Harry S. Truman Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
There has always been a debate on the necessity of the bomb, but its implications were so severe that such an attack has never been carried out again. Through the Mock Trial, Harry S. Truman was put on trial for crimes against humanity. At the end of the three day trial, and after much deliberation the jury came to the decision that Harry S. Truman was guilty of crimes against humanity. I was not fully content with this decision, however, I am able to understand why the jury came to the decision that they made.
First of all, the jury felt that even though bombing was required to end the war, the US could have dropped conventional bombs. We came to this conclusion since Admiral William stated that the conventional bombs "would have had a similar
…show more content…
We were convinced this way since Admiral William stated "President Truman convinced everyone that the AB would target the military base and the Japanese would surrender, but there was no military benefit when dropping the bomb." We felt that the killing of innocent civilians was immoral and therefore a crime against humanity which simply could not be justified. We came to this conclusion when we were shown evidence 7 which showed the injuries faced by the victims. I believe that by this point the attorneys were trying to use a sympathetic maneuver to convince the jury that Harry S. Truman was guilty which was very clever because it worked. This tactic used by the attorney prevented the jury from looking beyond this point so the jury was very stubborn in their views during our deliberation. "Japanese citizens even today continue to suffer from the radioactive effects of the bomb." (Jade, closing statement) Once she stated this we felt that the dropping of the atomic bomb could not be justified due to the fact that we believed it was a crime against humanity since it had killed 80,000 people and severely injured many more causing them excruciating

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Atomic Bomb

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States Decision to drop the Atomic bomb has been a controversial topic since the day the first bomb was dropped August 6, 1945. President Harry Truman made the ultimate decision to use the atomic bomb, to him it was a clear decision that this would end the war with America’s most hated enemy: Japan (Nathan, 2012). There had been thousandths of bloody deaths up to-this-point in the war, Japan was destroyed, they had just about nothing, their country was in starvation, the domestic infrastructure was ruined, both sides knew that America was going to win. The question was not if it was when? (Nathan, 2012) Truman’s decision in using the bomb was not taken lightly it came down to several factors but ultimately he wanted the war to end as soon as possible with the fewest U.S casualties (Maddox, 1995).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Harry Truman is justified for sending atomic bombs from the United States to Japan civilian cities. Two parts of Japan in particular named Hiroshima and Nagasaki were targeted to kill off the civilians. The bombs were supposed to target a certain range of people, the hiroshima ranged from 90,000 to 146,000 and the Nagasaki ranged from 39,000 to 80,000 deaths. These bombs initiated the action of surrender from Japan and this happened on August 15, 1945. There are documents that prove Harry Truman should be justified for the participation in winning the war for the United States.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb was a difficult decision for one man to make. However, before he could ever make that difficult decision he first had to be told the weapon was even an option. The atomic bomb was a closely guarded secret that only a select few even at the highest levels in the government had knowledge of. So when the decision was made to use the bomb it was made to save the lives of not only American servicemen but those of the Japanese empire as well. That faithful decision did take the lives of many civilians of Japan but it also saved more that it ever took. President Truman sacrificed a few to save the many which is extremely hard to accept when the majority of those killed were civilians of all ages…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propaganda taught in grade schools was that the United States dropped the atomic bomb to save American lives and end the war. President Truman and some advisors stated after the war, that somewhere between five hundred thousand to one million American lives would be loss with an invasion of the Japanese homeland (37). So, in an attempt to bring the War in the Pacific to an end they used the atomic bomb. They also justified the use of the atomic bomb by claiming using the bomb would save an untold number of Japanese lives. The information which came from President Truman and his administrative sounded sensible and salved the conscious of America, but was it the truth? In his book, historian J. Samuel Walker provides a step by step analysis of events leading to Truman’s use of the atomic bomb to bring World War II to closure and extensive coverage of the relationship of the United States and the U.S.S.R.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Time has done little to clarify the proverbial ‘truth’ of our leader’s motivations. Modern historians have many theories about what the deciding factors for dropping the bomb were. Most modern theories provided leave much to be desired and don’t offer the same feeling of substantive rightness that those closer in time to the event provide. Certainly a combination of many factors influenced the scales of decision President Truman used to decide on the best course of action. Unfortunately for historians much of the Manhattan project and the events of early 1945 were shrouded in secrecy for several decades. By the time archival documents had been released to the public the prevailing stories had been firmly set into the American historical perspective. This has…

    • 2492 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts, pg. 184). The decision to drop the bomb on Japan leans dangerously close towards the logic of…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Second World War changed the history of the world forever. Super powers emerged and other countries crumbled. Economies changed and new ways of life were becoming present. The United States emerged from the war as a world leader in government, economy and industry. Most credit is deservingly given to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt for the success and victory for the United States in the war. But in April of 1945, Roosevelt’s term came to an end with his unexpected death, and the weight of the war was put on Harry Truman.The German Army surrendered only eight days before Truman took office. For the war to come to a close, Truman would have to make vital decisions to bring the surrender of the Japanese. The decision that Truman made is questioned to this day. Were the bombs necessary?…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Don’t want to hassle through packing bags and travelling miles away to enjoy the Thanksgiving long weekend? If you have plans to stay back in Chicago with your family, you have enough to be thankful for – coz Chicago has a lot to offer! The extravaganza of the city and its merry crowd will guarantee the best holiday weekend with your family and kids.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Atomic Bomb put a huge mark in American history. It changed the way war takes place and introduced the amass weapons of destruction to warfare. The destructive force also wiped out hundreds of thousands of people, mainly consisting of women and children. Many people were appalled by America’s immoral effort to end the war. Others disagreed and stated that it was a necessary evil to drop the atomic bomb and end the war. Even 70 years after World War II this argument continues of whether it was appropriate to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While dropping the atomic bomb was cruel and immoral, it was essential to ending the war in the Japanese Theatre of World War II, it established America as an even greater power, and it saved American lives.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision that brought the prompt and utter destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki generates a lot of interest and controversy even today. Many people question Truman’s intentions in using the atomic bomb and its necessity to ending the war. In Prompt & Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bomb Against Japan, J. Samuel Walker provides an insight to the different choices Truman had to make and the factors that lead to Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs against Japan.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On August 6, 1945, President Truman decided that it was in the best interest of the United States to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. Many people would say that the decision that he made was unjustifiable and morally wrong, however; many of us think that it was justifiable. Having to face the biggest decision of his life, Truman thought that it was the only way to stop the war and keep innocent people from losing their lives. As the leader of the United States, Truman’s first priority was to protect the US citizens and make sure that they were safe. With the war going on with Japan, the United States, if we lost, was at risk of becoming a dictatorship. Truman was not going to let this happen.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The use of the atomic bomb remains controversial to this day. There are academics and policy makers of the time that still disagree on the whether it was justifiable to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They debate if it truly was in the interest of ending the war sooner and with less loss of life. Several issues played together to help form the opinion that Truman acted for more nefarious purposes. Domestic as well as international politics is said to have played a role in the decision of Truman to go ahead with the use of the atomic bomb . Would the Japanese have been willing to surrender without the dropping of the bomb? Some experts believe that because Japanese representatives were talking to the Russians about being…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays