Preview

Harrod's Sporting Goods

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1006 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Harrod's Sporting Goods
Case Analysis # 1
FINC 302

Profit Ratios for 2004:
Profit Margin= Net income ÷ Sales 193,200 ÷ 4,269,871 = 4.5%
Return on Assets a. Net income ÷ Total assets
193,200 ÷ 3,170,200 = 6.1% b. (Net income ÷ Sales) x (Sales ÷ Total Assets)
(193,200 ÷ 4,269,871) x (4,269,871 ÷ 3,170,200) = 6.1% Return on Equity a. Net income ÷ Stockholders Equity
193,200 ÷ 1,204,600 = 16% b. Return on Assets (investment) ÷ (1 – Debt/Assets)
.061 ÷ (1 – 1,965,600/3,170,200) = .061 ÷ .38 = 16%

Profit Ratios for 2005:
Profit Margin= Net income ÷ Sales 243,100 ÷ 4,483,360 = 5.4%
Return on Assets a. Net income ÷ Total assets
243,100 ÷ 3,360,650 = 7.2% b. (Net income ÷ Sales) x (Sales ÷ Total Assets)
(243,100 ÷ 4,483,360) x (4,483,360 ÷ 3,360,650) = 7.2% Return on Equity a. Net income ÷ Stockholders Equity
243,100 ÷ 1,310,655 = 18.5% b. Return on Assets (investment) ÷ (1 – Debt/Assets)
.072 ÷ (1 – 2,049,995/3,360,650) = .072 ÷ .39 = 18.5%

Profit Ratios for 2006:
Profit Margin= Net income ÷ Sales 200,318 ÷ 5,021,643 = 4%
Return on Assets a. Net income ÷ Total assets
200,318 ÷ 3,510,110 = 5.7% b. (Net income ÷ Sales) x (Sales ÷ Total Assets)
(200,318 ÷ 5,021,643) x (5,021,643 ÷ 3,510,110) = 5.7% Return on Equity a. Net income ÷ Stockholders Equity
200,318 ÷ 1,333,800 = 15% b. Return on Assets (investment) ÷ (1 – Debt/Assets)
.057 ÷ (1 – 2,176,310/3,510,110) = .057 ÷ .38 = 15%

For all three ratios (profit margin, return on assets, and return on equity) the trends from 2004 to 2006 remains the same. All three ratios increased from year 2004 to 2005, but dramatically decreased from 2005 to 2006 dropping below the percent ratios of 2004. The increase of Profit margin indicates that Harrods sporting goods had a higher return on the sales dollar which shows good cost control, the decrease (2005-2006) of the same ratio indicates the company having a lower return on the sales

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first would be Market Penetration. Wal-Mart has been successful in gaining customers from other electronic stores; however, I believe that their market share could be increased. In my personal opinion, Wal-Mart’s electronic section is equivalent to that of Best Buy. With increased consumer awareness of this, they could control a larger section of the market. Another strategy that could be used is Related Diversification. This can relate to their electronic Department by improving the products belonging to their in-house brand. Creating products equal in features to the name brands would create a possibility for increased consumption.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regina Audit Case

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I computed the ratios for 1986 as well as the required 1987 and 1988. The most interesting occurrence is how the values for the growth were not translated in the ratios. As sales increased, cost of goods sold decreased. This would indicate that either you raised prices of your product or you found a method to manufacture for less. If the latter were accurate, then I would assume that could be a chance of increased returns. Bank debt rose…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cintas Time Trend Analysis

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The table focuses on the profitability, the asset management and the leverage of Cintas Corporation. First lets focus on Cintas Corporation’s profitability. Cintas has steadily improved from 2009 to 2011. Profit Margin for Cintas has increased by .5% from 2009 to 2011. From 2009 to 2011 Cintas has increased its revenues, which is usually a good thing, but they have also allowed expenses to increase. Their profit margin was able to increase because Cintas increased revenue at a greater rate than their expenses. Cintas has also improved their return on equity from 2009 to 2011. Cintas return on equity improved by 1.17%. Growing return on equity is vital for Cintas profitability. The growing return on equity shows investors that Cintas could be a good company for their investment. With more investments come more opportunities for Cintas to increase revenue and profitability. The last ratio under profitability is return on assets. While profit margin and return on equity increased, return on assets decreased. Cintas return on assets decreased by .41% from 2009 to 2010. This is not good for Cintas. When Cintas return on assets decreased it means that Cintas did not do a good job of converting its assets or investment into profits for their company. This may have occurred because Cintas did not do a good job of using it’s investments and placing them in the correct areas that would benefit profits the most. Overall, Cintas profitability improved over the three-year span. One recommendation to help return on assets would be to figure out which area of the company needs the most investment and will give you the better return on your investment or assets. This could involve some type of analyst of each individual segment of…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To any company whether small or a large corporation, the financial analysis is very important in order for a successful business. This will determine if the company is healthy enough to invest or even to see where you are weak in the financial part of the business. It is the company’s responsibility to present accurate analysis of their financial reports. What I hope to present to you is information that you will help see the comparison of both companies within their financial standings. In this report I will present a vertical analysis and a horizontal analysis, and ratio analysis. I will also try to provide some strategies…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    harolds sporting goods

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. In analyzing the profitability of ratios for Harrods’s Sporting Goods, we observed that for the years 2007 and 2008 there were a higher return on sales dollars of 5% when in comparison to that of the industry average of 4.51 %. In 2009, Harrods’s Sporting Goods experienced a slightly decrease on its ROS with 4% below the industrial average of 4.5%' We also noticed that, Harrods’s Sporting Goods ROA for the years, 2007,2008,2009, was good as they were able to obtained an increase(6%,7% and 6%) above the industry average of 5.10% ,meaning they had a rapid turnover. With this information, the industry ratio produced a turnover on assets of 1.33 times in 2009. On the other hand, Harrods’s Sporting Goods generated a 1.43 times in2009 according to its ratio of sales to total assets in the same year. In conclusion, the fact that Harrods Sporting Goods produced a better average than the industry ratio in terms of sales per dollar of assets puts them in a better position to stay in businesses.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initial Assessment: An initial look at the ratio analysis reveals that the annual sales-growth rate has been holding around 15%. This is perhaps the only good news from the analysis. A performance discontinuity makes its appearance in FY 2000 as a drop in operating margin. This was a result of a 21% increase in production costs and expenses and a 20% increase in admin and selling expenses. There was also an inexplicable 95% increase in inventory. This jump in inventory and operating expenses appears to have been financed through debt, as the debt/equity and debt/total capital ratios increased during this period. Since the sales growth rate has held steady, there has been…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reebok Vs Caesar

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Compute financial ratios using the guidelines provided below. Use the component ratios of return on equity to explain the reasons for the difference in the profitability across the two firms. In other words, is profit margin, asset turnover or/and financial leverage responsible for the difference in profitability? Comment on the riskiness of the two companies based on the financial ratios. I would like you to compute the ratios for 1988, 1989 and 1990. Data to compute the ratios for 1990 are in the current financial statements. But to compute ratios for 1988 and 1989, you may have to get some data from notes and supplementary disclosures (all included in the case). I provide guidelines for this purpose below.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This analysis of Tootsie Roll shows a favorable trend in net sales over the past five years. Tootsie Roll showed a steady increase from 1997 through 2000. Net sales declined slightly from 2000 to 2001. The net earnings trend is also favorable from 1997 to 2000. 2001 shows a significant decline in net earnings. The reasons for such decreases in…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clarkson Lumber

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is apparent that there was a dramatic increase in sales during 1993-1995, and the trend seems to continue from 1996 1st quarter sales data. Sales rose by 19% in 1994, and 30% in 1995, and then back to 18% in 1996 1st quarter. In contrast, the gross profit margin and return on sales have remained relatively static over the three year period, while we can see a drop by approximately 1% of return on sales from the projected numbers of 1996. ROE, while improving greatly in 1994 to 18.3% has decrease slightly in 1995 to 17.1%.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goodwin Sporting Goods

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At Jim Jr.’s entry into the business, a direct sales model was implemented upon his recommendation to better the financial position of the company.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The profitability ratios associated with Costco from 2008-2011, show a lot of stability, but not as much growth as shareholders would like to see. Gross profit margin, operating profit margin, and the return on assets all appear to grow very slight from 2009 on, but there is a noticeable drop off that can be seen from the previous years before the macroeconomic challenges hit North America. The most noticeable upward trend can be seen with the operating profit margin. This margin increased from 2.49% in 2009 to 2.66% in 2010. It then increased to 2.74% in 2011. Return on equity dropped from 13.96% in 2008 to 10.84% in 2009. This rate has fluctuated slightly but has not been as low as it was after the macroeconomic…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ratio

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Next area we see is the profit margin. You see through the balance sheet that Kudler Fine foods over the board did pretty good when you look at it from a profit stand point. The way we calculated the profit margin was Net Income over sales and this was the information that we got:…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bass Pro Shops

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prepare a S.W.O.T. analysis for Bass Pro Shops. What types of strategies do you recommend based on your analysis?…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Return on Sales (Profit Margin) Ratio measures the profits after taxes on the year’s sales. The higher the ratio, the better prepared the business is to handle downtrends brought on by adverse conditions. Net Profit After Taxes ÷ Net Sales…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays