Preview

History is not important in Intercultural Relations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History is not important in Intercultural Relations
“History is not important in Intercultural Relations”. Discuss
Intercultural relation is concerns and issues about to understand, communicate, and accomplish goals with foreigner in foreign culture. One of the major issues in intercultural relation is culture. The foundation of culture was shaped by human history. Therefore, different culture of communication between county to country may understand with different meanings. This essay will discuss that history is or not important in intercultural relation by considering several aspects: firstly, discuss German nationalism affected the relation between the European in early 20th century, secondly, the post first world war issues in the Paris Peace Conference, Lastly, the comment from the India crime chief.
Firstly, the German’s history shown German became nationalism in late 19th to early 20th century and united by Otto von Bismarck1. In early 20th century, nationalism of the German had become extreme, people believed that their county was always right and aimed to strengthen their country by weakening others. After the Pan-Germanism and later became a movement to establish world domination. And this historic movement led to German extreme nationalists believed that German race was superior to other races and therefore, should dominate not only Europe but also the whole world. The history had shown German nationalism culture was built in late 19th century and the ambition shown German wanted to rule the world. As a result, Germany raised suspicion and tension relation with the European.
Secondly, the Franco-German relation was hostile after the Franco-Prussian war and the treaty of Frankfurt. France became revengeful. This revengeful was led to form extreme nationalism and revenge movement against Germany. Furthermore, Georges Clemenceau2 demanded harsh punishment in post-world war and the strong revengeful was directly placed in the Paris Peace Conference with the treaty of Versailles. As a result, The Paris



Bibliography: Bismarck and unification. (n.d.) Retrieved 10 November, 2013, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/higher/history/nationalism/unification/revision/2/ India crime chief causes outrage with ‘if you can’t prevent rape, you enjoy it’ comment. (2013, Nov 13) The euronews. Retrieved from http://www.euronews.com/2013/11/13/india-crime-chief-causes-outrage-with-if-you-cant-prevent-rape-you-enjoy-it-/ MacMillian.M. (2013). What caused the first world war? The Spectator. Retrieved from http://www.spectator.co.uk/books/books-feature/9047051/the-war-that-ended-peace-by-margaret-macmillan-review/ Scollon. R, Scollon.S.W, Jones.R.H. (2011). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Wiley-Blackwell.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To begin with, one would have to look at the various factors that led to souring in relations between countries, for example, “Weltpolitik”. Germany was a new country, and had industrialized pretty quickly. Its nationalism was growing which led its imperialistic attitude. Thus it had ditched “realpolitik” and cast its eyes on the rest of the world. Germany did not “want to place anyone in the shadow,” but still have “a place under the sun.” Britain and other leading powers did not want Germany to have an empire, because they were scared it would make Germany even more powerful. Germany accused them of double standards and led to it feeling resentful to the other countries.…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The transformation of germany socially economically and geographically depended on turning points. from 1789 when nationalism only idea, to anti french feeling encouraging nationalism to the aggressive welpolitik,…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ ESSAY

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First off, nationalism in Europe caused war outcomes. As nationalism is rising throughout Europe, many nations decide to get ready and to prove their nation is the top or the best. By proving they are the best and that they will set the example of a very influential one, the nation would have to go to war to conquer the weaker nation or to gain its independence from another nation. For example, document 2’s painting depicting a Berlin uprising (Marzrevolution), shows the uprising of one nation over the other. This painting depicts how nationalism was used by having the people come as one and conquer or defeat the other nation. Not only that, “We are, moreover, more exposed than any other people to the danger of hostile coalition because of our geographical position, and because, perhaps, of the feeble power of cohesion which, until now, the German people has exhibited when compared with others.” (Otto von Bismarck; “War and Armaments in Europe”) proves that if you are a nation like Germany, you must be very alert and careful. One stupid move or mistake and your nationalism and nation will fall and be crushed by another nation. Lastly, It is the sacred conviction which has given birth to the steadfast belief both of our rulers and of the ruled, that Russia is the source and center of an invincible might, which is but increased by the attacks of her foes.” (Prince Ukhtomskii, “Russia’s Imperial Destiny”) proves that because the nation is the most invincible might, it has set an influential example towards other small states and countries. By being the top might,…

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Germany before the Fuhrer. Germany’s defeat at the end of World War I left the nation socially, politically, and economically shattered. The reparation agreements inflicted upon Germany without its’ consent at the end of the war meant that the nation was in complete financial ruin. In the wake of Germany’s defeat, public decent climaxed on the 9th November 1918 during the revolution that took place on Berlin’s Postdamer Platz. This revolution transpired as a result of the public’s culminating discontent towards the imperial monarchy, and lasted up until August 1919, which saw the establishment of the Weimar Republic. In attempts to guide Germany out of economic depression, hostilities grew towards the Weimar due to their failure to fulfil communist revolutionary prophecy. They were also perceived by the Right Wing as those who betrayed Germany by accepting the terms in the Treaty of Versailles. After Germany’s defeat in WWI the nations sentiment was becoming increasingly nationalistic; the people were looking for a leader who would promise economic recovery as well as a restoration of German pride. Hitler and his national socialist party were, in many German opinions, the hard lined party who would deliver such promises.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Von Bismarck ran in office from 1862 to 1890. This impacted Germany by changing the power given to each country in Europe. According to the New York Times article “British Votes to Leave E.U., Cameron Plans to Step Down”, nationalism is represented by the decision the people of the nation of England. This article…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Prussia realized Germany’s vulnerability, seeing how its loose union and its central geographical spot in the continent made it vulnerable to attack from strong neighbors like France and Russia. So, Prussia set out to unify Germany to form one large, stronger state. However, this unification could not have been possible without Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian noble who had risen through the ranks to become a major political figure and the driving force behind German unification. The question is begged, however: how did Bismarck do it? How did he rise to power and unite these fragmented pieces into one union? Well, for one, Bismarck had connections. A noble by birth, Bismarck had high social standing, but no governmental or military background that would facilitate a career in politics. Nonetheless, he befriended two military generals by the names of Helmut von Moltke and Albrecht von Roon. Moltke and Roon, both cunning military minds and dedicated ideologues, rose up the Prussian power ladder. In 1859, Roon was appointed minister of war, allowing him a direct link to the king. A strong believer in Bismarck’s potential, Roon lobbied the king to appoint Bismarck to a high post. It was a success, and in September 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president. Now that Bismarck had reached high office, it was up to him to use his power wisely. This is where Bismarck’s political cunning comes into play. Soon after receiving his position, Bismarck began winning the king over. Within a short while, Bismarck…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This growth of nationalism would not stop once Germany was a country, imperialism was the only way that they could become superior. This led the Germans into catch-up imperialism in Africa, which led to hostility between Germany and France. In the Balkan states there was a feeling amongst some people similar to the nationalism felt by the people of the germanic states. Known as panslavism, states in the balkan peninsula had the…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the impact of World War One took its toll on Europe countries like Russia, Italy and Germany were in dire need of a change. Germany was most impacted by the war and was left in a state where everyday citizens were homeless, jobless, and starving. Looking for someone save Germany, Germans were in a desperate need for change and turned to group of radicals that were rising in power at a rapid rate known as the Nazis. Looking for someone to “save Germany” the Nazi’s unconventional but radical beliefs gave many Germans a strong sense of hope. “One of the reasons the Nazi ideology was so successful in eliciting support for the party and consensus behind its program was that its structure was built central concepts that, in the…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Nationalism

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    why, I guess its up to perspective. The sudden union of many cultural identities was…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This helped to convince the citizens that their home country was the best and could never be conquered. In London, nationalism was being spread through literature. Cheap novels, short stories, and essays were published talking of future wars and invasions that were inevitably coming from German, Russian, and French forces. Lastly, in Germany, nationalism was used to build up the new nation and gain support from the public. All of German culture was bolstered and revered.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following World War 1, Germany faced an economic depression. The need for patriotism, as evidenced in the following quote, would explain Adolf Hitler’s receptivity and acceptance by a country full of hurting people. “ There will be no other revolution in Germany for 1000 years.” (4, pg. 384) Also explainable by their loss in the first World War is their mad patriotism which seemed to dog the entire nation and create a need for such intense xenophobia, as evidence in the following; “In the eyes of many Germans, including the diplomats,…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism is the feeling of patriotism but in this case, which is a more extreme one, their nationalism lead them to imperialism in Africa. There were many countries at that time that were trying to be the best. Being the best comes with having the most money, the smartest people, the most land, the most power. Really they wanted things like money and resources because is lead to power and greatness. One man Freidrich Fabri said “When the German Reich centuries ago was at the peak of the states in Europe, it was the Number One trade and sea power. Should the New German Reich wish to prove and maintain its newly won position of power for a long time, it will have to take up the same culture-mission and delay no longer to acknowledge its colonial task anew.” The statement is very similar to a statement made by John Ruskin, a man from England. Many countries wanted to be the best and taking over parts of Africa was a clear show of…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Numerous factors have lead to the progressive creation of a unified Germany by 1871; such factors are fundamentally related to economic, political or military origins. To accurately understand the reasoning behind the unification, one must look at the history preceding it – The after-effects of the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire; The significance of the French revolutions and Napoleonic Wars on Germanic national identity; the degradation of Austria’s national power; the introduction of the Zollverein in 1834 and the Prussian economic superiority that followed in addition to the industrialisation of the German states all contribute towards economic and political factors relating to the formation of a unified Germany under Prussia’s direction. Military factors contributing towards the unification of Germany include the defeat and exile of Napoleon Bonaparte; Otto Von Bismarck’s foreign policy based strongly around ‘realpolitik’; the significance of the ‘New Model Army’ on Prussia’s military prominence in addition to the conclusive Franco-Prussian war.…

    • 3897 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays