Preview

Hate Speech In Social Media

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hate Speech In Social Media
The trade-off between ensuring free speech and restricting hate speech has been the ire of government across the international community. With the advent of social media, this issue has only become more contentious. Social media platforms such as facebook, twitter, and instagram are increasingly becoming forms of debate, tension, and animosity rather than serving their original purpose; to be a refreshing escape of pleasant social interactions and meeting. Yet, it is the social media companies themselves that are under the most heat as of late. Blame that is traditionally placed on government and political institutions has shifted towards the tech firms of silicon valley and the priority of these firms in regards of restrictions on speech has …show more content…
Now, more than ever, social media platforms are hubs for people to share trending articles, news stories, and columns and subsequently voice their opinion on them. If hate speech is defined as speech that attacks individuals and groups based on structural irreversible aspects of their identity, then it should be noted that many of these controversial articles are definitionally examples of hate speech. To restrict every instance of hate speech is to put social media users in monotonous bubbles; in echo chambers lacking any diversity of thought. That is the sort of safe space that is made the topic of political correctness in educational settings so prominent. By no means of advocating for rash, abrasive, and hurtful commentary to cloud the world wide web, if speech is constitutionally permissible and carries factual merit, then social media platforms are in no position to place restrictions. Providing the masses with as much information as possible, so long as that information is real prevents the kind of ignorance and closed-mindedness that causes divisive rhetoric to consume our present …show more content…
Essentially what eventually became known as the fighting words doctrine outlined that words that inflict injury or tend to incite immediate breach of the peach shall not be deemed legal. Undoubtedly, there is a fine line that makes it difficult to determine what is and what is not a form of fighting words. In that regard, social media companies do have some discretion as to which forms of hate speech they will tolerate. However, well erring on the side of greater restriction may be considered safe. These platforms must be weary of their actions potentially overstretching their grounds. Thus, it is clear because the United States Constitution does uphold certain forms of hate speech, social media platforms must allow constitutionally protected speech on their websites. If not, they risk imposing upon the democratic values of the US, as well as the diversity of thoughts that this country was founded upon. The dichotomy of free speech versus hate speech is one of great contention and the worst thing that any social media platform can do, is to approach this matter with a black or white stance. Evidently complex issues demand complex

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Do Words Matter?

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when your freedom becomes hurtful or disrespectful to someone else? There are so many different kinds of people and different things that offend each person. In this day where we are more inclined to say whatever we want, we see more and more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended?…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Federal law defines a hate crime as whenever the victim is attacked on the basis of his or her race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation or gender; hate offenses are directed against members of a particular group simply because of their membership in that group” (Levin & McDebitt, 1993). Hate crimes have been around for far too long. The first hate crime that was ever documented was in 1922, and that was just the first time that it was documented. Hate crimes were most likely going on long before this incident took place in Louisiana. The FBI encountered a rising in the Ku Klux Klan; it was a white supremacies movement. Two people were kidnapped and murdered and there were thousands of other people who received threats. The Ku Klux Klan and other racist groups committed thousands and thousands of hate crimes sense 1922. “Just in the last couple months, three men were indicated in New Mexico for assaulting a disabled minority. Another man was sentenced for putting a hangman noose on the front door of a minority’s house in Louisiana. In Massachusetts another man was sentenced for burning a predominantly African American church” (Two Men Sentenced for Racially-Motivated Assault, 2012). There are hundreds more stories just like these going on every day. Just because people do not hear about hate crimes as often as they used to, does not mean that they are not still happening.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    We are a nation that has always been for the people and by the people. We are known as the land of opportunity because of the amount of job opportunities, our voting processes, and our unlimited amount of patriotic citizens. There would no longer be that passion and drive of the American people if there were limitations enforced on their right to freedom of speech. Our society and population density would slowly decline overtime as the people have less say because that’s what separates us from the rest of the world. If we don’t have that, we aren’t truly a land of opportunity. America is just equal to every other nation. Where the people follow strict laws and have little to no say in the government that rules the land they love. George Washington once stated: “If freedom of speech is taken away. Then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter” (Washington). Arguably, this is what occurs in North Korea today. However, while we strive so hard to keep this inalienable right, we must now recognize the complications created with the newest forum for freedom of speech – the Internet. While we strive to protect our basic right, we could very well lose the country we love so much if we don’t develop censorship means to stop the spreading propaganda and recruitment by such evil forces as ISIS. Censorship by targeting such accounts is a must in order for our very…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ellen Goodman Hate Speech

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is a fine line in what is considered freedom of speech and what impedes on another person’s freedom. In fact John Stuart Mill states in his book On Liberty, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (1978, 9). The use of hate speech has a strong impact, especially in minority groups where the support system is not very strong. One example hate speech being persecuted is in an article from the website Grapevine titled Ten Charged with Hate Speech Towards LGBT Community. While some individuals may argue that the freedom of speech is the right of all Americans, there are definitely limits when it comes to the hatred and harassment of a particular group. The law enacted which included sexual orientation in the group where hate speech is not allowed stemmed from the fact that the suicide rate for LGBT teens is much higher than it is for other teens. The Trevor project found LGBT teens are 4 times more likely to attempt…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limitations on freedoms of society are crucial, especially in America. As Roger Rosenblatt noted in his essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” many people express their freedom of speech in very offensive and controversial ways. Often their expressions violate other amendments and freedoms as well.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racism In Society

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    These tweets consists of vulgar and offensive slurs towards all races. A study by Demos found that there are six different ways to tweet race-bound slurs: Any type of negative stereotype; a casual use of the slurs; trying to directly target abuse of any kind; appropriated meaning, saying something to benefit oneself and not others around them; non-derogatory or lessening the value of others; and lastly offline action or in other words writing an insult that goes on and continues in the real world not just through social media (1). These are just six of the main types of slurs and vulgar tweets many people have posted on Twitter alone. However, according to most people, over 70% proclaim that these tweets mean nothing and are being used in a non-derogatory fashion (Demos, 1). Even so, some of the words and text that many people tweet can always be seen as filthy and crude. A few of the top words are; p***y which is used in 4% of all tweets (an average of 410 a day); p**I used in 11% of tweets (average of 1,170 a day); and the number one word being, white-boy which is used in almost half of tweets posted, 48.9% (average of 4,890 a day) (2). These numbers are only increasing as social media itself increases. The Anti-Social Media estimates “around 50-70% of tweets were used to express in group solidary with ‘re-claimed’ slurs used within ethnic groups.”…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that there should be something done about hate speech, but banning it is not the answer. We were provided the first amendment for a reason. After years of oppression under the british crown, our founding fathers knew that there should never be limits on what can be communicated. Allowing a government to stop hate speech opened room for abuse. Any…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don’t have to define to you what social media is, we all use it on a daily basis. If I was speaking to an older audience I may have to explain, but to be honest most of you are going to go home and log onto Facebook. It has always been a part of our world and it probably always will be. Sadly, one part of social media that we are very aware of is that it is often used to harm, to hurt – this is clearly evident in the numerous accounts of cyber bullying. I do not intend to pretend that there aren’t negative aspects of social media; I am simply trying to emphasise the enormous power and influence that it holds. If we could harness this power and rather use it to protect and assist in law enforcement the advantages would be tremendous.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is hard to go one day without seeing some form of hate speech. I see examples of it on social media platforms on a daily basis. People do not think about the negative effects that occurs because of what they said. Moreover, the people who face hate speech may feel angered or frustrated enough that they, too, perpetuate hate speech. People do not care to listen to those who claim hate speech is an issue because they think that the 1st Amendment gives them the right to say anything they want without consequences. The freedom of speech does not mean that you should say negative things to those of a different race or religion.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of school shootings, cracking down on potential threats has become priority. Not only are there threats of mass violence, but racist speech and sexist speech, that some would define as fighting words. A question to ask is when does speech become a fighting word. Having to decide what speech is protected by the first amendment, worthwhile, and what speech has no social value and is not protected, worthless, is controversial. Speech that is defined as worthless include: lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and fighting words. Focusing on fighting words and the ever developing world of technology, we will examine a present-day situation of words that wound and compare them to past cases.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    University are vague. The Brown code should be made clearer so that the students and…

    • 393 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As social media becomes a heavy influence in our online presence, certain elements need to be policed, as laws can still be broken. This is an insight into if social media, more specifically social networking sites, can be regulated to avoid recent spates of ‘trolling’ or whether it only serves to strip people of freedom to speech.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays