Preview

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq
I am completely opposed to the bombings on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is

understood that the bombs signify the end of war. However people tend to overlook the fact that these

bombs were an act of terrorism and left innocents like ourselves in the blunt of it. Imagine if it was us.

Would we be so happy then? It is obvious that the atomic bombs were completely unnecessary because

they were simply for revenge on Pearl Harbor, they were a crime against humanity and nature, and

Japan was already defeated

Thousands of innocent lives were lost during those bombings to prove a point that the countries

were now even. Though it is known that 2 wrongs do not make a right. When justifying the reasons for

the bombing,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Dbq Analysis

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They suffered many innocent lives that were surrounding the radius of the explosion and were wiped out right away.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History CBA

    • 613 Words
    • 1 Page

    bombs did not hit the ground before exploding, they were detonated in the air. As a result…

    • 613 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    japan air raid

    • 510 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All of the bombs dropped in Japan resulted in close to 900,000 innocent people dead. Japanese government did not prepare their cities or citizens for these bombing.There was very few shelters built to because of the shortages of concrete and steel. Citizens were trained to fight fires in response to incendiary and high explosive bombs but they didn’t have enough training. With little training the bombs were able to damage much of the cities.…

    • 510 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. On August 9, 1945, the second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. Thousands died instantaneously while many more died from radiation exposure from the bombs. The use of the atomic weapons was unnecessary due to the fact the Japan’s military was greatly weakened and ready to surrender, thousands of innocent lives were sacrificed simply for political power, and there could have been alternatives to cease the war.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The bomb caused great destruction to thousands of innocent lives. The bomb created a whole other problem, that could’ve been substituted with another weapon, that not as deadly. Bombs came with pros and cons, the bombs meant for people and those who have nothing to do with any incident. Overall the bombs were pure cruel.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude, in my opinion the first atomic bomb should have been used on Japan to end…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It also led to them doing something about it. Everyone tried to kill Osama bin Laden hoping it would lead to peace again. If Osama bin Laden was never born these attacks wouldn’t have happened the world would not have had to face this much death caused by one man. On August 7, 1998, bombs exploded in Nairobi, Kenya.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..." Admiral William D. Leahy (Alperovitz,The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, date of publication unknown) There have been many issues involved with the use of the atomic bomb because of the high cost of lives, and that it was considered to be immoral and unethical. However it has also been considered necessary for the war to have ended, avoiding further casualties on both sides.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people today could argue their side and reasons on why they think the United States was justified in bombing Japan. But was Osama in Laden justified in orchestrating 9/11? No one in their right mind would support the killing of innocent civilians on 9/11 on the basis of the argument that Osama Bin Laden and his cohort wanted to end the war between radical Islam and the U.S. So why is it acceptable for the U.S. to have incinerated tens of thousands of civilian men, women, children and babies to end the War, when there was a military alternative? The U.S. could have continued the war against the Japanese armed forces instead of targeting Japanese civilians. If the Japanese civilians who were killed are not deemed to have been innocent because they may have supported the Imperialist Japanese Government, then neither was those who died in the World Trade Center or any Americans, because they support the U.S. Government!…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The amount of peace for the US got for dropping the bomb was significant. It kept peace with its allies all around the world balanced. When dropping the atomic…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1945 Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb not only once, but twice to finish World War Two. The first bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima August, 6th killed upwards to around 80,000 people and the second bomb dropped on Nagasaki August, 14th killed 40,000 people. The controversy of the atomic bomb is because of the amount of innocent people that were killed in Japan. Nobody will ever know the outcome of the war if we never dropped the bomb, but we do know that the war was ended because of it. Over 100,000 people lost their lives because of these bombs, but how many lives would have been lost if we never dropped them? That is the other question that can never be answered, but based…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The politicians in power when this traumatic event occurred could have agreed to a different course of action instead of dropping an atomic bomb to Hiroshima. Therefore, instead of thinking about the long-term effects and coming up with a reasonable solution to end the war, the politicians in power chose the easy route. Bomb! Particularly,…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb dubbed “Little Boy” was dropped on Hiroshima and was followed by another, named “Fat Boy” at Nagasaki three days later in an attempt by the United States to end WWII. Germany had been defeated and the allied forces were sure to win the war. The main concern was how to defeat Japan. Japan surrendered unconditionally on August 14th, 1945. President Truman’s decision to use the bombs is often criticized given that the effects of an atomic bomb are so devastating and long lasting. Was the atomic bomb really necessary? There were four major alternatives to dropping the atomic bomb: using the atomic bomb in a non combat demonstration, altering the demand for unconditional surrender, invade Japan with Allied and Soviet assistance, and continuing conventional war techniques.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays