From his initial introduction, Horatio demonstrates that he is an intelligent man that discerns many situations with extreme caution. After meeting the Ghost, Horatio states “This bodes some strange eruption to our state” (1.1.80). This statement suggests that Horatio is fully aware to what degree the news will affect his friend who is still mourning the loss of his father. He shows intuition to what consequences lay ahead for an emotionally confused Hamlet as well as how his actions will affect the state of Denmark royalty. He is subtly foreshadowing bad outcomes for all in the play, not only Hamlet.
During Hamlet’s meeting with the Ghost, while the Ghost is beckoning him to follow it, Horatio asserts himself over the prince by stating “Do not, my lord,” (1.4.71). This suggests a much more familiar relationship between the two friends than that of Hamlets other friends, who seem to be merely situational, having been schoolmates in addition to their service to Claudius. If Horatio can command a prince in this way, then we know it is out of love for his friend and fear in his wisdom:
Horatio-
And what if tempt you toward the flood, my lord?
Or some dreadful summit of the cliff
That beetles o’er his base into the sea,
And there assume some other horrible form
Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason
And draw you into madness ? Think of it
[That very place puts toys of depression,
Without more motive, into every brain
That looks so many fathoms to the sea
And hears a roar beneath.]” (1.4.77-86) In this passage we can see Horatio more directly foreshadowing events to follow in the play. It is only through this apparition that Hamlet then descends into his own feigned and methodical madness, and produces actions which then affect all of the characters’ responses. Ophelia’s suicide and Laertes’ desire for revenge are both directly related to Hamlet’s hasty actions during the buildup of this play. In re-reading the above passage after the play’s tragic conclusion, we are made acutely aware of how correct Horatio was. During Act 4, Horatio’s lines are few but it to Horatio that Hamlet sends correspondence, alerting him of his location. Hamlet trusted Horatio enough to bring him into a plot for his return to Denmark and Horatio obliges with unfettered dedication, “Come, I will (give) you way for these letters/And do’t the speedier that you may direct me/To him from who you brought them,” (4.5.32-24.) Horatio is undaunted by a potential plot against the king’s wishes and shows concern only for his friend who he will now be attending to. Horatio is undoubtedly loyal to Hamlet but possesses a very bold deference to his royalty. Conversely, Hamlet never vocally protests to a subject offering him unsolicited advice when it would be well within his princely authority to do so. Observing this further mirrors the mutual love and respect that they have for each other. When Oseric enters to pass the message of a dual between Laertes and Hamlet, Horatio tells Hamlet “You will lose, my lord,” (5.2.223). This warning is promptly ignored by Hamlet but we can observe much more of Horatio’s wisdom in that statement. Horatio does not say “You will lose the duel, my lord.” He simply means that, given the plot against Hamlet, it will not matter how skilled with a sword he is, Hamlet will be no match for the cunning of those plotting against him. No matter the outcome of the duel, Hamlet will suffer the ultimate loss. He further cautions Hamlet “If your mind dislike anything, obey it,” (5.2.231). It is in the final scene of Shakespeare’s Hamlet that we see how much Horatio and Hamlet mean to one another. Hamlet does not die in a woman’s arms but rather the arms of his best and closest friend in the world. Hamlet entrusts his final words to Horatio to pass on his final wishes to the respected King Fortinbras. Horatio’s love for his friend is carried so far that even Horatio attempts to drink poison and end his life, mourning the imminent death of his friend saying “Here’s yet some liquor left,” (5.2.375) but is abruptly stopped by Hamlet and instructed to “Tell my story,” (5.2.384). By surviving, Horatio is able to unfold the plot against Hamlet to an audience and explain the treachery against him. Horatio is the most qualified to do this because of his utter devotion to Hamlet throughout the course of the play. He never falters in his mission to obey Hamlet’s commands not as a subject but rather as a friend. Horatio’s character legitimizes Hamlet is every aspect of the play. His appearances may seem inconsequential at first glance but his role in developing Hamlet is paramount. Horatio does not suspect Hamlet is mad but is aware of what events brought him to the variety of mental states he finds himself in. Horatio had seen the Ghost, proving to the audience that Hamlet is not alone in these apparitions and therefore not as ‘mad’ as he may be letting on. Horatio’s continual cautioning to Hamlet shows him to be wise and of impeccable credibility as we can see that had Hamlet followed Horatio’s cautioning, he may not have come to such a tragic end. By his love, dedication, honesty, and intelligence, Horatio is able to posses the wits that Hamlet may not in his time of extreme strife and is one of the most crucial character’s to justifying Hamlet’s end as tragic and heroic. Without Horatio there would be no Hamlet, only a mad prince suffering under those plotting against him. Their bond remains un-tainted throughout the duration of the play but Hamlet’s refusal of his good friends advice left him dead, however symbolic his death may have needed to be. And with his death, a best friend and confidant’s final goodbye is felt with great suffering: “Now cracks a noble heart. Goodnight, sweet prince, /And flights of Angles sing thee to thy rest.” (5.2.397-398)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
He has been told to avenge his father, and yet, this man is unable to do so. Hamlet has been unable to devise a plan in which he can trap Claudius and exact the revenge required by the phantom King Hamlet. He, Hamlet, a prince and son to a dead, disgraced father cannot sum up the energy to exact revenge, but a mere common player can stand before a group and blanch, weep, and go hoarse all for the sake of entertainment. Hamlet thinks it “monstrous” that this is so.…
- 734 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has remained the most perplexing, as well as the most popular, of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. Whether considered as literature, philosophy, or drama, its artistic stature is universally admitted. To explain the reasons for its excellence in a few words, however, is a daunting task. Apart from the matchless artistry of its language, the play’s appeal rests in large measure on the character of Hamlet himself. Called upon to avenge his father’s murder, he is compelled to face problems of duty, morality, and ethics that have been human concerns through the ages. The play has tantalized critics with what has become known as the Hamlet mystery, that of Hamlet’s complex behavior, most notably his indecision and his reluctance to act.…
- 1773 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare is one of the most compelling and influential tragedies in English literature. The tragedy is rife with death, vengeance, and puissant soliloquies that are highly interpretable by the audience. Hamlet discovers his father’s unnatural death was a heinous plot by his uncle to steal the crown and the queen. Throughout the play, in Hamlet’s soliloquies, he reveals himself to be a righteous individual who will execute what he believes in: justice.…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Detail 1: To begin with, Prince Hamlet in “Hamlet” is considered to be a scholar, a thinker, and the kind of person who would not act without thoroughly analysing the circumstances. Hamlet’s flaws as a central character become evident when the intrigue begins to take shape. The intrigue in “Hamlet” shows Hamlet’s father coming to him, as a ghost, and pleads revenge for his death. Hamlet becomes aware that his uncle, Claudius,…
- 1618 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare’s play Hamlet (1601) explores Hamlet’s growing insecurities and uncertainties, which stem from his attempt to find certainty and order within his changing transitioning society. Hamlet’s strong moral code and genuine grief at the beginning of the play contrasts with his descent into madness and deceit, as the corruption of the court begin to deteriorate his integrity and eventually lead to his tragic downfall. Throughout the play Shakespeare explores universal notions of authenticity contrasted with duplicity, the struggle between action and inaction and challenging the archetypal tragedian. Through an exploration of these themes, Shakespeare attempts to use the characters in his play to reflect his view on humanity and the shifting, conflicting paradigms between Medieval and Renaissance thinking.…
- 1175 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The apparition of the late Hamlet informs his son that Claudius, the current king of Denmark, poisoned him. Upon hearing the news, Hamlet is enraged and swears to take revenge against his usurping uncle. Almost immediately he is ready to lay down his life to correct what has been done, and he now has a “…willingness to throw all he has into the contest, the battle to secure his rightful place in his world” (3). It is at this moment in the play that Hamlet takes on the role of the familiar tragic hero and acts accordingly. He was displaced from the life that he knew and loved and was not awarded with his rightful position in society. Hamlet should be the king of Denmark if what the ghost told him is true; not only is Hamlet not the king of Denmark, but also his mental health is constantly being called into question. He is losing ranks in society awfully quickly, and part of Arthur Miller’s…
- 784 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
He possesses a level of knowledge demonstrated throughout the play, while advising Shakespeare on what he believes he should do or not do. The first sign of this is when Horatio and Hamlet encounter the ghost of King Hamlet. "Why, what should be the fear? I do not set my life at a pin 's fee, and for my soul, what can it do to that"? (Shakespeare 653) Hamlet has already made up his mind about following the ghost, and finding out what it wants. Horatio pleads for Hamlet not to go, but he doesn 't listen anyway. Although Horatio couldn 't sway Hamlet from following the ghost, at least he was concerned and made Hamlet take the time to think about it…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When Horatio was first told about the appearance of the apparition, he was skeptical, " Horatio says 'tis but our fantasy And will not let belief take hold of him" ( 1.1.29). When the ghost was first sighted in the play, Bernardo remarks that the ghost looks similar to the King Hamlet, and Marcellus reasons with Horatio that he should address the ghost. This usage of the word " thou" causes the ghost to exit. Marcellus comments that the ghost was offended, meaning that by Horatio speaking to the ghost of the King with such lack of respect and with demands the ghost left.…
- 2070 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Shakespeare’s tragic play titled “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” (commonly shortened to “Hamlet”) is a well-known classic. The story follows a complex protagonist named Hamlet who faces a challenge that would end up changing his life. He is given the ultimatum to avenge his father’s death or to simply let it be. Hamlet is a character that appears to be insane, but in reality, he has reasons for his actions. Although he seems mad, he only acts this way in front of certain people. He knows it is what he has to do to avenge his father’s death by killing his father’s murderer. During the story, the ghost of Hamlet’s father appears and tells him the truth about how he died. He explains to his young son that he was murdered by King Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle. Hamlet is commanded by the ghost to seek revenge on Claudius and regain order to Denmark. The prince of Denmark is eager to get his vengeance on his father’s murderer when he first hears the news, but he contemplates what he should do because he knows his actions would not be moral. Eventually, he decides to get his revenge and kill the king because it is what his father wished him to do.…
- 1397 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet strips away the veneers and smoke screens that trap our minds, forcing us to confront the raw human condition in all its pain and glory. For this reason, Hamlet has never ceased to enthral audiences since its conception, and has been critically scrutinized for centuries. Shakespeare explores ideas that are universally understood: the human need for vengeance, human glory as well as human failings, and the unavoidable presence of death. Collectively, these ideas compose a deep probing of the human condition. On a personal level, Hamlet has been worthy of my interpretive study because it has provoked me to engage with my surroundings more critically, questioning established values, norms and codes of behaviour that had previously held my conviction.…
- 1307 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Throughout William Shakespeare's play, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark is set on his goal of achieving vengeance and justice for his father’s murder, without the realization that his obstinate aspirations eventually lead to his own downfall. Unlike many other characters, Hamlet is very analytical; he makes very calculated and thoughtful moves before he acts, ultimately leading him to his death. "Hamlet represents the type of man whose power of direct action is paralyzed by an excessive development of his intellect" (Freud, Sigmund). This is furthermore supported when Hamlet is given a golden opportunity to attain vengeance for his father, but does not kill Claudius, the king of Denmark, for Hamlet mistakenly assumes that Claudius is praying.…
- 2218 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Writing is largely the product of an author’s desire to say something, to tell a story, or to simply entertain an audience; but it is also a product of the time in history in which it was written, and thus shaped by the standards, expectations, attitudes, limitations, and events of the day. One could read Hamlet merely as a revenge tragedy: Hamlet’s father, the king of Denmark, is killed by his brother, Claudius, who, as a result, arrogates not only the crown, but also his departed brother’s wife, Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude. The ghost of the deceased king reveals the circumstances of his death to his son, leaving Hamlet with a sense of obligation to avenge the murder, the usurpation, and the adultery. In the end, Hamlet does exact revenge by killing Claudius. This leads many to view Hamlet primarily as a revenge tragedy, but it is actually more enlightening as a topical history; in fact, J. Dover Wilson, a scholar of Renaissance drama, particularly on the work of William Shakespeare, regards Hamlet as “the most topical play in the whole corpus” (Rowse 188).…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, William Shakespeare’s longest, and perhaps most notable, play explores several important aspects of the human condition. Hamlet’s battle between his emotions and logic, as well as his fatal flaws and what he considers to be morally good and looming evil, encased in a story of murder and betrayal enlightens audiences to contemplate the true meaning of being human. Ultimately, through Hamlet’s questioning of humanity and what it means to be alive and human, Shakespeare prompts the conversation in his audience.…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
We are first introduced to Horatio when Marcellus and Barnardo, the night guards, ask him to confirm their sighting of a ghost and to speak to it, because he “art a scholar” (I.i.51) Horatio faces the ghost and questions it without hesitance or fear, yelling to it, “Stay, speak, speak, I charge thee speak!” (I.i.63) Amanda Mabillard mentions that Horatio is a “calm, resolute, and rational character,” which is “why Hamlet chooses Horatio to become the sole person on whom he can rely.” After Horatio recovers from the initial shock of seeing the ghostly apparition of King Hamlet, one of his first thoughts is that they should tell Prince Hamlet because it is “needful in [their] loves” and “fitting [of their] duty” (I.i.190). When Horatio informs Hamlet that they saw his father’s ghost, Hamlet immediately believes the bizarre tale without a doubt, which further illustrates his deep trust in Horatio. Hamlet interrogates the three of them about specific details, and they decide to meet late that night during watch duty to try to see the ghost again.…
- 1763 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
In Act 1:1 of Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ the audience is shown the ghost of the dead King Hamlet and the genre of a revenge tragedy is introduced. The scene is set in the night which immediately creates a sense of mystery, intrigue and apprehension, linking to the feelings created by the idea of ghosts and the supernatural which were typical of Elizabethan revenge tragedy playwrights. Shakespeare also uses various language techniques to create this mood in this scene. The scene begins with the guard Bernardo asking the question ‘Who’s there?’ creating a tense mood of uncertainty. Half lines are also used by Shakespeare to create a broken rhythm in the conversation, increasing the feelings of insecurity and unease as the text does not flow. The discussion about the Ghost is full of contrasts and tensions showing the uncertainty felt by the characters. Marcellus states ‘Horatio says tis but our fantasy/ And will not let belief take hold of him’, showing the audience that Horatio is sceptical towards the existence of the supernatural. We see that Horatio is an educated, rational character as Marcellus seems to respect and depend on his opinion for deciding on the existence of the ghost. This loyalty in Horatio’s opinion juxtaposes with the treacherous news that Hamlet is about to receive regarding his father’s murder by Claudius. As Horatio is an educated character, his part-acceptance of the Ghost’s existence could persuade the audience to believe in the Ghost as well, as Horatio’s testimony is far more convincing than what the superstitious watchmen say. Marcellus goes on to call the Ghost ‘majestical’ but Horatio says that it acted ‘like a guilty thing’. This indicates that there’s confusion over the Ghost’s intentions and origin from the start. The Ghost also foreshadows the tragedy to come. Horatio wonders if it ‘bodes some strange relation to the eruption to our state’ and suspects the Ghost may have some supernatural knowledge of the ‘country’s fate’ which…
- 4978 Words
- 20 Pages
Better Essays