High-Stakes Testing: A Comparative Analysis

Both articles identify and analyze two different effects of high stakes testing. The first article doesn’t directly attack high stakes testing but simply analyzes data and forms a conclusion. This would mean that it can be furthered explained to draw a conclusion about high stakes testing. The second article begins to show a negative side to the consequences of high stakes testing; therefore, it is more certain in its purpose. High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitive Metasynthesis focuses on deciding whether high stakes testing has been able to take control of school curriculums and therefore identifies what changes it has made. Wayne Au analyzes his data collection to draw the conclusion that there are “three different, interrelated