In Hemingway's "Hills Like White Elephants", he utilizes the audience in understanding the substance of his plot. He takes on a sense of truth by putting an intense amount of dialogue, thus giving a realistic type of writing. Through the usage of dialogue between the couple, it shows the depth of expectations. The audience must rely and fall back upon their own personal experience in order to interpret the conversation/plot. The correlation with nature plays into the language and the action of how the story flows. There is a definite split between the two different sides of the tracks. Basically, all that ties in with the hills represent life and that particular side of the tracks. It is a flash comparison of fertility versus barrenness by using language in description. Typical stereotype of the pensive, unsure female who has yet to step up and voice her opinions and speak her mind about her stance upon this pregnancy. Hemingway has truly taken on the modernist view. He completely takes out the third person narration and replaces the storytelling through dialogue. We are no longer aware of what is going on through the characters' minds and the emotions that overwhelm them. You no longer are sure of the characters' motives behind their actions and words. For the audience to an extent, we must be able to tell them apart through this alienation effect. There is a necessity to step back from he actual character in the play and be able to separate the actor from the character/protagonist in the plot. By segregating the two, the actor plays a much better role in the sense that it can create a different feel. The audience is forced to relate to the character in order to understand his purpose. This short story takes an objective point of view which creates a dramatic purpose with the lack of a narrating author. Since the author doesn't explore the characters' minds at all, this allows the reader to see the characters in their true setting. In Ernest Hemingway's "Hills...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document