Preview

Hay Paradox Of Punishment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hay Paradox Of Punishment
Joe Saelmi
Crim 402- Willis
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Hay’s Paradox on Punishment

When examining punishments and laws of the seventeen and eighteen hundreds it is easy to see the paradox pointed out by Douglas Hay. As societies grew through the ages and Man became more civilized, men with wealth also became more interested in control. Especially during Feudal times, it is easy to see how those with power were bent on keeping it, and how those without it would strive to make ends meet. They say poverty is a leading factor in crime, yet the laws that were made to keep the rich man’s wealth also contributed to more poverty and possibly more crime. Between the years 1688 and 1820 the number of laws punishable by death rose from
…show more content…
Nearly all of the statutes created in this era pertained to property offenses. You would think that with the number of laws and convictions on the rise the number of executions would increase as well. However, the number of people put to death actually declined. Thus is the paradox identified by Hay. “The number of executions did not increase to match the number of convictions,” (1975: pg. 22). According to Hay, this could be attributed to the raising number of pardons given out by judges, where they could recommend the offender be transported instead of being put to death. Property had become sacred. Your life could be summed up by your wealth and personal gains and therefore violating some one else’s property could be punished. Even John Locke argued that the purpose of a government was to preserve property. This was clearly the stance of the Parliament. They passed law after law and introduced act after act in order to keep their statutes up to date to increase prosecution against new property crimes. The poor started looting wreckage washed in from a shipwreck. They made laws against that because the property they took belonged to a king or a noble of some kind, but more importantly it wasn’t their property to take. Therefore it was punishable by death. The price of food was raised so the poor began raiding mills and rioting, so soon they made a law against that as well and so on and so forth. Anytime there was an issue concerning property a law was introduced as a method of deterrence. The wealthy felt that people would shy away from crime if the punishment was heavy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the time period of the late sixteenth century to the late eighteenth century the concept of what nobility is and what it was conceived to be varied greatly as more modern thoughts developed and desperation of monarchs grew to meet such demand. The arguments related to nobility differed greatly, but these were the most crucial; the difference between the sword and the robe and the right to even hold such a position at all.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law that reflects the interest of the ruling-class society enhances the principles of capitalism, which Chambliss (1976) argues has bred a nature within the people that consist of greed, self-interest and hostility. This, Chambliss argues, is what essentially motivates crime and deviance at all levels of society. Gordon (1976) supports this by arguing that crime is a ‘rational’ response to a ‘dog-eat-dog’ society where selfishness and competition is more profound as opposed to public duty and collective wellbeing.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chambliss argues that crime occurs throughout all social strata – the major differences being the nature of the crimes committed and the amount of law…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although criminal behaviour and activity is found most commonly in poorer economic societies it is also, although less common, found in middle and upper class societies too. This statement is supported by sociologist Emile Durkheim who said ‘there is no society that is not confronted with the problem of criminality’ (1938, 65-66). This is the view of a social positivist and relates to the first model of crime, the predestined actor model which looks at internal and external determinism. His book The Division of Labour in Society described how in periods of social change, in this case industrial development, consequences…

    • 3082 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early English Law

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A) Early English law sought not only to deter crime and immoral behaviour but to exert social control, particularly over the lesser mortals, nothing changes.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Old Regime

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Old Regime consisted of three elements and one of those elements was politics which was based on power and who or what ruled over a certain region. The 18th century was known as the great age of the aristocracy. The nobility had an approximately 1 to 5 percent of the entire population of any country that was given. Yet it was known that in every country the nobility was the single wealthiest sector of the population and had the widest degree of social, economic and political power; they also set the tone of polite society.1 “The British nobility was known as the smallest, wealthiest, best defined, and most socially responsible aristocracy resided in Great Britain.”2. The French nobility were known as “one of the sword” and “of the sword”.3 When it came to peasants it is told that most French peasants owned some land, but there were few serfs in eastern France. Also that nearly all French peasants were subject to certain feudal dues, they included the required use for payment of the lord’s mill to grind grain and his oven to bake bread.4 This basically means that many peasants in this time had no political right to run themselves and their lives especially because they had to pay taxes. Since they did not have any rights they would work for the King in order…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    From the seventeenth century to the late twentieth century there has been a change in society creating a modernist era which saw the ending of feudalism and the devotement of capitalism. (Hudson, 2003:3) This period saw changes in the way individuals lived their lives and viewed the world; there were political changes and systems of punishment. The changes stirred ‘political, moral and legal philosophy – the fields at whose intersection we find justice.’(Hudson, 2003:3)…

    • 2724 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime In The 19th Century

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the nineteenth century why did criminals continue to break the law when the punishment was so barbaric? Despite the Industrial Revolution, crime was on the rise. Was crime due to poverty and the lack of education, more prosperity-induced than poverty-induced, or was it based on where you came from? The Penal System in England during the nineteenth century did not seem fair. Regardless of the reason for criminal activity, the punishment didn’t seem to fit the crime either.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It was during the time of the Tudors of England (15th – 16th century) that scholars began to practice the rules of statutory interpretation and literary analysis and apply the methodology much in the way that Coke, Stubbs, McKechnie and others would later interpret Magna Carta; starting literally, expanding through a purposive approach whereas avoiding incongruities, . The outcome of such an interpretation allows for the expansion of meaning in the direction of contemporary applicability and relevance. Whilst Magna Carta’s original declarations maybe somewhat diminished by its many reiterations, there is no question its original purpose, to enact the rights and freedom of all men, has been replaced by contemporary interpretations, that most certainly demonstrate Magna Carta promised little, but delivered a…

    • 3448 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This study shows that people turn to crime only if they learn that the income outweigh the consequences of committing that. Both in Orwell’s time and the present time, people living in poverty are more likely to commit crime.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes’s definition of punishment clearly asserts that a punishable offense must constitute a “transgression of the law.” This short, seemingly banal, provision forms the central tenet of Hobbes’s punishment theory—a tenet from which various subsidiary conclusions can be drawn. Contrary to notions of sovereign omnipotence, a careful analysis of Hobbes’s conception of law as it pertains to punishment reveals limitations to sovereign authority in the form of a ‘positive legal order’ (Cattaneo 1965; Hüning 2007).…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This essay also examines the social changes and penal reforms in 19th century England which caused a shift in societal perspectives towards crime and punishment, and how these impacted the design of three major prisons at that time.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offenders, who committed a crime, were punished for the offense. Physical force was used instead of jail. Jails housed offenders who were awaiting trial and individual who could not pay their debts. In this paper, Learning Team A will discuss the various forms of punishment exercised in the 1700s, the crimes that led to the forms of punishment, and the criteria between various societies for criminal sentencing during the 1700s. Learning Team A will also describe prisons for women and the difference between prisons for men and juveniles.…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    report on poverty

    • 291 Words
    • 1 Page

    Whether poverty fosters crimes remains a continued source of contention politicians, socialists, economists, psychologist as well as members of the general public. On the one hand, opponents of the debate claim that the problem of crime in the society should be qualified as the consulted outcome of poor structural on security and reliable mechanisms for the nurturing and safeguarding of responsible citizens (Regoli, et al., 2009). On the other hand, proponents in the debate assert of the far-reaching effects of poverty in negating the socioeconomic wellbeing of the people as well as the ability by the government to engage in effective security measures (Kriesberg, 2009). All in all, given evidence of a strong link between poverty andinability by individuals to engage in useful activities, there is no doubt that poverty foster crime. This paper is a critical argument in support of the view that poverty foster crime.…

    • 291 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abstract: As Hobbes said that in the state of nature people were nasty, brutish and their life was short. Locke viewed that the people in the state of nature agreed a social contract in order to establish a formal law. In Rousseau‟s view, the social contract was done for the security of property and liberty. Thus from the very beginning of the origin of state, the concept of crime and ways of preventing it or if not, punishing the wrong-doer existed. The punishment system is an integral part of criminal justice and for maintaining social security. The progress of civilization has resulted in the change in the theory, method and motive of punishment.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics