Han vs. Rome

Good Essays
|Name: David Thai |Date: 6/23/13 |

Graded Assignment

Unit Test, Part 2: Organization and Reorganization of Human Societies, c. 600 B.C.E. to c. 600 C.E.

Complete and submit this assignment by the due date to receive full credit.

|Score |
| |

(45 points)

1. Analyze similarities and differences in methods of political control in TWO of the following empires in the Classical period:

• Han China (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.)

• Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B.C.E.–550 C.E.)

• Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.–476 C.E.)

Answer:

The Roman Empire seems to have upheld monarchy, aristocracy and democracy together in Rome. Rome was divided into two classes, one being the Patricians, which were the small group of aristocratic people and the second being the Plebeians, which were the commoners and everyone else. Rome was an innovator in that they created the first known body of the senate, chosen by the elite class to represent their decisions. The senate was supposed to set policies for the consuls and elect 2 people as chief executives of Rome, one to take care of Rome domestically and make sure that everything as going well inside the empire and the other to conquer new territories and fight wars. Each consul had a one year term check and a senator was not able to serve as consul again after serving for it once before until 10 years later. There was also a position of dictator in Rome when it faced terrible danger and a person would have to step up and take control of the army to face whatever enemy was opposing them. Yet, once Octavian or Caesar Augustus took over, he made the laws and the senate was no longer useful. The emperors were almost always generals because Rome decided to become an empire and conquer new lands so the republic aspect of Rome was shrouded in the hands of one man with most of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roman and Han Empire were different in their political and governmental control through the use of the monarchy and the republic system. The monarchy of the Han Empire was a method of political control because it really strengthened the power of the government to really crackdown on the citizens to make sure that there were no protests or any riots. This control also showed the kinds of beliefs that they had in Han China. Also another type of political control that they used was the filial piety. Filial piety is the respect for your father and elders. This kept the people in check because they had to respect all their elders and the people that were above them. In the Roman Empire the republic method was more based on keeping the society happy then using political authority power. They would hold bread circuses and different events such as the gladiatorial games to keep them happy and prevent riots. The effectiveness of the system in Rome is demonstrated by the explosion of art, giving credit to people that…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Han dynasty and the Roman Empire were bureaucratic. The central rulers all eventually became hereditary and both empires had rulers that oppressed the peasants in order to boost political control. However, the two empires differ in that the emperors had varying justifications for ruling and rose to power in different ways.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    paper

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze the ideas and governmental mechanisms to meet the needs and desires of populations, to regulate territory, to manage conflict, and to establish order and security for the ancient civilizations up to Rome.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collapse of Rome and Han

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many major similarities of the collapse are Rome and the Han empire such as they were both invaded by foreign enemies, the corruption of the governments, and the weak leaders. There are also many differences between the collapse of the Roman and Han empires such as, the Roman empire fell because of Germanic invasions, and the Civil Wars. The Han empire fell because, power was not held by the central government, and uprisings of desperate peasants.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty stressed effectiveness in their tools, as well as using technology to prevent natural disasters and thrive in their society. The Romans, however, marveled at their civilization’s innovations, but rejected idolizing those who worked with tools and crafts.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ch 12 us history

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. In thinking about the similarities and differences among the empires of the early modern era, what categories of comparison might be most useful to consider? Why?…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Islam and A. Compare

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages

    G. Compare and contrast the development of institutions and traditions (political, social, economic, or intellectual) in any two of these classical civilizations:…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2) In thinking about the similarities and differences among the empires of the early modern era, what categories of comparison might be most useful to consider?…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persia and Greece were beautiful and prosperous empires and where the most influential of their time. In this essay I will talk about the two main empires’ political structures and their economy and I will also state similarities and differences between the two empires. The two empires’ political structures might have varied greatly but their economies were very similar. Even though they had differences and had major battles they were still the ideal empires of their time.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Explore the different approaches to imperial rule in Japan, china, and Russia between 1500 and 1800. What sorts of political structures emerged to administer and incorporate the different peoples of these region? what were the infrastructural needs of these empires?…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Methods of political control used in Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) were similar to that of Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) in that both empires sought imperial expansion and the centralization of government. However, these societies greatly differed on their opposition to governing and the techniques used in maintaining control over their citizens.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyze similarities and differences in techniques of imperial administration in TWO of the following empires.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays