Harun Minah

Topics: Communication, Ethnic conflict, Malaysia Pages: 51 (8484 words) Published: December 3, 2014
MALAY-CHINESE INTERETHNIC COMMUNICATION IN MALAYSIA: AN
ANALYSIS OF SENSEMAKING IN EVERYDAY EXPERIENCES

A dissertation presented to
the faculty of
the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University

In partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree
Doctor of Philosophy

Minah Harun
March 2007

This dissertation entitled
MALAY-CHINESE INTERETHNIC COMMUNICATION IN MALAYSIA: AN
ANALYSIS OF SENSEMAKING IN EVERYDAY EXPERIENCES

by
MINAH HARUN

has been approved for
the School of Communication Studies
and the Scripps College of Communication by

Claudia L. Hale
Professor of Communication Studies

Gregory J. Shepherd
Dean, Scripps College of Communication

Abstract

HARUN, MINAH, Ph.D., March 2007, Communication Studies
MALAY-CHINESE INTERETHNIC COMMUNICATION IN MALAYSIA: AN
ANALYSIS OF SENSEMAKING IN EVERYDAY EXPERIENCES
(370 pp.)
Director of Dissertation: Claudia L. Hale
This dissertation explores everyday communication patterns among ethnic Malays and Chinese in multicultural Malaysia. Specifically, the study examines communication strategies and the concept of sensemaking (Weick, 1969, 1979, 1995) in interethnic interpersonal communication processes. Because interethnic communication requires individuals, as social organisms (Blumer, 1969), to possess intercultural sensitivity (Condon & Yousef, 1975; Orbe, 1995), the notions of ethnicized knowledge and sensemaking in interactions involving different Asian groups merit further examination. In order to engage in this work, researchers must get inside the defining process of the socially diverse actors to further understand their symbolic (inter)actions (Blumer, 1969). This study demonstrates how ethnic sensemaking is co-constructed and represented through the dynamics of negotiated strategies including tactical ambiguities in interpersonal interethnic relationships. Data for the study were collected through a qualitative interpretive approach which included in-situ observations in a natural setting and in-depth interviews among selected individuals from two ethnic groups, and a study of relevant government documents and media coverage on the subjects. The data were analyzed using a rhetorical framework that focused on sensemaking. The study

demonstrates that an understanding of interethnic communication as a social phenomenon is very critical in programs promoting societal integration in multicultural contexts. Approved:
Claudia L. Hale
Professor of Communication Studies

Preface

Analytical autoethnography, as advocated by Anderson (2006), allows me to delve into what has been a long standing, personal concern with the tendentious ethnic consciousness in the Malaysian society which, intersects with, and at times, inhibits my natural ability to engage in interpersonal communication with others. My late father, to whom this dissertation is dedicated, was always spirited in his desire to see me communicate with anyone who is civil and equally desirous of connecting positively. My own social experience with cross-cultural and interethnic relationships so far, however, is more complicated.

I have come to terms with the gloomy pictures presented in gossip, blogs and even academic writings that contrast sharply with my own experience. This experience has led me to believe that productive interpersonal communication, whether with one’s family members or with strangers from other ethnic groups, depends on what is perceived and enacted, as well as on the reactions received from other interlocutors. On the higher plane, despite much ado about civil rights and nation-building based on the multicultural rights, there is an unfortunate oversight of the obvious, that is, an understanding of how ethnic individuals communicate with one another. The attainment of these loftier goals depends on a deep understanding and appreciation of the nature of communication as necessary social skills at the individual level in multiethnic...

References: selfhood, and in turn, forces an adjustment in the construction of identity” (Ellis,
1999, p
Background
The symbolic interactionist perspective (Blumer, 1969) posits that the social
action of the actor is not only constructed by him/her but affects his/her identity (Ellis,
1999)
ethnicity will always be a focal point in any tensions (Brubaker, 2004; Ellis, 1999; Kim,
1994; Scollon & Scollon, 1981; Shamsul, 1998c; Simonsen, 2005; Tan, 1982)
some would argue that ethnicity might not always be at issue in interpersonal encounters
(Clement & Giles, 1994; Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
(Eriksen, 2002) and go beyond the groupist syndrome, as Brubaker (2004) argued, which
is “the tendency to take bounded groups as fundamental units of analysis (and basic
Bailey, B. (1997). Communication of respect in interethnic service encounters. Language
in Society, 26, 327-356.
Baldwin, J. R., Perry, S. D., & Moffitt, M. A. (2004). Communication theories for
everyday life
Banton, M. (1997). Ethnic and racial consciousness (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Barr, M. (2006). The charade of meritocracy. Far Eastern Economic Review, 169, 18-22.
Barr, M. D., & Low, J. (2005). Assimilation as multiracialism: The case of Singapore’s
Malays
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1-22.
Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: dialogues & dialectics. New
York: The Guilford Press.
Beck, C. S. (2005). Becoming the story: Narratives as collaborative, social enactment of
individual, relational, and public identities
Berger, C. R. (1996). Interpersonal communication. In M. B. Salwen & D. W. Stacks
(Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp.277296)
Berlo, D. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bochner, A. P. (1989). Interpersonal communication. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An
introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.)
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An
introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.)
Bormann, E. G. (1983). Rhetoric as a way of knowing: Earnest Bormann and fantasy
theme analysis
Bowen, E. S. (1964). Return to laughter. Garden City, NY: Double Day.
Britten, N. (1995). Qualitative research: Qualitative interviews in medical research.
Broeder, P. (1993). Learning to understand in interethnic communication. Issues in
Applied Linguistics, 4, 57-89.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Harun Yahya's Works and Global Freemasonry Essay
  • Court Case Between Encik Harun Bin Hassan and Oceanpac Sdn. Bhd. Essay
  • Essay on Season and Different Kinds

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free