Journal of International Money and Finance 30 (2011) 678–691
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of International Money and Finance
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jimf
The impact of the ﬁnancial system’s structure on ﬁrms’ ﬁnancial constraints Christopher F. Baum a, b, *, Dorothea Schäfer b, c, Oleksandr Talavera d a
Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA DIW Berlin, Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden d School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK b c
a b s t r a c t
JEL classiﬁcation: G32 G30 Keywords: Financial constraints Financial structure Financial development Cash ﬂow sensitivity of cash
We estimate ﬁrms’ cash ﬂow sensitivity of cash to empirically test how the ﬁnancial system’s structure and level of development inﬂuence their ﬁnancial constraints. For this purpose we merge Almeida et al.’s work, a path-breaking design for evaluating a ﬁrm’s ﬁnancial constraints, with that of Levine, who paved the way for comparative analysis of ﬁnancial systems around the world. We conjecture that a country’s ﬁnancial system, both in terms of its structure and its level of development, should inﬂuence the cash ﬂow sensitivity of cash of constrained ﬁrms but leave unconstrained ﬁrms unaffected. We test our hypothesis with a large international sample of 30,000 ﬁrm-years from 1989 to 2006. Our ﬁndings reveal that both the structure of the ﬁnancial system and its level of development matter. Bank-based ﬁnancial systems provide constrained ﬁrms with easier access to external ﬁnancing. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction For many years, ﬁnancial theory has stressed the role of ﬁnancial constraints on ﬁrms’ behavior, but it has rarely considered how obstacles to external ﬁnancing may vary across different ﬁnancial systems. Although stock markets can play a very important role in meeting ﬁrms’ ﬁnancing needs, a strong and solid banking system may be a workable alternative to meet ﬁrms’ external funding requirements. Different corporate governance systems, different regimes of investor protection, and different
* Corresponding author. Department of Economics, Boston College, Carney Hall 230, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA. Tel.: þ1 617 552 3673; fax: þ1 617 552 2308. E-mail addresses: firstname.lastname@example.org (C.F. Baum), email@example.com (D. Schäfer), firstname.lastname@example.org (O. Talavera). 0261-5606/$ – see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jimonﬁn.2011.02.004
C.F. Baum et al. / Journal of International Money and Finance 30 (2011) 678–691
corporate ﬁnancing structures may all signiﬁcantly inﬂuence agency conﬂicts, recognized as obstacles to external ﬁnancing. Thus, the structure and the level of development of the ﬁnancial system of a speciﬁc country may be key determinants of the ﬁnancial constraints that its ﬁrms face. Anecdotal evidence documents signiﬁcant differences in the structure of the ﬁnancial macroeconomic environment. For instance, in 2006 the ratio of private credit by deposit money banks to GDP in Germany, 1.23, is 2.5 times higher than the same indicator in the USA, 0.48. Exactly the opposite is observed if we consider the stock market capitalization to GDP ratio for the same year: these indicators for USA and Germany equal 1.35 and 0.43, respectively. A natural question arises: in which countries are ﬁrms less likely to face obstacles in their access to external ﬁnancing? To address this issue, we begin by observing the liquidity policy of ﬁrms and relating it to the degree of ﬁnancial frictions they face. The traditional approach to measure ﬁnancial constraints in terms of ﬁrms’ investment–cash ﬂow sensitivity is quite controversial (e.g. Fazzari et al., 1988; Kaplan and Zingales, 1997). Therefore we follow the recently developed approach of Almeida et al. (2004), who consider a...
References: Acharya, V.V., Almeida, H., Campello, M., October 2007. Is cash negative debt? A hedging perspective on corporate ﬁnancial policies. Journal of Financial Intermediation 16 (4), 515–554. Allen, F., Gale, D., 2000. Comparing Financial Systems. MIT Press. Almeida, H., Campello, M., 2002. Financial Constraints and Investment-cash Flow Sensitivities: New Research Directions. Working paper. New York University. Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M., 2004. The cash ﬂow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance 59 (4), 1777–1804. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Levine, R., 2000. A new database on ﬁnancial development and structure. World Bank Economic Review 14, 597–605. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V., 02 2005. Financial and legal constraints to growth: does ﬁrm size matter? Journal of Finance 60 (1), 137–177. Bond, S., Elston, J.A., Mairesse, J., Mulkay, B., 09 2003. Financial factors and investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a comparison using company panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1), 153–165. Bond, S., Harhoff, D., Reenen, J.V., 1999. Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany. Working Papers WP99/5. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Chakraborty, S., Ray, T., March 2006. Bank-based versus market-based ﬁnancial systems: a growth-theoretic analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (2), 329–350. Cleary, S., 04 1999. The relationship between ﬁrm investment and ﬁnancial status. Journal of Finance 54 (2), 673–692. Cummings, J.G., Hassett, K.A., Oliner, S.D., June 2006. Investment behavior, observable expectations, and internal funds. American Economic Review 96 (3), 796–810. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V., September 2002. Funding growth in bank-based and market-based ﬁnancial systems: evidence from ﬁrm-level data. Journal of Financial Economics 65 (3), 337–363. Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., 1988. Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 78 (2), 141–195. Fazzari, S.M., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., May 2000. Investment-cash ﬂow sensitivities are useful: a comment on Kaplan and Zingales. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (2), 695–705. Gilchrist, S., Himmelberg, C., 1996. Evidence on the role of cash ﬂow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 541– 572. Gomes, J.F., December 2001. Financing investment. American Economic Review 91 (5), 1263–1285. Harford, J., December 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance 54 (6), 1969–1997. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., Scharfstein, D., February 1991. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1), 33–60. Kaplan, S.N., Zingales, L., 1997. Do investment-cash ﬂow sensitivities provide useful measures of ﬁnancing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (1), 196–215. Kaplan, S.N., Zingales, L., May 2000. Investment-cash ﬂow sensitivities are not valid measures of ﬁnancing constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (2), 707–712. Khurana, I.K., Martin, X., Pereira, R., 2006. Financial development and the cash ﬂow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41 (04), 787–808. Kim, Chang-Soo, Mauer, D.C., Sherman, A.E., 1998. The determinants of corporate liquidity: theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33, 335–359. Levine, R., October 2002. Bank-based or market-based ﬁnancial systems: which is better? Journal of Financial Intermediation 11 (4), 398–428. Love, I., 2003. Financial development and ﬁnancing constraints: international evidence from the structural investment model. Review of Financial Studies 16, 765–791. Mairesse, J., Hall, B.H., Mulkay, B., Dec 1999. Firm-level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty Years. Nber working papers. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Moyen, N., October 2004. Investment–cash ﬂow sensitivities: constrained versus unconstrained ﬁrms. Journal of Finance 59 (5), 2061–2092. Myers, S.C., 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 25, 25–43. Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., Williamson, R., 1999. The determinants and implications of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics 52, 3–46.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document