Preview

Hate Speech And Policy Synthesis Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hate Speech And Policy Synthesis Essay
Hate speech as defined by the legal dictionary is described as follows:
“Hate speech is spoken words that are offensive, insulting, and/or threatening to an individual or group based on a particular attribute of that person or persons being targeted. Targeted attributes include such traits as ethnic background, sexual orientation, race, or disability, though there are other target attributes. In the U.S., another term for hate speech is “fighting words,” as such talk is likely to provoke an otherwise reasonable person into acting rashly against speaker doing the provoking”(Legal Dictionary, 2017, para.3) With so much social media and other technological outlets available in today’s society, hate speech can also be words that are posted on those sites or spoken in pod casts or news casts etc. In 2014 several Democratic House Representatives “proposed legislation that would require the government to study hate speech on the Internet, mobile phones and television and radio” (Kasperowicz, 2014, para.1). One of the debates
…show more content…
(2013). Presentation: Worldview Implications for Policy Analysis. Lynchburg, VA.
Kasperowicz, P. (2014, Janurary 17). The Hill: 13 House Democrats offer bill demanding government study on Internet hate speech. Retrieved from Jefferies.House.gov: https://jeffries.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/the-hill-13-house-democrats-offer-bill-demanding-government-study-on
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2015). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. ISBN: 9781483345789.
Legal Dictionary. (2017). Hate Speech. Retrieved from Legal Dictionary: https://legaldictionary.net/hate-speech/
Quigley, M. (2016). Hate speech has no place in our society or governement. Retrieved from Congressman Mike Quigley Representing the 5th District of Illinois:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sean McElwee overall claim in "The Case for Censoring Hate Speech" , is showing how people are easily influenced by the media, websites known as Reddit, Facebook, and twitter. Which allow bigot comments, #hashtags, and remarks to certain touchy topics. The article also talks about the two targets of hate speech, one being a way to target a minority and uplift sectarians of the world. The author uses words in the text to show a serious, concerned and progressive tone for the audience .In the article the author shows how he is progressive, by mentioning how we need to all blame ourselves and put forth effort to fix it.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Davis, S. (2011). Are you serious? Emanuel Cleaver on the “n” word and other issues. National Journal. para.5, 7. Washington, D.C. Retrieved by http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/emanuel-cleaver-obama-will-face-either-romney-or-huntsman-20110915…

    • 2051 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the narrow basis for the constitutionality of legislation restricting hate speech, Rothstein J. held that additional language of the Saskatchewan Code extending to expression that "ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity" of persons on the basis of a prohibited ground was not justified under s. 1 of the Charter, and thus of no force and…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Vandalized by Speech” by Gregory Rodriguez, he claims that hate speech is form of vandalism. He compares the subject to a broken window; if left untended, it signals people to do more damage. Rodriguez states that any discussion of the subject leads to the invocation of the 1st Amendment. He goes on to say that hate speech is a threat to our democracy and society, and it should be regulated. Additionally, Rodriguez argues that hate speech is making appearances everyone from political campaigns to college pep bands. He claims that minorities bear an extra burden when entering the public space. He also points out that negative campaigning leads to less political participation. Furthermore, Rodriguez argues that rhetorical vandalism…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Proponents advocating for speech codes on college campuses claimed that it provided a safe environment for the campuses affiliates. Students should not have had to fear repercussions for their "immutable characteristics" or opinions based on theories, beliefs, or morals (Fraleigh and Tuman, 1997, p. 170). Hate speech, which is any form of insult directed at a single group based on a similar characteristic, was the trigger that jump started speech codes. Regarded by some as unnecessary for the learning environment, hate speech has provoked many violent crimes, but even fiercer battles within the walls of the courtroom. Proponents maintained that hate speech was comparable to fighting words, a type of speech that does not receive First Amendment protection (Hudson Jr., 2005). Speech codes were not developed to restrict speech, but to protect the victims from the offensive words made by others on a college campus.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clintoncare

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: * Birkland,T.A.(2011). An introduction to the policy process:theories,concepts,and models of public making, (3rd Ed) Armonk,NY Sharpe Inc.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author argues that regulating the Internet’s hate speech limits free speech. Starr also uses pathos by mentioning religious books such as the Qur’an and the Bible in order to appeal to his audience by saying that removing certain speech from the Internet is like removing messages from these books. He also provides the reader with evidence by saying that the Internet already has censorship inducing people to report things that might be offensive, that statement contradicts his main argument but he does a good use of it by mentioning that this is a way to behave in a authoritarian manner, seeking to regulate everything we say in the internet. Starr arguments seem to be well organized, because she provides examples and evidence in order to convey her arguments. She uses logos by presenting statistics in which she shows the percentage of hate speech contained in all Web…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether it's through the internet or verbally conflicts occur and can end up in physical violence. People believe hate speech should be censored and prohibited from the 1st amendment. They believe that not everything you say should be protected by the first amendment. Advocates are concerned about the increase of incidents , threats , and potential hate crimes. With the first amendment being as lenient as it is on what we can say a lot of hate speech is…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article titled, “Colleges Should Censor Racist Hate Speech,” (Virginia Law Review, March 1990) Daryl Brown concludes that colleges should censor hate speech on campus and the prominence of blatant and subtle racism on campus will require a two prong…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate speeches has its very negative background and with it come hateful groups and very heinous actions. Nothing good has come from hate speech and it has only been destructive towards the youth and the laws that hate speech hides under shouldn’t be the only reason that these people should be able to use this type of speech. Hate speech causes underlying issues and shouldn’t be popularized or made for as a joke. Hate speech encourages negativity between races,religions,political views, and sexual orientation. Hate speech should banned just like everything else in this world that is no good for anyone.The destructive behaviors that are imitated by children who already use such behavior and they become homophobes and xenophobes.Hate speech should have never existed and therefore needs to be erased as soon as…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of school shootings, cracking down on potential threats has become priority. Not only are there threats of mass violence, but racist speech and sexist speech, that some would define as fighting words. A question to ask is when does speech become a fighting word. Having to decide what speech is protected by the first amendment, worthwhile, and what speech has no social value and is not protected, worthless, is controversial. Speech that is defined as worthless include: lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and fighting words. Focusing on fighting words and the ever developing world of technology, we will examine a present-day situation of words that wound and compare them to past cases.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is no need at all for the government’s use or enforcement of hate crimes, they charge people with double jeopardy and for speaking there mind. Which breaks the constitution not only once but twice.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Hate Crimes

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States of America has a long dark history in terms of racism, from the civil war to World War II minority groups have been the target of crimes of hatred and prejudice. From public lynching, cross burning, arson to vandalism are just some of the tactics used by hate groups to display their prejudice. According to the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) the term hate crime was not used until the 1980s, however investigations conducted by the FBI on hate related crime stretches far back to the First World War, on the group called the Ku Klux Klan attracted their attention. The department of justice defines a hate crime as “Hate crime is the violence of intolerance and bigotry, intended to hurt and intimidate someone because of their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious, sexual orientation, or disability. The purveyors of hate use explosives, arson, weapons, vandalism, physical violence, and verbal threats of violence to instill fear in their victims, leaving them vulnerable to more attacks and feeling alienated, helpless, suspicious and fearful.” Communities such as people of color and LGBT are two groups that had been overwhelming impacted from white supremacist groups and anti-gay group. Crimes motivated by hatred have led to legislation that requires the tracking of statistical data to gather information and…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year of 2017, we are living in a time were we can communicate on many different platforms (Television, Online, Radio, Podcast, etc.) more than ever had before. The age where people can focus on the words that offend the few and not the masses that gets ingored. As well the age where individuals can easily express their views, whether is it a popular opinion or not. Which is within every American citizen first amendment rights; But what’s the limit when hate speech turns into a hate crime? the three examples I am using are come from the last five years.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays