspiration in many philosophers to develop potentially better systems of government. The Age of Enlightenment saw many philosophers sprout with new ideas on forms of government to replace or refine the archaic norm of absolute monarchy; one such controversial thinker was Thomas Hobbes. In his widely-recognized book, The Leviathan, he claimed that, because human beings are naturally selfish and evil, one must cede his or her rights to the absolute monarch so that peace can be established and maintained. However, if all human beings are cruel, then monarchs are not any different from the evil of those he rules. In William Golding’s 1954 novel The Lord of the Flies, Golding reflects Hobbes’ ideas about human nature as he depicts the governing of a cluster of stranded boys on an island, from the lack of cohesion of Ralph’s attempt to rationally lead them back to civilization, to Jack’s manipulation of the children into savagery. William Golding thus qualifies Thomas Hobbes’ position, supporting that humans are naturally selfish and evil but refuting his claim that an absolute ruler would make “wise” decisions through his illustration of Jack’s greed for power, hostile acts to Ralph and Piggy, and manipulation of his followers.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power is the ability to influence people to perform in a specific way. The ambition of having power, has made humans influence other peoples’ lives and nature. For example, writer David Hume presented and criticized the “is-ought problem—the notion that we can derive what ought to be from an example of what is” (Barash 283). People are not satisfied with what is natural, so they want to go furthermore and try to change it, using any sources they have within their reach. We are unstoppable, the more we have the more we want.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes talks about his view of Human Nature in his book The Leviathan. His central belief was built around the idea that the nature of humanity leads people to seek power. He believed that humans naturally desired the power to live well, and that human beings will never be satisfied with the power they currently possess unless they acquire more power. Hobbes defined power as” the ability to…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, government is needed so that society will not collapse into violence due to humanity’s selfish desires and self-interest. Hobbes believes that humanity’s natural state is motivated by self-interest and will do everything they can to succeed in their endeavors. People will do whatever it takes to fulfill what their idea of ‘good ’is. When everyone acts this way it quickly devolves into chaos, war, and violence.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Because power corrupts, society's demands for moral authority and character increase as the importance of the position increases” (BrainyQuote). James Adams’ quote states that power is the root of evil in society. As soon as we are born into this world, society already starting to corrupt our innocence. In The Lord of The Flies, William Golding, uses Jack and Ralph to display that man is born into the world innocent, but as time passes, is corrupted by evil and power within society.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To Locke’s claim that men cannot give away power they do not have, Hobbes would respond that the power of a sovereign “was not given, but left to him” because his power comes from nature, not from the people (XXVIII.2).…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fighting against unjust laws does not just not jeopardize order as Hobbes implies, but actually need to be done in a system of order. Whereby order is maintained, so that through this order laws would be…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes argues that a high number of men try to take affairs into their own hands, controlling businesses, but do it differently, and this entertains the possibility of civil war (Hobbes 1996, 113). Men try to exercise sovereignty over the public, and make the important decisions in the government. Men are knowledgeable and intelligent beings, with vast creative ideas and abilities. With these different intelligent levels, also lie the…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The things that drive men towards wanting peace are fear of death, desire to live peacefully, and the possibility of getting that standard of life. In the state of nature, there is no common power and Hobbes states that all individuals are fundamentally equal in that everyone is capable of killing or harming another individual. There is no peace and the risk of death is constant. Life without laws and before a civil society is defined by a constant state of war and general chaos. In the state of nature, every man has a right to everything. The existence or potential existence of this condition means that there is absolutely no guarantee that individuals can preserve themselves. When in a state of war, "there is no place for industry, because…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Power”, the literal meaning of this word is “control”. Unfortunately, we are living in a world where the lust for power has resulted in the destruction of humanity. From the lower class clerks to the industrialists of the highest class, everyone is involved in a race, a race to get to the top. And they are willing to use any means to get there. Leg pulling has become a culture now a days, no one can digest anyone else’s success. Everybody is blinded by this hunger for attaining power. Take any one; a student can do anything to get an A in his finals, even if it may involve sabotaging his fellow students’ work. A country can go to unthinkable extents to get to the top, even if has to take down another country and kill numerous of innocent people.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays