Harkness Discussion
13-1-22
harkness
The Harkness Discussion
The Harkness Discussion is a method of conducting and evaluating group discussion which was developed at Phillips Exeter Academy. The teacher acts as little as possible, serving mostly as an observer. The students participate in the discussion as a team: this is not a competition. Everyone is expected to contribute in such ways as the following: - organizing, leading - summarizing, restating, clarifying - offering examples from the text - asking questions - commenting or giving an opinion - making a suggestion - asking for clarification - reacting to comments - analyzing the text, a comment, or the discussion itself - restarting the discussion - filling in a hole - arguing a point - asking for new information - asking for comments or reactions - making connections with other texts, situations, or discussions Since this is a team effort, there will be a team grade. The whole class will get the same grade, with two exceptions: students who do not participate at all will be marked down; other students who perform truly exceptional group-benefit feats - for example by “saving” or immensely uplifting a discussion that is going bad - will be eligible for independent work credit. A discussion for which everyone would receive an “A” would look like this: - Everyone participates, and more or less equally. - The pace allows for clarity and thoughtfulness, but not sleep. - There is a sense of balance and order: focus in on one speaker and one idea at a time. - There is an attempt to resolve questions and issues before moving on to new ones. - There is a clear sense of what the group has covered and how. - The loud do not dominate; the shy are encouraged. Everyone is clearly understood. - Students are animated, sincere, helpful. - The conversation is lively. - When the process is not working, the group adjusts. Those unhappy with the process say so. - Students take risks and dig for new meanings. - Students back up what they
harkness
The Harkness Discussion
The Harkness Discussion is a method of conducting and evaluating group discussion which was developed at Phillips Exeter Academy. The teacher acts as little as possible, serving mostly as an observer. The students participate in the discussion as a team: this is not a competition. Everyone is expected to contribute in such ways as the following: - organizing, leading - summarizing, restating, clarifying - offering examples from the text - asking questions - commenting or giving an opinion - making a suggestion - asking for clarification - reacting to comments - analyzing the text, a comment, or the discussion itself - restarting the discussion - filling in a hole - arguing a point - asking for new information - asking for comments or reactions - making connections with other texts, situations, or discussions Since this is a team effort, there will be a team grade. The whole class will get the same grade, with two exceptions: students who do not participate at all will be marked down; other students who perform truly exceptional group-benefit feats - for example by “saving” or immensely uplifting a discussion that is going bad - will be eligible for independent work credit. A discussion for which everyone would receive an “A” would look like this: - Everyone participates, and more or less equally. - The pace allows for clarity and thoughtfulness, but not sleep. - There is a sense of balance and order: focus in on one speaker and one idea at a time. - There is an attempt to resolve questions and issues before moving on to new ones. - There is a clear sense of what the group has covered and how. - The loud do not dominate; the shy are encouraged. Everyone is clearly understood. - Students are animated, sincere, helpful. - The conversation is lively. - When the process is not working, the group adjusts. Those unhappy with the process say so. - Students take risks and dig for new meanings. - Students back up what they