Marlow’s reaction symbolizes that the Intended was knowledgeable on Marlow’s homosexual emotions for Kurtz and that Marlow did not want these emotions revealed. These examples signal that Marlow embodies the idea of a strange relationship for a man, thus representing the difference from the normative behavior pushed onto men. Likewise, Bennett and Royle discuss that queerness was defined by homosexuality for men in the late 19th century, just prior to the publication of Heart of Darkness (Bennett and Royle 261). Heart of Darkness demonstrates an accurate discourse of homosexuality within men, as homosexuality was seen as outlawed, both legally and socially, and could not be practiced without consequences (Bristow 14). With this understanding, Marlow himself can be represented as queer in terms of homosexuality due to the shift in definition of queer to exclusively ostracize men for having “strange” emotions or relationships that were against the heteronormative
Marlow’s reaction symbolizes that the Intended was knowledgeable on Marlow’s homosexual emotions for Kurtz and that Marlow did not want these emotions revealed. These examples signal that Marlow embodies the idea of a strange relationship for a man, thus representing the difference from the normative behavior pushed onto men. Likewise, Bennett and Royle discuss that queerness was defined by homosexuality for men in the late 19th century, just prior to the publication of Heart of Darkness (Bennett and Royle 261). Heart of Darkness demonstrates an accurate discourse of homosexuality within men, as homosexuality was seen as outlawed, both legally and socially, and could not be practiced without consequences (Bristow 14). With this understanding, Marlow himself can be represented as queer in terms of homosexuality due to the shift in definition of queer to exclusively ostracize men for having “strange” emotions or relationships that were against the heteronormative