Top-Rated Free Essay

Han vs. Rome

Good Essays
Han vs. Rome

The Han dynasty and the Roman empire were both influential empires in the ancient world, but despite their greatness they both reached a point of nonexistence. Both empires had their own problems alike in some ways yet different in others.
The pressures inflicted on Rome and the Han dynasty such as political instability, economic downfall, disease, and natural disasters allowed the decay and eventual collapse of the two classical empires leaving a mark forever on the world as we know it today. In every society there are internal pressures such as political instability and economic downfall. Rome was republic while the Han dynasty was a centralized bureaucracy. Although each empire had a different form of government they both experienced issues with taxes. Taxes were extremely high in both Rome and the Han dynasty. The extremeness of Roman taxes could be attributed to the smaller population. The landowners of the Han dynasty did not have to pay taxes causing extreme taxes among the peasants of the Empire. Towards the end of the Han dynasty it’s once powerful government became weak possibly for huger of power. Roman emperors were overthrown and killed in search of power. Each society also experiences external pressures such as disease and natural disasters. The Han dynasty was greatly affected by natural disasters, while Rome was greatly affected by disease. In 183 CE in Han China natural disasters greatly disturbed the peasants and caused them to revolt. Rome was placed in better area than Han geographically concerning natural disasters. Rome focused on prevention of disease rather than cure of disease. One major focus of the Roman empire was public health. Rome focused on the prevention of disease rather than the cure. This could have caused problems once a disease spread because there were no cures. 
 Every society throughout history has experienced both internal and external pressures that would allow decay and could eventually lead to the collapse. The Roman empire and the Han dynasty both experiences many similar pressures as well as many very different pressures that allowed decay and eventually lead to the collapse of each empire. Each empire left an impact on the world in its rise, prime, and fall.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty declined gradually, mostly due to multiple invasions by foreign people. However, while the Roman Empire showed a decrease in population, Han population rose greatly, leading to two very different outcomes for the ancient civilizations.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rome and han

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a myriad of factors that led to the collapse of classical China and Rome including: different types of political decay, large impersonal forces, and cultural factors.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han Dynasty Causes

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Empire was one of the strongest classical empires. It prevailed long before many others have fallen. The Han has achieved many things but for many reasons did not last. “all great things must come to an end”, and for the Han being such a great empire its reasons were lack of leadership, rebellions or civil wars, unstable religion, and being unable to protect themselves from outsiders.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    No matter where an empire is located, maintaining a vast empire always comes with many hardships, and the Roman and Chinese Empires were no exception. In the time of city-states, the Romans had developed a Republican form of government, which successfully met its needs. However, the Romans failed to develop a new form of government that catered to the demands of an expanding empire, resulting in the fall of the Republic, and Roman emperors were never able to develop an effective ideology of rule. Coupled with armies' loyalties to generals rather than the state, the empire was prone to bloody civil wars and frequent change in rulers who only reigned for several months or years. Also, the empire's obsession with expanding and protecting its borders also led to an increased demand for military service, after which many small farmers had no work, leading to growing populations stuck in poverty and prone to riots. Furthermore, these small farms, which used to produce grain, were replaced, and the empire had to rely on imported grain for sustenance. These events led to the third century crisis, in which the Roman Empire faced a period in which political, military, and economic problems nearly destroyed the empire. China, despite being located in a different hemisphere, faced incredibly similar problems. Both the Roman and Chinese Empires had significant political and social turmoil due to conflicts between independent regions over power. Because it was impossible to communicate any faster than the speed of a horse, empires relied on autonomous local leaders to maintain control. However, many local leaders and military generals being more interested in their own political power, which led to internal conflicts and civil wars. The expanding borders also required greater protection, and both of the administrative centers of these empires were located far from its long borders. In order to maintain and protect its borders, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Eastern Roman Empire, or Byzantine Empire was declared “the New Rome,” and continued on with prosperity for another 1000 years. The fall of the Han Dynasty is similar to the decline of Western Rome, in that they both collapsed due to economic turmoil, political instability, and disobedience towards the government. Both empires also struggled to deal with major problems that came with their success. The Han Dynasty struggled with overpopulation and Western Rome could not manage their overexpansion into conquered…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fall of Rome

