2. Of Headless Mice…and Men by Charles Krauthammer
3. But you don’t have to be a genius to see the true utility of manufacturing headless creatures: for their organs-fully formed, perfectly useful, ripe for plundering.
4. Researches found the gene that tells the embryo to produce the head. They delete it. They are thinking of doing this with humans as a future source of organs. They want to convince a skeptical public that it is perfectly ok. The headless clone solves the facsimile problem. It is a gateway to the ultimate vanity: immortality. The deliberate creation of headless humans must be made a crime, indeed a capital crime.
5. Cloning is the technology of narcissism, and nothing satisfies narcissism like immortality.
6. Headless human clones. Just the thought of it seems immoral. To actually think that scientist would want to have a human being somewhat “alive” kept in some crazy cold room hooked up to machines to keep them breathing, sounds wacky to me. Yet they have already done it to mice and tadpoles, but of course those are just small little animals. The thing that doesn’t make any sense would be to have them just for organ supply. This essay seems too sci-fi for me. To try and harvest organs just so that people could be immortal is very far fetched. To try to switch old organs to new ones really wouldn’t keep you immortal. Because the skin ages, bones get weak and you would have to basically cut your head off and place it on the other body for this to even work. Good luck with that.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A second set of ethical problems involves clearly separating thera- peutic from reproductive cloning. Because the techniques involved with therapeutic cloning are the same techniques that would be involved in reproductive cloning, opponents of the latter might argue that no thera- peutic cloning should be permitted because it will inevitably lead to re- productive cloning. The fear is that once cloned human embryos are created in the laboratory, there will be no way to stop scientists or phy- sicians from acceding to a person's request to have the cloned embryos…
- 102 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…
- 1944 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
“Even if the technique is used only in pursuit of biological knowledge and medical treatments, those will come at the very high ethical price of manufacturing human life for the purpose of harvesting it like a corn crop-that is, for the purpose of destroying it”(Smith 6). As a result this would lead to people rebelling against destroying them and to keep them alive until they die a normal life.“Cloning those animals could produce a whole herd of disease-free animals, saving farmers millions of dollars in lost meat”(Sohn 13). This is important because farmers can have As a result of this farmers will be able to have bigger farms and better equipment due to getting more money. Fewer cows would be needed to make milk if scientist could clone cows with the ability to produce 45,000 pounds of milk(Sohn 12). This is important because if they were able to produce a lot of milk from these cows then they can buy better equipment, land, and more companies to sell their products at. As a result of this the comutnities will be able to get more and better dairy products, veggies, and…
- 546 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Technology has a huge importance in our societies and as it dominates our daily lives, it has taken control over how we interact with others and how we learn. This need for technology can take us away from seeing the value of human life. Clones are thought not to have souls, to be mechanical and not capable of forming relationships or of developing strong emotions as humans would. Such a claim is made in order to justify the decision to use them for their organs, which may be unethical but in this novel is normalized. Humans in general in this novel further emphasize the point that they are cruel to those they consider “subhuman”. Never Let Me Go reveals that clones are dehumanized in order…
- 1114 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Clones could be seen as less than animals compared with non-clones” (Quinonez, blog.udemy.com). When I was reading I read that cloning is good for one good reason, to harvest the animal's organs. This idea is so inhumane, according (toblog.udemy.com) “While the cloning of body organs can be a great asset to extending human life, it could also cause a lot of malpractice. This could lead to a rise in malpractices within society.” First, scientist create these disgusting creatures and steal their organs for the purpose of human's life, that is just…
- 327 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…
- 686 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…
- 3138 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Currently, contemporary scientists have developed cloning by taking the genetic blueprint for a living being (their DNA) and creating another person using the exact same blueprint for reproductive and therapeutic reasons. (Esposito) Just as Dr. Frankenstein created his monster out of selfishness, some people desire to generate clones for their own self-interest. Consequently, reproductive cloning could allow infertile couples a chance to have children in their own image, and provide grieving parents a chance to DNA duplicate their child. While that sounds compassionate, producing a clone would also allow parents to use the child to live the life they always wanted, use the “copy” to examine their own psyche, or even to aid in the quest for immortality. (Smith Benefits) In therapeutic cloning, clones would be exploited for harvesting organs, healthy cells, and even sources for plastic surgery. (Smith Benefits) Compelling Truth contends that ” there are many other reasons for cloning, but they all suffer from abundant self-absorption.” (CompellingTruth Christian Cloning) It is difficult to express how vast of an ego cloning could satisfy. An important question is whether the use of technology should be manipulated for narcissistic ends. The underlying feeling in Frankenstein is that Victor wanted to prove he could use his scientific knowledge beyond the limits.…
- 1192 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
1. I think that it is morally wrong for a child to be created for "parts". Donor children are often referred to as "savior siblings", "spare part sisters", or "bred to order brothers". These names create the assumptin that the children are created merely for instrumental reasons, or to serve as a donor for the sick sibling, and not for their own sake. Same goes for clones, as soon as a clone (or any other human being) has achieved personhood, it deserves the same respect as any other being with those dispositional capacity. The ethical principle of equality demands no less.…
- 398 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Thousands of people each year die because of organ shortages. Cloning human organs can eliminate this epidemic. If organs can be specially made for each individual who needs one, organ transplant waiting lists can be eliminated. “...An average of 18 people die each day waiting for transplants that can 't take place because of the shortage of donated organs”(“The Need Is Real: Data”). These deaths can be prevented by cloning. However, many people believe that cloning is very unethical and goes against religion. This hinders the formation of cloning and holds back scientists from imperative research. The lack of support given by the people for cloning research impedes government and local funding and aid. The delay in funding and aid creates a rift in research. Many people support biomedical technology and cloning, but only to a certain extent. Most religious people are concerned about cloning because they believe that only God has the right to give and take life in any form. In reality, fear and the lack of knowledge inhibit many religious and ethical people from supporting the idea of cloning. “If we hope to direct the course of this powerful technology, we should strive to learn as much as we can about these molecular tools and then let scientists and corporations know our wishes. Only then can we truly expect to avoid the risks and enjoy the…
- 1307 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff that will determine what if any, impact that cloning will have upon our ever-changing society. Each side has compiled substantial evidence against the other as to why cloning should or should not be legalized and practiced. It is my strong belief that the curative effects that could be reaped by practicing cloning far outweigh the arguments of anti-cloning advocates; the practice of human cloning should be legalized and practiced. Countless individuals could benefit from its various applications and the future of medicine would be drastically enhanced.…
- 1534 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…
- 1194 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…
- 604 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays