Preview

Happiness is the only worthwhile goal in life."

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Happiness is the only worthwhile goal in life."
‘Happiness is the only worthwhile goal in life’ [15]
There are many other goals apart from happiness in life that are worth pursuing. Although Jeremy Bentham (inventor of first type of utilitarianism, act utilitarianism) famously said “nature has placed humanity under the rule of two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain”, it seems pleasure is not the only goal people strive for.
For example people may pursue a spiritual goal in life. Many people live under religious guide lines such as the Bible. This means following moral absolutes such as the Ten Commandments (thou shall not kill, steal etc.) even if happiness is not the end result. Many Christians believe that we live to please God and that personal happiness or satisfaction is irrelevant so pleasing God is the main goal in life.
Similarly, Immanuel Kant and his deontological philosophy states that people should live their lives according to duties that need to be fulfilled such as helping others in need. Kant argued that these duties should not be fulfilled with expectations of positive rewards or happiness – they should be done simply because they should be. Deontologists may say that happiness in not always the point but doing the right thing is and this is done through following moral obligatory duties.
Having considered the above arguments, however, it seems that even when you follow ‘duties’ because you naturally should it can still be seen as doing a positive thing so therefore it must bring about some form of happiness.
Happiness can be seen as physical pleasure which some may consider a distasteful and unworthy goal because it only satisfies our basic needs and physical natures. Many people berate act utilitarianism because it debases humans to essentially animals who do not think beyond, or to a higher capacity than, pleasure and pain.
Happiness as a goal may seem unrealistic and unobtainable because of the nature of life.
The pursuit of happiness could be argued as self-centred.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Notwithstanding the definition, happiness remains an ambiguous subject. The degree or manifestation of happiness varies wildly between two people even in the same social classes, and more drastically so in vastly different social circles. Happiness goals change with movement through belief systems and social classes This is displayed by taking a macro look at the world’s religions and cultures. For example, a Buddhists in China, Thailand and other Asian countries have many more and different rules pertaining to how to achieve a happy life, versus the middle class American who’s capitalist dreams don’t extend beyond getting rich quick.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Novelist Ayn Rand, in her book Anthem, wrote, “My happiness is not the means to any end. It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose”. Although happiness may seem like a simple concept to many, sometimes we don’t recognize it but we always take different paths, face many obstacles, and spend most of our lives trying to achieve happiness. Depending on the circumstances, every person has their own definition of what it means to attain happiness, whether through wealth, success, health, love etc. Happiness is a notion that be developed by focusing on the smaller things in life which are not given a great deal of thought to, but still can heavily impact us. One of these smaller yet significant ideas in life is individualism. Today…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The word Deon is the Greek word for “duty” which is the central focus on Kant’s moral reasoning. It is the fulfillment of one’s moral duties and obligations to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do by the use of reason, logic, critical thinking and moral intuition, the moral duty to just do the right thing. The main ethical reasoning of Kant’s deontological ethics is based upon the concepts of duty and goodwill, the intention to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do which should be based on consistent and logical thinking and putting aside our personal interests and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddhism Worksheet

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The goal in the Buddhist teaching is not to aim for happiness but to aim for inner peace, end suffering and liberation from the limitations of the world.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s society teaches people to be happy but in that, they focus on the material items to make them happy. Many people in the world define happiness as living a good life or exceeding the expectations of others. But happiness begins with finding what is within, what is one’s true desires in life. People focus more on the price of life than life itself, and they tend to make happiness out of material objects and then not being happy in the end.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, a positive utilitarian will say we should aim simply to increase the happiness of all those affected by our actions.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Prisoner Doctors

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill says “The utilitarian doctrine is that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being desirable as a means to that end” (Mill, p.425).…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two essential parts to utilitarianism; One, there is some sort of "utility" that is inherently beneficial. Most types of utilitarianism consider this joy. Occasionally it individuals' inclinations being satisfied, paying little respect to what those inclinations are. Two, we should enhance this utility for everybody, not simply ourselves.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brent Strawn, a religion professor, believes that many people in modern day see the pursuit of happiness as “‘[having] to do with ‘seeking it’ or ‘going after it’ somehow.’” However, in the 1700s, the pursuit of happiness was not seen as just practicing how to be happy, but actually obtaining it. Marcus Tullius Cicero once said, “‘What then is freedom? The power to live as one wishes.’” The Founding Fathers believed that everyone had the right to be truly happy not just attempting to be. Happiness was not about self-satisfaction or stupefied pleasure, but more of living life to its full potential; it was a choice. Sadly, in today’s society happiness is not a choice for all. Those in poverty, or facing discrimination in one form or another, do not always have the choice to be happy. Mankind has created such a culture that it is almost impossible to truly be one’s self without being persecuted for it. Moreover, the Founding Fathers viewed Great Britain as denying them the right to choose happiness, once again taking away their “unalienable…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The basic moral principle of utilitarianism is called the principle of utility or the greatest happiness principle. As John Stuart Mill explained it “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism. It focuses on the consequences of action. Utilitarian believe that pleasure or happiness is the good to be produced. As Bentham put it “Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do” Things such as fame, fortune, education, and freedom may be good, but only to the extent that they produce…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong in proportion as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (EMP.123). Utilitarianism accounts for all people and seeks the greatest net happiness. Utilitarianism is unlike egoism, which pursues what is best for one’s self. Utilitarianism also differs from hedonism and epicureanism, which seek to maximize pleasure and avoid pain, respectively. When making a utilitarian decision, intentions are insignificant. The aim is to achieve the greatest good.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thought in utilitarianism is that the ethical worth of an activity is resolved exclusively by its incentive in giving joy or joy as summed among every single cognizant being. It is a type of consequentialism, implying that the ethical worth of any activity is controlled by its result. In this manner the utilitarian saying: the best use for the best number. The biggest supporters of utilitarianism were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between lobbying and bribery is that lobbying is a legal form of actively…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although society always seeks for happiness, it not a feeling that can be forced, rather obtain through good deeds and…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism Vs Hedonism

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As a person, does a person have to suffer in order to know what true happiness is? Does a person have to lack of physical or spiritual things in order to know what real pleasure is? What is pleasure? What is happiness? For hedonism philosophers, the main goal has been to reach a state of form of pleasure, while for utilitarianism philosophers the ultimate goal in life is to find happiness. Both, which seem reasonable goals to live by each day. But what does hedonism and utilitarianism mean, what is happiness, would either approve of Nozick’s Experience Machine in order to achieve happieness or pleasure? In this paper, I will explain how utilitarianism and hedonism works, what are their philosophies and will argue if either one would approve…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays