"No place indeed should murder sanctuarize; revenge should have no bounds." (iv, vii, 128-129). Revenge comes from intense hatred, anger and determination. Hamlet, the tragedy of the "melancholy" Dane was written by more than four hundred years ago by English playwright William Shakespeare, never seems to slow down, much less to stop and rest. The play itself demonstrates explicitly the dark side of human nature: dishonesty, betrayal, scheming, spying, abuse, aggression, and war. Revenge, being one of the important themes, plays a crucial role in the book. Throughout the years critics have fiercely disputed Hamlet 's indecision about avenge his father 's murder. What makes him too slow to respond to his revengeful will? In this essay, this will be addressed. Some original views will be offered and based on these ideas; a possible understanding of Hamlet 's delay will be suggested. First of all, in the book reading on Hamlet, noted Shakespearean experts Louis B. Wright and Virginia A. LaMar of the Folger Shakespeare Library believe that "Hamlet, possessed of a finely trained intellect, is a man with a philosophic approach to life. He has been at the University of Wittenberg, where he has engaged in the subtleties of intellectual speculation. By training, such a man learns to analyze problems, and his responses are never automatic because his decisions come after contemplation rather than impulse." They further point out that, "If Hamlet 's methods of working out his problems are indirect and time-consuming; he is merely following the pattern of behavior of the thoughtful and speculative type of thinker." They are trying to explain that Hamlet is a well organized and calculating person who is seeking and waiting for the best moment for his revenge, they strongly affirm that this is the main reason for Hamlet 's manner of postponing his father 's revenge. We can see how manipulative he is in act iii scene ii
Bibliography: 1. Nardo, Don. Readings on Hamlet. San Diego: David L. Bender, 1999. 2. Nardo, Don. Understanding Hamlet. San Diego: Lucent Books, 2001. 3. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Toronto: Marilyn Eisenstat, 1988. 4. Hattaway, Michael. An introduction to the variety of critism of Hamlet. New Jersey: Michael Scott, 1987.