Preview

Hickman Supreme Court Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
74 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hickman Supreme Court Case Study
The Supreme Court established the work-product doctrine in
1947 in Hickman v. Taylor.
6 In Hickman, the Court held that an attorney’s notes taken during interviews with witnesses in anticipation of litigation are not discoverable.7 To prepare for litigation, the Court said, our system must enable an attorney to “sift what he considers to be the relevant from the irrelevant facts, prepare his legal theories and plan his strategy without undue and needless
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Darlene Jespersen V. Harrah's Operating Company Summary
    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Darlene Jespersen V. Harrah's Operating Company Summary

    Facts: Darlene Jespersen was a bartender at Harrah’s Casino in Reno in the sports bar. She was frequently praised by her supervisors and customers for being an outstanding employee. When Jespersen first started her job at Harrah’s the female bartenders were not required to wear makeup but were encouraged to. Jespersen tried to wear makeup to work a few times but decided that she did not like it due to the fact it made her feel sick, degraded, exposed and violated. She also believed that it interfered with her ability to deal with unruly customers because it “took away [her] credibility…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Williams Vs. 03-30576 Case Study
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Williams Vs. 03-30576 Case Study

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hussey V. Peter Belmont: The Supreme Court Case
    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hussey V. Peter Belmont: The Supreme Court Case

    On November 5, 1983, defendants Elijah Anton Askov, Ralph Hussey, Samuel Gugliotta, and Edward Melo were charged with attempting to commit extortion against Peter Belmont. The following men Askov, Hussey, and Melo had existing charges on possession of weapons, pointing a firearm, and assault with a weapon. The defendants had been in business with Belmont for supplying exotic dancers to licensed premises. Belmont was offered to pay 50% commission to run a business with Melo and Gugliotta in the Toronto area. However, Belmont refused and contacted the police to file reports. On November 12th, Belmont and his bodyguard were approached by the defendants in a tavern which was under surveillance. Melo and Askov were arrested on scene. Hussey ran away but later turned himself in and was charged on November 14th. Gugliotta was arrested on November 30th. The defendants Melo, Hussey, Askov were denied bail and were placed in custody for 6 months. On May 7th, the three men were ordered to…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kentucky V King 563 US 452 Case Study
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kentucky V King 563 US 452 Case Study

    Facts: Police officers were in pursuit of a suspected drug dealer, and were led to an apartment complex. The officers ended up outside of a certain apartment, were the smell of marijuana emanated. The police knocked loudly, and from inside the apartment they heard movement, and the police believed that the sounds were an indication that evidence was being destroyed. The police announced their intent to enter the apartment, kicked the door down to find drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain sight, and arrested King and others. They continued to search the apartment and came across other evidence. King argued that due to the officers not having a warrant…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study: The Tarasoff Case
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Study: The Tarasoff Case

    The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella, n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar, a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at the facility and the determination, customary at that time, was made to have Poddar involuntarily committed. Dr. Moore notified the campus police and requested that Poddar be picked up, warning that Poddar can appear quite rational at times. Campus…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Branzburg V. Hayes
    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page

    Supreme Court Case: Branzburg V. Hayes

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Analysis: The Tennessee Vs. Lane Case
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Case Analysis: The Tennessee Vs. Lane Case

    Before 2004, courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have, a handicapped entrance. At this time, it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building, you had to ask someone to carry you in, or even worse, you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years, however, no one addressed it.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study: Holt V. Ray Hobbs
    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Study: Holt V. Ray Hobbs

    complaint made by Gregory and in my opinion, though the rules and regulations of the…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mckleskey V. Kemp Law Brief
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mckleskey V. Kemp Law Brief

    Mr. McCleskey was a Black man, that was convicted of two counts armed robbery and one count of murder in the Supreme Court of Fulton County, Georgia. His convictions were due to the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer while the robbery was occurring. There was evidence presented at trial that proved one of the bullets to be from a .38 caliber Rossi revolver, which fit the description of the gun McCleskey was carrying, and two witnesses who had heard McCleskey had admitted to the shooting.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mccullen V. Coakley Case Analysis
    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccullen V. Coakley Case Analysis

    The ARA does not violate the constitution because it is content and viewpoint neutral. It is content and viewpoint neutral because it does not restrict speech. The ARA was passed to stop unwelcome communications that stop others from practicing their own rights. The ARA never mentioned that a person could not voice their opinions, only that they can not impose their ideas or make another person go along with their ideas.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia Supreme Court Case Study
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Virginia Supreme Court Case Study

    The United States v. Virginia court case was debated on Jan 17, 1996 at Virginia Military Institute. The advocates involved were Paul Bender, who argued the case for the United States and Theodore B. Olson, who argued the case on behalf of Virginia. The U.S was the petitioner, while Virginia was the accused. According to "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court Case and Opinions.” the case was about Virginia Military Institute violating the fourteenth Amendments of Equal Protection by maintaining a public founded Virginia Military Institute as an all-male institution. According to "United States v. Virginia 518 U.S. 515 (1996)." Justia Law, the intention of the VMI was to create “citizen soldiers”, men who are prepared for leadership in civilian life and in military service. The VMI was trying to train male leaders of the future excluding the females.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Adverse Inference Instruction
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Adverse Inference Instruction

    5. This court determined there were two avenues available to prove the relevance of allegedly spoliated information. What are they? The two avenues that prove the relevance of the allegedly spoliated information in this case is the state of mind and the plaintiff must submit evidence supporting the missing information and/or documents.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    3 Landmark Supreme Court Cases- Research Essay
    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3 Landmark Supreme Court Cases- Research Essay

    Abraham Lincoln once said, “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties” (Shmoop.com). On September 17th, 1787 the signing of Constitution of the United States of America took place. The members of the Constitutional Convention met to create a strong, centralized government after the dissatisfaction of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution created a government made by the people, for the people, which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home, where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Court Case
    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    12 Angry Men Court Case

    A court reporter should always be ready to read her notes back to the judge.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics