Preview

Hamlet's Motive

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hamlet's Motive
Hamlet has long-been associated with the name of William Shakespeare as a masterful work of literary art. It is one of the most debated, celebrated and studied pieces of all time; a marvel of showmanship from one of the most famous authors to ever pick up the elegant pen of words. Those who have read the drama often marvel at the complexity of Hamlet himself, and debate his hesitancy of action throughout the tragedy—namely, the supposed murder of Claudius which he ‘must’ commit. While many scholars agree on Hamlet’s reasons for delay, critics have yet to narrow their thoughts on Hamlet’s overlying motive: why does behave the way he does? More importantly, what were Shakespeare’s motives in portraying Hamlet the way he ultimately does? Hamlet’s hesitation is not the most convoluted and interesting of the subjects; his rationale of purpose is what drives the entire work to be the complex enigma that it still is, to this day. To begin with, many scholars have suggested that Hamlet’s motives directly correlate to Shakespeare’s own life and experiences. With such an intricate work of literature, it is easily assumed that “anything which will give us the key to the inner meaning of Hamlet will necessarily provide a clue to much of the deeper workings of Shakespeare’s mind” (Jones 25). While this may be true, one cannot necessarily assume that unlocking Hamlet’s motives and frame of mind will bring us closer to William Shakespeare, as a person and personality. Rather, it is safe to say that in exploring Hamlet’s intentions, one can find insight into the mentality of Shakespeare; the ideas which he molded into the character of Hamlet, in order to build the persona which he used to explore the subject of revenge. Like with many great works, a reader cannot always assume that the main character is modeled after the author who penned it. This is a biased way to look at literature, and often detracts from the piece as a whole. One should only take that the ideas portrayed in


Cited: Bradby, C.F. The Problems of Hamlet. New York: Princeton University Press, 1928. Foss, George R. What the Author Meant. London: Random House. 1932. Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1949. Mauerhof. Ueber Hamlet. Trans. Harvard College Library. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard College Library, 1907. Deuticke, 1911. Wolff, Gustav. Der Fall Hamlet. Trans. Meuchen. Germany: Barth, 1914.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has remained the most perplexing, as well as the most popular, of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. Whether considered as literature, philosophy, or drama, its artistic stature is universally admitted. To explain the reasons for its excellence in a few words, however, is a daunting task. Apart from the matchless artistry of its language, the play’s appeal rests in large measure on the character of Hamlet himself. Called upon to avenge his father’s murder, he is compelled to face problems of duty, morality, and ethics that have been human concerns through the ages. The play has tantalized critics with what has become known as the Hamlet mystery, that of Hamlet’s complex behavior, most notably his indecision and his reluctance to act.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mind and Hamlet

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare’s texts have been re-visited, re-interpreted and re-invented to suit the context and preferences of an evolving audience, and it through this constant recreation it is evident that Hamlet “does not define or exhaust its possibilities”. Through the creation of a character who emulates a variety of different themes, such as revenge, realisation of reality and the questioning of humanity, we can see the different possibilities within Hamlet as an “admirable text” with enduring human value. Furthermore, the emotional journey of Hamlet and his progression of madness provide further opportunity for differing interpretations. Hamlet connects with audiences from a variety of socio-historic contexts primarily due to its address of fundamental human issues and what it is to be human.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Hamlet explores humanities complex processes and the condition of which we live. In this play, the concept of revenge is studied cohesively with the ability of humans to make judgments over their actions and human’s curiosity toward seeking answers. Shakespeare, having written this play in the 17th century, creates the protagonist Hamlet as a forward thinking character with a philosophical quality and moral understanding regarding his ability to reason. These traits conflict against the crude revenge task at hand in the play. Through Hamlet’s complexity, Shakespeare makes direct opinions about the human condition and what it is to be human.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any critical evaluation of the play “Hamlet” must be chiefly concerned with the character of Hamlet. Unlike Shakespeare’s other tragedies, “Hamlet” is singular in purpose and scope-it is the story of one man’s personal and moral collapse under the weight of his own (and other’s) decisions, intentions and machinations. The play is not complicated with subplots and extraneous secondary characters, but is wholly focused on the man himself. This dedication to a singular dramatic intention paradoxically makes for “Hamlet” to be, subjectively, Shakespeare most confusing play. It is problematic in its protagonists’ inscrutability, his missing motives, his contradictory actions, and his utter implacability to settle into one stable character. Almost everything he does further contradicts him as an individual in the world of the play and as a dramatic character. For this reason my critical evaluation of the play is that it is artistically self defeating due to its own subversions of character and dramatic convention, and this should render it unfulfilling and disappointing as a dramatic performance. Paradoxically, the plays confusion renders it all the more infuriatingly readable-it is both alienating and enticing, a work which defeats itself in its own realisation and at the same time is only worthwhile and meaningful in this artistic enigma-the individual components should not work, yet it does strike a powerful emotional and dramatic resonance in its completion. Many aspects of “Hamlet” as a text are easily criticised-it is certainly a work with a large amount of problems. However, in a rather subversive and mysterious manner the play is a wonderful work of literature.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare Major Paper

    • 2842 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Hamlet himself is a difficult character to figure out. With his elegant intensity and reckless but cautious attitude, he is able to keep his readers entertained as the play progresses. Through his irrational decisions, emotional madness and admirable qualities, Hamlet becomes a character with whom readers will continuously empathize. Our first impression of Hamlet sets the tone for the entire play. We are brought to one of the beginning scenes where Hamlet is…

    • 2842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many readers, hamlet remains an imaginative work which has been called a “great poetical puzzle”. Hamlet has caused more discussion than any other character in fiction, dramatic or non-dramatic. Many have been disturbed by what have been called: the two Hamlet in the play”. 1- The true sensitive young intellectual and idealist; the sweet prince, who expresses himself in unforgettable poetry. 2- The other, a barbaric who treats Ophelia cruelty and kills Polonius. Hamlet, a tragic hero who has a clear and sacred obligation to kill Claudius and to do so without delay; the basic question then is: why does so much time elapse before revenge?…

    • 10144 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare's play, Hamlet, documents one character's continual development. From a hesitant youth to a ruthless revenge-seeker, there are three major turning points that propose the start of Hamlet's wicked evolution. In dealing with his father's passing, Hamlet's grief burdens him to be overwrought with emotion and causes him to contemplate the irrational, even murder. The Players' scene, Prayer scene and Closet scene all present possible key turning points for this change. Although Hamlet's sanity remains questionable throughout the play, these three scenes suggest possible points in which Hamlet becomes particularly vicious. Beginning with the vision of his father's ghost relaying the notion of his own murder by Hamlet's uncle, Claudius, Hamlet's mind becomes increasingly flooded with impulsions.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juxtaposition In Hamlet

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    William Shakespeare, regarded as one of the greatest English playwrights of all time, crafted Hamlet, a masterpiece that unravels a corrupt royal family. As the play opens with the death of the Denmark king, the audience is thrown into a world of power and betrayal. Prince Hamlet’s discovery of his father’s murder sets the stage for a creative and engaging story delving into the intricacies of revenge. In Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses the motif of revenge to convey the complexities of human nature rooted in internal conflicts, demonstrating the dangers of revenge. Hamlet’s journey for revenge leads him down an emotionally and internally difficult path swamped in moral dilemmas as he faces the consequences of revenge and the inevitability…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it not monstrous that this player here, but in a fiction, in a dream of passion, could force his soul so to his own conceit” (2.2. 577-580). Hamlet admires these players because they can act, something which Hamlet cannot do. He fails to exact the revenge that is his supposed purpose until the end of the play. As he watches the players, he wonders why he does not have the same passion that fuels actions. Perhaps because Hamlet is not filled with the desire for revenge after the death of his father, perhaps because he does not think murder is the answer.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet 's self-description in his apology to Laertes, delivered in the appropriately distanced and divided third-person, explicitly fingers the greatest antagonist of the play‹consciousness. The obligatory cultural baggage that comes along with Hamlet heeds little attention to the incestuous Claudius while focusing entirely on the gloomy Dane 's legendary melancholia and his resulting revenge delays. As Laurence Olivier introduced his 1948 film version, "This is the tragedy of a man who couldn 't make up his mind." By tracking the leitmotif of "thought" throughout the play, I will examine the conflicts that preclude Hamlet from unified decisions that lead to action. Shakespeare is not content, however, with the simple notion of thought as a mere signifier of the battle between the mind and the body. The real clash is a conflict of consciousness, of Hamlet 's oscillations between infinite abstraction and shackled solipsism, between recognition of the heroic ideal and of his limited means, between the methodical mishmash of sanity and the total chaos of insanity. I repeat "between" not only for anaphoric effect, but to suggest Shakespeare 's conception of thought; that is, a set of perspectivally-splintered realities which can be resolutely conflated, for better or worse, only by the mediating hand of action. Any discussion of Hamlet, a work steeped in contradictions and doubles, necessitates inquiry into passages concerning opposition to thought, namely those of the corporeal. And, as Shakespeare engages the imagination of his audience primarily through metaphor, I will use "thought" as a catapult to critique sections that are relevant to my argument.…

    • 4393 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Writing is largely the product of an author’s desire to say something, to tell a story, or to simply entertain an audience; but it is also a product of the time in history in which it was written, and thus shaped by the standards, expectations, attitudes, limitations, and events of the day. One could read Hamlet merely as a revenge tragedy: Hamlet’s father, the king of Denmark, is killed by his brother, Claudius, who, as a result, arrogates not only the crown, but also his departed brother’s wife, Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude. The ghost of the deceased king reveals the circumstances of his death to his son, leaving Hamlet with a sense of obligation to avenge the murder, the usurpation, and the adultery. In the end, Hamlet does exact revenge by killing Claudius. This leads many to view Hamlet primarily as a revenge tragedy, but it is actually more enlightening as a topical history; in fact, J. Dover Wilson, a scholar of Renaissance drama, particularly on the work of William Shakespeare, regards Hamlet as “the most topical play in the whole corpus” (Rowse 188).…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet is generally regarded as Shakespeare’s magnum opus, sometimes it is even referred as the highest literary product of human genius. Critics have always been argued on the interpretation of Hamlet and even after more than 400 years, yet these argues still going strong. One of the most controversial that topic for critics since the beginning is the interpretation of the third act of Hamlet, where many critics themselves baffle because normal interpretations will make Hamlet subsequent actions irrational and impossible to explain. Many will use insanity to explain Hamlet actions. However, we will presume that Hamlet is staying sane throughout the course of the story. This paper is an attempt at interpreting the purpose and significant of…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy Hamlet was composed in the early 17th century Elizabethan Era, reflecting this society’s preoccupation with retribution and vengeance. It explores key concerns and concepts of everlasting relevance to audiences of all ages. The tragic hero Hamlet is intensely human and his struggles are familiar to all audiences. He educates the audience via vicarious learning, sharing his experiences as he explores fundamental issues of morality and mortality through his intense interactions with the lead female characters. Key concerns that are the driving forces in Hamlet include: deception and revenge. These overarching concerns help the audience to understand the prevarications and motivations of Hamlet, along with the multifaceted relationships between Hamlet, Ophelia, Gertrude and Claudius.…

    • 726 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the murderer of his father is revealed, Hamlet acts slowly and precisely whilst attempting to ascertain the truth behind Claudius and his father’s “most unnatural murder”. In act 3 scene 3 Hamlet refrains from killing Claudius because the king is praying, and “so a goes to heaven” highlighting Hamlet’s conflicted internal psyche regarding his beliefs in Christian conduct or divine judgment and personal responsibility, reflecting the prevailing Elizabethan tension between the philosophy of Humanism and the Christian beliefs in divine providence. Indeed Al Bradley’s contention that “The protagonist’s downfall can be reduced to a single flaw” fails to take account of the conflicting contextual factors with which Hamlet is faced. More compelling is Al Swin Barne’s assertion that “single inner most Hamlet’s is not… hesitation but rather the strong conflux of contending forces.” Whilst an Elizabethan audience would agree with Hamlet’s plan to avenge his father, as revenge was considered a positive act of retribution, a contemporary audience empathises with Hamlet’s struggle to reconcile his conflicting beliefs and therefore understands his hesitation to murder Claudius. Additionally, in Hamlet’s soliloquy in act 4 scene 4 he reveals his focus on contemplation rather than action as he states “Oh from this time forth, /My thoughts be bloody or nothing worth” highlighting his fixation on his contemplative and conflicted thoughts rather than significant action, acting as a cause of his delay. Furthermore, through Hamlet’s contention that “the king is a thing…/Of nothing” the ideas of the Elizabethan Chain of Being and divine providence is subverted and essentially reflects Existential concerns in which an individual’s maintains the personal responsibility to dictate…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet and Horatio

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Shakespeare’s Hamlet offers the audience a glimpse into a royal world of deception, madness, and personal greed. Aside from those most obviously deceivers such as Claudius and Polonius, nearly every character in the play can be viewed as having ulterior motives if the viewer asks the right questions. Does Hamlet truly wish to avenge his father or secure a place as king of Denmark? Is Gertrude a whimsical mother or a ‘Black Widow’ queen? Even the Ghost of Hamlet’s father may possibly be a demon sent to tempt Hamlet into vengeance and murder as we have discussed in class. However, one character remains consistently pure in nearly all of his actions throughout the play. Horatio, the best friend and confidant to Hamlet, is the reason that Hamlet may be regarded as the tragic hero. If it were not for Horatio, Hamlet would not have a voice to mourn his death or pass his wishes for the betterment of Denmark to the next throne. Had Hamlet heeded the multiple cautions from Horatio, he may have been able to avoid his tragic demise.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics