Preview

Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
490 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
Hiroshima is a heart-wrenching, eye opening book. This book spent less time concentrating on the historical aspects of the atomic bomb, and instead focused on the devastation that the bomb invoked upon Hiroshima, and its citizens. Hiroshima really worked to explain the havoc that the atomic bomb caused to the people that lived in the city, and how the effects of the bomb lingered for years after the war was over. Hiroshima followed the lives of six individuals, explained all the destruction that they witnessed and depicted their reactions to the hardships they had to endure.

A majority of citizens in Japan did not give a lot of thought into whether or not the bomb was ethical. The citizens were, understandably, preoccupied attempting to discern the catastrophe that had transpired in their beloved city. Most of the citizens were “too busy or too weary or too badly hurt to care that they were the objects of the first great experiment in the use of atomic power” (49). The citizens directed their efforts on rebuilding the city, “statisticians began to say that at least a hundred thousand people had lost their lives in the bombing” and there were “sixty-two thousand out …show more content…
A few days after the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Tenno, their Emperor, did a radio broadcast to the city of Hiroshima. Tenno doing this was seen as a selfless act in the eyes of the citizens, but it’s possible it was just a precaution that sought to keep the citizens loyal to Japan. When the citizens, “came to know the war ended- that is, Japan was defeated, they, of course, were deeply disappointed, but followed after their Emperor’s commandment in calm spirit, making whole-hearted sacrifice for the everlasting peace of the world- and Japan started her new way” (65). The citizens were extremely loyal to their Emperor, and it was inevitable that they would solely blame the Americans for the chaos that fell upon
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Essay
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Essay

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bombs
    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bombs

    President Truman was justified in using atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. As commander-in Chief of US Armed forces, President Truman was responsible for the men and women in harms way. Americans and Japanese were dying, suffering life-altering injuries and experiencing torture and deprivation in prison camps each day the war raged. Additionally, it is important to look at the cultural elements of Japan, , the possible invasion of Japan, and the American morale during this time, when addressing the justification of Truman's decision.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima Persuasive Letter
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hiroshima Persuasive Letter

    I am writing this letter to you to discuss my concerns on why I feel you should not drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. First off let me start by saying that if you decide to proceed with the dropping of this atomic bomb you will be killing hundreds and thousands of innocent people. I am not sure if you understand the severity of dropping this bomb and the amount of people you will be killing and/or injuring severely. I would like for you to take the time to step back to look at this situation from all angles. What if Japan had decided to drop an Atomic Bomb on the United States. How will that make you feel knowing that your close family and friends can or will be killed because of a disagreement? I am aware…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    As barbaric as the atomic bomb was, the opposing argument would point out that “the face of war is the face of death...the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” (Document 3). It’s true that death is inevitable during war time, but over one hundred thousand Japanese deaths is excessive, especially when many were civilian deaths. Although the atomic bomb did bring an end to the war in the Pacific, “the Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender” (Document 2). The bombing was unnecessary, and an excessive use of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Truth On If The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was Necessary
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Truth On If The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was Necessary

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Wrong Or Wrong Essay
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Wrong Or Wrong Essay

    "It's too bad that there were so many casualties, but if you tell me how to fight a war without killing people, then I'm going to be the happiest man in the world," said Theodore "Dutch" Van Kirk, the last living crew member that dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. The U.S. dropped two bombs, on Hiroshima, and later Nagasaki three days later. The bombs were built under the project code-named “The Manhattan Project,” named after the place they were constructed, Manhattan, New York. And an estimated total of 225,000 people was killed or wounded on account of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Hiroshima and Nagasaki Death Toll). While dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was terrible, it was not wrong for the United States because an invasion of Japan…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dropping The Atomic Bombs Justified Essay
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dropping The Atomic Bombs Justified Essay

    In the summer of 1945, the United States ravaged the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with newly developed, top secret atomic bombs. In the many years following this event, arguments have transpired as to whether this action was ethical, and whether it was really necessary to end World War II quickly. However, due to the wartime situation and Japan’s extreme cruelty, the United States were predominantly justified in their decision to drop the atomic bombs. Dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was a strategic method to finish the Second World War, and to avenge the Japanese with minimal casualties.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bombing Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bombing Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

    “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds’?” These were the word that Mr. Robert Oppenheimer used after the Manhattan Project was successful. Mr. Oppenheimer was one the scientist who help create the nuclear bomb that was later, dropped on Hiroshima. The bomb name was “Little Boy” which help end World War II. So, I believe that it was necessary to drop the bomb on Hiroshima because the war was still going strong and Japan wasn’t showing no sign of surrender. The war was costing a lot of American lives, the end was nowhere near, and Japan citizen were loyal to their Emperor and the war. So, I would be explaining why I think bombing Hiroshima with was the right thing to do to end World War II.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified

    Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is The Atomic Bomb Justified

    They said that the bomb was necessary to end the war, but they didn’t even attempt to go for a more diplomatic approach. They ended up killing innocent peoples' lives just because they can. Apparently it was necessary for the ending of the war, killing over 100,000 innocent people. If the US was to be bombed because Japan wanted to “end war”, then there would've been an outrage and Japan would have had a target on their backs. Just like the people that were responsible for orchestrating 9/11 we’re not justified for actions of killing innocent people, because that’s insane and cruel.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay
    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay

    One of the most controversial issues of World War II is the debate on whether or not the United States should have used an atomic bomb against the Japanese. People who tend to oppose the use of the atomic bomb tend to ignore, or are ignorant, of the history of Japan during World War II. One factor to consider is the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in countries that Japan had conquered. Another aspect was the “never surrender” mentality of the Japanese military in the territories they controlled during World War II. The final point is the estimated number of casualties for both sides. Due to these factors, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan to save lives on both sides.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Did The Atomic Bomb Cause Mass Destruction
    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Did The Atomic Bomb Cause Mass Destruction

    During the August of 1945, America dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima. The ethical debate on this topic may never be resolved, but one cannot possibly deny the negative effects.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

    The use of the atomic bomb remains controversial to this day. There are academics and policy makers of the time that still disagree on the whether it was justifiable to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They debate if it truly was in the interest of ending the war sooner and with less loss of life. Several issues played together to help form the opinion that Truman acted for more nefarious purposes. Domestic as well as international politics is said to have played a role in the decision of Truman to go ahead with the use of the atomic bomb . Would the Japanese have been willing to surrender without the dropping of the bomb? Some experts believe that because Japanese representatives were talking to the Russians about being…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics