Helen Palsgraf, Respondent, V. the Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant

Topics: Appeal, Appellate court, Tort Pages: 2 (569 words) Published: February 8, 2012
Helen Palsgraf, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant


A passenger carrying a package, while hurrying to catch and board a moving Long Island Rail Road train, appeared to two of the railroad's (Defendant's) employees to be falling. The employees were guards, one of whom was located on the car, the other of whom was located on the platform. The guard on the car attempted to pull the passenger into the car and the guard on the platform attempted to push him into the car from behind. The guards' efforts to aid the passenger caused the package the passenger was holding to fall on the rails. Unbeknownst to the guards, the package, which was approximately 15 inches (38 cm) long and wrapped in newspaper, contained fireworks, and the package exploded when it hit the rails. The shock reportedly knocked down scales at the other end of the platform (although later accounts suggest that a panicking bystander may have upset the scale), which injured Mrs. Helen Palsgraf (Plaintiff). Palsgraf sued the railroad, claiming her injury resulted from negligent acts of the employee. The trial court and the intermediate appeals court found for Palsgraf (Plaintiff) by verdict from a jury, and Long Island Rail Road appealed the judgment.

The Court of Appeals (the highest court in New York) reversed and dismissed Palsgraf's complaint, deciding that the relationship of the guard's action to Palsgraf's injury was too indirect to make him liable.

Cardozo, writing for three other judges, wrote that there was no way that the guard could have known that the package wrapped in newspaper was dangerous, and that pushing the passenger would thereby cause an explosion. The court wrote that "there was nothing in the situation to suggest to the most cautious mind that the parcel wrapped in newspaper would spread wreckage through the station. If the guard had thrown it down knowingly and willfully, he would not have threatened the plaintiff's safety, so far as...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Helen Palsgraf, Respondent, V. the Long Island Railroad Company Case Brief Essay
  • Helen Palsgraf, Respondent, V. the Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant Essay
  • Essay about Palsgraf V. the Long Island Railroad
  • Helen Palsgraf, Respondent, v Essay
  • Bus 301 Case Study of Palsgraf v Essay
  • Polish Immigration on Long Island Essay
  • Long Island Man Essay
  • Legal Analysis Grimshaw V Ford Motor Company Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free