    • 2087 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Roman Empire was one that pertains to modern politics, in that, by studying Rome 's trials and struggles, a modern nation might be able to overcome its own problems, perils, and challenges, and use its own opportunities, wisely. Therefore, it only makes sense for people of today to want to ask the question of why Rome fell. Some say that since all states and empires in history have fallen, the real question that should be asked is why Rome lasted for so long. Although it is obvious that states fall, the question asked should be about why Rome fell after such a long period of sustaining an empire. Many historians have decided to look at Rome 's decline due to simultaneous attacks from different groups of barbarians. But, in order to answer the question of why Rome fell after a great period of upholding an empire, the first deeper questions to be answered should be about Rome 's internal crumbling. One of these questions should be about how Rome 's military came to a point at which it was able to be overcome by attacks from barbarians. Other questions should include the state of the economy, politics, and the infrastructure. With the answers to these questions, nations and states of today might be able to overcome an "inevitable" end, like that of Rome. One of Rome 's major problems preceding its decline was the lack of respect for authority, among the people (both civil and military). This basically led to a lot of political chaos, because of all the corruption that was born, and it started to decay the military. Rome 's economy was declining, after a long period of stagnation, especially because of the large-scale hoarding of bullion, which people of Rome started, and because the trade deficit of the eastern regions of the Empire served to stifle the growth of wealth in the west. Therefore, the major reasons for the fall of Rome, although at first glance might seem martial, are truly those that have to do with Rome 's political…

    • 2087 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the fall of the roman empire, it first became divided into the east and the west and was run by several different leaders. I think that the fall of the Roman empire was related to several different issues. Those issues were both internal and external. One of the reasons for the fall of the Roman empire was a decline in morals. People began to not worry so much about standards. They began to be promiscuous, gamble and drink excessive amounts of alcohol. They behaved very inappropriately. Another reason for the fall of the Roman empire was simply the failing economic status. The unemployment rate went up and due to lack of a job, many were faced with receiving hand outs from the government. These are some of the internal factors that…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Ocean Trade

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    decline of some empires such as Rome or China. Disease was a massive problem in the…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Golden Ages

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two important subjects that the Han Dynasty brought for us were the plowing tools and the watermill. Once plowing was perfected, it helped with rudder and shipbuilding. The watermill was used to grind grains, and therefore have a better food supply. The Han Dynasty also had the first roads, canals, and bridges. Another, achievement was bringing back of the civil service exam. The major reasons why this empire collapsed were because rich people took over poor ones, people got greedy and selfish, it became too big so controlling it was very difficult. Other reasons include large land owners didn't have to pay tax, there wasn't any royalty for emperors, and roads were not cared for.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E.- 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. - 476 C.E.) were each amazing civilizations in their own ways. Each dynasty made many great ecological and technological advancements. Additionally, the governments of these civilizations each had ways of maintaining the political control over their subjects. The Han Dynasty of China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control were similar in many ways (including their use of centralized governments and their uses of their military) and many differences (including the roles of citizens in the government and the governments techniques for keeping the lower classes happy) but I believe the similarities outweigh the differences because while the differences are definite ways to control the people, the similarities listed have been much more long-lasting and are also much more essential to this type of control.…

    • 775 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decline of the Roman and Han empires was caused by a number of events such as social unrest, problems with the government, and a decline in military which made them vulnerable to any number of events that could occur. The Han dynasty over time regrew into various forms, while the downfall of the Roman Empire was never followed by the regrowth of the Roman civilization.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han Empires

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From about 30 B.C.E to the 200’s A.C.E the Roman and the Han Empire’s fell. The Roman Empire had 2 centuries of Pax Romana (Peace in Rome) that ended with the death of Marcus Aurelius and started the decline and fall of the empire. In the Han Empire Liu Bang ruled the Empire very peacefully and restores unity to China, Bang established a centralized government, lowered taxes and softened punishments. Following Bang’s death Wudi ruled the Han empire and was known as the Martial Emperor because he wanted to expand China through wars, both Wudi and Bang were very successful leaders but after the death of Wudi china experienced many bad rulers and thus starting the fall of the Han Empire. Internal and external factors led to the decline and fall of classical empires like the Romans and the Han.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roman and Han Empire were different in their political and governmental control through the use of the monarchy and the republic system. The monarchy of the Han Empire was a method of political control because it really strengthened the power of the government to really crackdown on the citizens to make sure that there were no protests or any riots. This control also showed the kinds of beliefs that they had in Han China. Also another type of political control that they used was the filial piety. Filial piety is the respect for your father and elders. This kept the people in check because they had to respect all their elders and the people that were above them. In the Roman Empire the republic method was more based on keeping the society happy then using political authority power. They would hold bread circuses and different events such as the gladiatorial games to keep them happy and prevent riots. The effectiveness of the system in Rome is demonstrated by the explosion of art, giving credit to people that…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays