Preview

Henry Iv: Hotspur vs. Harry

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1129 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry Iv: Hotspur vs. Harry
Henry IV: Hotspur vs. Harry

At the beginning of the play it seems that the chief rebel, Hotspur, is in dispute with the King but as the play progresses we find that the main contest is between Hotspur and Hal, the King's son. At first thought, Hotspur seems to be the easy winner, for all Hal does is spend his time with his friends gallivanting around, stealing and drinking.

Hotspur, on the other hand, has returned from a battle in which he defeated the
Scots led by Glendower. He has taken many prisoners including the Earl of
Douglas, a Scottish warlord. Hotspur is a very valiant warrior who has won a great reputation for himself on the battlefield. He is young and impetuous as his name suggests.

Henry IV has more admiration for Hotspur than his own son Hal, and is envious of
Northumberland for having such a son:

'a son who is the theme of honours tongue'. ' in envy that my Lord Northumberland should be father to so blest a son'.

The King feels that Hotspur reminds him of himself, when he challenged Richard for the throne. Hotspur is brave and valiant and has a good reputation with the people, whereas Hal compared with Richard does not care for the welfare of the country and spends his time entertaining himself with poor company.

Hotspur has nothing but disrespect for Hal. During the play he calls him:

'the madcap Prince of Wales'.

He thinks of Hal as an unworthy opponent. From Hotspur's point of view the only real opponent is King Henry, and yet it is Hal, 'the madcap of Wales', who vanquishes him in the end, much to his surprise and dismay. We are neither surprised nor dismayed by Hal's triumph because we know Hal better than Hotspur does, and we know what is going to happen.

In the first few scenes of the play we feel that Hal is exactly as Hotspur describes him, a madcap Prince, but as the play progresses we see that Hal intends to shine when he becomes King. He says that when the time comes he will
' throw off' his loose behaviour

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another line of reasoning that a lot of people believe Harold Godwinson the battle was the trick the Normans very cleverly played on the English. This crafty trick was about half way through the battle, the Normans realised that when they retreated, the English would follow them. So they made the ‘fake retreat.’ This is where when the English would chase the Normans down the hill, and then circle around slaughtering them in the process. Harold did not fall for this…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 14th October 1066 was to be a date that changed the course of British history. On that Saturday morning the Battle of Hastings was launched with an intensive bombardment of arrows fired from Norman archers towards the ranks of Harold’s army. William the Duke of Normandy and leader of the Norman troops advanced his army closer to the English line which was led by King Harold Godwinson. The previous English king Edward the Confessor had died without an heir. As a result a bad tempered and violent quarrel broke out to decide who would become the new King of England. Soon this quarrel became more sinister and led to a now famous battle between William and Harold.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14th October 1066 - between Harold Godwinson of England and William of Normandy. The conflict started because when King Edward died, he left no heir to inherit the crown, which left three men claiming to be the next King of England. These three contenders to the throne were Harold Godwinson who was the only Englishman and related to the old king by marriage, Harald Hadrada and William the Conqueror who was the only contender that was related to King Edward by blood.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dreamsong 29 Analysis

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “There sat down, once, a thing on Henry’s heart só heavy, if he had a hundred years & more… Henry could not make good”.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Prince Hal is the politician, while Hotspur is the man of action." To what extent do you agree with this interpretation of the play?…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the book, Henry only thought about one thing, himself. Henry makes choices without realizing how they can affect other people. When Henry leaves the battlefield in the beginning of the book, he doesn’t even think about how it affects others. He doesn’t realize that he could get punished for being a coward and leaving the…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hotspur's Views On Honor

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this comparison, Hotspur is the too hot porridge, Falstaff is the too cold porridge, and lastly Hal is just right. Hal is the perfect in between of Hotspur and Falstaff. Hal understands honor to be noble behavior, not noble actions. He shows us at the beginning of the play that he’s a ruffian, but lets us in on his plan to regain the honor later. These actions of hanging out with criminals and hoodlums didn’t earn him favor with his father or with England for that matter. His plan to earn the honor later was to lower the views of him now, so that when it is time to be the hero everyone will love him even more instead of just expecting it from the get-go. His longing for honor is in moderation and he achieved honor in a suitable way. When Hal fought Hotspur it wasn’t so that he could earn honor but so he could save the thrown and his father, it was essential. Hal’s plan was effective, removing himself from his previous lifestyle just in time to be the hero his father needed him to…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A spirited exchange of vulgar jokes between the Capulet servants begins Act, Scene 1 after the prologue and immediately links sex with conflict. In their bawdy quarrel, the servants' references to ‘tool’ and ‘naked weapon,’ together with repeated images of striking and thrusting, illustrate how images of love and sex are intertwined with violence and death — and will continue to be throughout the play. The sudden switch from the comedic interplay between the servants to a potentially life-threatening situation demonstrates the rapidly changing pace that drives the action of the rest of the play. For instance, Benvolio, whose name means ‘goodwill,’ tries to act as a peacemaker by dividing the servants, but the quick-tempered Tybalt forces him to draw his sword, and the atmosphere changes from harmony to hatred within a few lines.…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s King Henry IV, Part, the playwright aims to present differing views of the time on the themes and notions of being deceptive and honourable, through situation as well as character. Consequently the playwright leads to the central question what it means to be a man. William Shakespeare’s interpretation is reflected in the perfect transformation of Prince Hal. Shakespeare’s main characters Hotspur, Falstaff and Prince Hal display different understandings of honour and deception in order to support Shakespeare’s establishment of the nobility of Hal as he rises to take his place as Prince of Wales, future King. In addition to this, the concept of honour is seen to be derived from each individual’s characteristic interpretation. The proud and arrogant Hotspur is besotted with the idea of personal honour to a degree that it becomes a fault in his character, something Prince Hal needs to avoid. Falstaff represents honour among thieves”, he has an inverse comprehension of what honour means, a cowardly perception centred very much on his safety and comfort and as such represents the world of moral decay which the Prince must eschew. The idea of deception is something that Shakespeare places great emphasis on. He acknowledges that deception is part of a make-up of the medieval man, such as Hal, but is something that must be carefully managed, as witnessed with the demise of both the scheming Lord Worcester and the brutally honest Harry Percival.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Iv Essay

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Henry IV Part II William Shakespeare uses diction, syntax, and imagery to convey King Henry’s state of mind.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Romeo and Juliet Essay

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After the prologue, there are several types of conflict throughout the play, such as the conflict between the Capulets and Montegues and between Paris and Romeo.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Falstaff has no use of the common code of honour, he will go to great lengths to look honourable in the eyes of others. Hotspur is a character who is committed to honour, whereas Falstaff has an apparent lack of honour.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays