Preview

Hierarchical Team

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1228 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hierarchical Team
Running head: HIERARCHICAL TEAM

Customer Inserts his/her Name

Customer Inserts Grade Course
Customer Inserts Tutors Name
Date: 31st March, 2011 Hierarchical team
A hierarchical team is a type of team organization structure in which the team is divided into hierarchies and there are many middle management (Mohr 1982). There is an overall manager of the team who is place at the top of the hierarchy. This manager is responsible for leading or controlling the managers in each hierarchy to make sure that the team’s objectives are met as well as the overall objectives of the organization. The manager works with the middle managers to make sure that the team is ran smoothly and that the organizational goals are being achieved by the team. There is a manager in each hierarchy who is called a middle manager who is in charge of their own department. This helps the department to be independent and therefore is able to deal with their own problems in their department without bothering what the other departments are doing. The manager who is in charge of this department is leads the department towards achieving team goals (Heckscher and Donnellon 1994). The manager is responsible of the whole department at large and in making sure that the team’s objectives are being achieved as well as the overall objectives of the organization. The middle managers communicate their progress to the overall team manager who is able to evaluate performance and decide if the team is achieving the intended objectives as well as the overall objectives of the organization.
Because in hierarchical teams the team is divided into hierarchies (Robbins and Judge 2007), the team is able to run smoothly because each department has its own jobs which are allocated to it and the department are able to undertake their jobs independently. This helps in making sure that the department or rather the hierarchy undertakes their work perfectly as they are responsible for themselves and can not



References: Amaral, L.A.N. and Uzzi, B. (2007). Complex Systems—a New Paradigm for the Integrative Study of Management, Physical, and Technological Systems: Management Science Burns, T. and G. Stalker. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock. Grey, C Heckscher, C. and Donnellon, A. (1994). The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: Sage Publications Lim, M Mohr, L. B. (1982).Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Pugh, D Robbins, S.F and Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational Behaviour: Washington: Pearson Education Inc Thareja, P

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tesco’s has a hierarchical organisation structure. Hierarchical structure has several level’s arranged in a treelike construction with the person with most power at the top and the lowest at the bottom E.G. Managing director at the top all the way to the bottom which is the quality guard manager and financial accountants. Hierarchical structure is mainly used in big companies like Tesco. The disadvantages of the hierarchical structure are that if the financial accountants have a problem it would take its time to get the message to the right person which is the managing director. So making decisions will take long to make as it would take a long time to go up the hierarchical structure to put the idea in place. Mainly the first instructions in a hierarchical structure will have to be the managing director because the person has the most power and be able to control the company and it will make its way down to the bottom.…

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Middle managers lieutenants and captains have an important role also when implementing change in an agency. Middle managers can make significant contributions to the changing culture of the agency to embrace and sustain COPPS. By building on the strengths of their subordinates, capitalizing on their training and competence, and treating people as individuals they create talented teams.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ashford Bus201 Final Paper

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A manager is a person who plans, controls, manages and directs a team of individuals. The job of manager is imperative for any organization. A manager can be a person who directs a business or enterprise or he can be a manager of accounts of a firm, organization or institute who controls expenditures and resources. In sports the manager is responsible for training, making strategies and performance of its athletes. The role of a manager in the success of any organization is vital and pivotal. The manager of any company is the person in charge of a team. He makes plans, directs his team, motivates0 them to achieve their goals. In a company, every department can have a manager, then all the managers usually have a manager. Here the role of each manager is almost the same, to manage the team. But the duties may vary according to the assignments. In short, one can say that the position of manager is the backbone of any company or organization. A successful Manager can uplift the status of the company, thus making it successful.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A manager in “top” management is primarily responsible for the organization. These individuals are responsible for setting goals, utilizing and developing strategies, while making changes to the structure and design of the organization. Middle management concern themselves with the major departments and must correlate the separate departments to fit the rest of the organization. The top and middle managers must work together to achieve the desired goal of the company to obtain the abstract idea of organizational theory or one unit. An example would be the common hierarchy of management for an organization. Having the hierarchy of management top, middle and lower level management in place can have significant advantages to the organization. It provides a structure that can filter through the entire organization. Let’s look from another perspective. If management didn’t study organizational theory and how it is relevant to organizations the company, that the managers are employed with, would suffer and would not be efficient or effective. This would lead them to miss their objectives as well as their goals. I have personally experienced organizations that did not concern themselves with the overall organization structure or theory of that company. The manager departments did not work well together and they kept most of their operations separate from the top-level managers. This caused issues for employees, who didn’t fully understand their objectives or goals, but also for customers of the company. Customers became irate from the mediocre services being provided which created a loss of revenue as well as clients. I believe it is imperative for companies to fully understand organizational theory but to also create a training program for the company so managers from all levels and employees are all working in the same direction to achieve the goals of the…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The shape of a hierarchical organisational structure is the pyramid. A hierarchical organisation is a group of objects structured to be subordinate to a central idea or person. The person in charge sits at the top of the pyramid (paid most). Each job description (manager, deputy manager etc.) sits below the top in descending order of power (paid less as you go down the pyramid). The flat bottom of the pyramid is filled with the bulk of the population of the organisation (worked hard paid the least). Organisational charts (diagrams) can be drawn to reflect the structure.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Irhr1001 Essay 2

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    An organisational structure accurately divides, selects groups and coordinates job tasks. Structure contributes to explain and predict organisational behaviour and organisational design. Managers often change organisational structures due to performance and efficiency being low (Robbins et al 2004), they should also ensure consistency in the structure, scale of operations, tasks at hand, need of stakeholders and strategic decision of the organisation, this distinguishes successful organisation from less successful organisations (Wood et al 2006). When changing the structure of the organisation managers should be aware of the six elements of structure: work specialisation is how tasks are subdivided into separate jobs; for example Ford workers had an assigned specific repetitive job such as installing the right front door of the car. This helped Ford to produce a car every ten seconds. Departmentalisation, groups jobs together in an organisation; such as marketing, human resources and accounting for instance Football organisations, Sydney Swans. Chain of command specifies who reports to whom (supervisor or store manager) and how (electronically or by speech). Span of control determines the amount of staff a manager can direct however it also identifies the amount of levels and managers the organisation will need. Centralisation and decentralisation aid in the decision…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Managers oversee the day to day operations and are part of the administration. However middle managers often become glorified paper pushers, preparing work schedules, overseeing recovered or confiscated property. Middle managers act as the barrier between administrators and operational personnel.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In larger organizations, management is often broken down into three levels that is upper management, middle management and lower management. Upper management includes top executives who are highest on the management hierarchy. Middle management includes department managers and division managers, who are the communication link between upper and lower management. Lower management includes first-line managers and supervisors, who are on the bottom of the management hierarchy. In smaller organizations, there is often only one level of management between the non-managerial employees and the organization 's leaders. Smaller organizations also generally have fewer managers than larger organizations. Non-managerial employees are placed into categories according to their job functions. In an office environment, non-managerial job titles may range from administrative assistant to payroll specialist to computer technician.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Organisational Structures

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hierarchical- hierarchical organization is an organizational structure where every entity in the organization, except one, is subordinate to a single other entity. This arrangement is a form of a hierarchy. In an organization, the hierarchy usually consists of a singular/group of power at the top with subsequent levels of power beneath them.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I do not believe either hierarchy or division of labor could be considered problems. Both align protocols and chains of commands in which the people best suited. Having a clear line of hierarchy in which worker can go to manager, who would in turn go to manager until it reached the president allows people higher up on the hierarchy to not have to spend time with tasks that could be handled by positions lower than them, allowing them to use their time more efficiently to carry out their own tasks. Likewise, division of labor allows for tasks to be matched to the best suited person to complete them. Not only can this save time since the person will already be familiar with the concept they are working with, it will allow the company as a whole to get to the next step and run more efficiently.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Groups and Teams

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Groups. Teams. High-performance teams. What is a group? "A group is a collection of people who interact with one another regularly to attain common goals" (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005). Over the years, groups have helped organizations achieve important tasks. They have also been resourceful of helping the members of organization to improve task performance and experience more satisfaction with their work. Groups are good for people, can improve creativity, can make better decisions, can increase commitments to action, help control organization members, and help offset a large organization size (Schermerhorn, Hunt & Osborn, 2005). Therefore, with all this positivity from a group, a group can form into a high-performance team through several stages and the actions of an effective manager.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is the case study on “Managing like a man at SilkQueen?” by Kate Hutchings of Queensland University of Technology. Here we are given a character named Sally Dawson who works for SilkQueen, which is an Australian company. She is a well skilled manager who has a huge experience for working successfully in Asia.…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jail Industry in Nepal

    • 8659 Words
    • 35 Pages

    The structure of the organization is top to bottom and is supported by vertical chain of command. It has…

    • 8659 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These departments have managers and subordinates who all possess the relevant and significant expertise needed for every specific type of department. As every department has a head or a manager and their supporting subordinates, jobs are broken down into simple, routine and well-defined tasks that are able to be achieved most effectively and efficiently.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burns and Stalker

    • 2742 Words
    • 11 Pages

    *Excerpted with permission of the publisher from The Management of Innovation, by T. Burns and G. M. Stalker, 1961, London: Tavistock. 103…

    • 2742 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays