Preview

Gun Control Wont Affect Murder Rates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
111 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Wont Affect Murder Rates
Gun control wont affect murder rates. study's have shown if they ban guns or get stricter gun control laws they will use other weapons to substitute guns. Russia, for example has extremely tight gun control laws. Its murder rate is still quite high in fact its twice as high as our gun ridden United states. So there for banning guns wont get rid of murder. A study revealed that most of the European countries such as Norway, France, Germany, and Finland has significantly lower murder rates. Compare that to Luxembourg where handguns are totally banned and any type of gun is minimal has a murder rate nine time higher than Germany.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control would not help crime or murder rates because instead it disarms the law abiding citizens, therefore putting them at a disadvantage in defending there selves against criminals. The second amendment states that citizens have the right to bear arms. Guns have also been an American sporting tradition for years, and have saved many lives from rapist, murders and innocent civilians from the hands of criminals.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This leads me to believe that there would be less violence with stricter gun laws . These laws would include extensive background checks on the people who buy the guns, longer waiting periods, and mental health evaluations to ensure guns stay out of the wrong hands. Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.Gun control laws don't deter crimes, gun ownership deters crime. In the twentieth-century weapon, ownership had doubled but the murder rate has decreased. Anyone can go buy a gun but that doesn't mean they're going to use…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I. Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Newtown are just a few places where mass shootings have happened that have left people forever scarred and unable to forget. Because of these and other incidents, the gun control topic has been in the spotlight. There is no question that guns are a contributor to crimes and murders. However, does restricting and putting limitations on them really help control crime and murders or will this be taking legitimate…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    No amount of laws will ever change that. This is proven by the fact that in Singapore possession of drugs is punishable by death, yet there is still drug trafficking. This also pertains to guns. Fatalities during crimes will still occur. The crime rate will not decrease. In Virginia you have to register to purchase a gun, and the rate of crimes has stayed the same. Many people die in crimes, but there are more fatalities from everyday items, such as hammers or ice picks, than there are gun fatalities. Gun control is not the solution we need to stop crime. It is inadequate and frustrating to many people. If gun control became a reality, there would be riots and uprisings all over the United States. If there were gun control laws, the riots and uprisings would increase fatalities from guns.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws Essay

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With stricter gun laws such as universal background checks, the deaths across America can decrease immensely. Background checks look for convicted felons, substance abusers, and certain misdemeanors. Background checks also include those of who were involuntarily committed to a mental institution. Once a convicted felon your gun rights are stripped and you can never own a gun again unless your civil rights are restored to you by the state. However, there is plenty of room for error for those who are substance abusers or mentally unstable. Each state varies on how their background check system works, some have highly automated systems while others still use paper records. As well as different background check systems states also have different regulations about how mentally unstable are documented in their computer system. With these two differences among states this allows for a vast majority of substance abusers and mentally unstable people to slip through the background check when they should have easily been found if it were for stricter gun laws. Studies showed that states with more gun laws have forty-two percent less crime than states who are more lenient. With stricter gun laws and a universal background system it doesn’t strip away the rights of the Second amendment though it enforces who should have a gun and who should not. Therefore, if America can enforce stricter gun laws and a universal background system deaths across America will reduce…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe gun control laws do not stop gun violence because of the killing population. If the gun control laws stop the violence the death crime wouldn’t be so high. Criminals don't seem to care about the laws. Criminals continue to carry guns looking for trouble.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groups such as the NRA argue that gun control does little to actually deter crime, therefore, why limit the right of law abiding citizens. A November 2013 study found that, between 1980 and 2009, "assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level," Likewise, "states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders" (M. Guis, 2013). The goal of gun control should be results, not merely implementing policy for the sake of policy. Additional studies show that states with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes. Likewise, when states pass the right to carry concealed gun laws, deaths from mass shootings plummeted on average by 90 percent (Lott, 1998). Interestingly, as the amount of firearms in a population increases the amount of crime correspondingly…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year, over 500,000 crimes are committed using a firearm (Kleck 1). More than 100,000 people are shot every year, amounting to an average of 289 people per day. Of those shot each day, 86 of them die, 30 of them being murdered (Djansezian). Looking at gun violence in this light makes it very understandable why support of stricter gun control has increased drastically in the recent past. A 2015 Gallup poll found that 55% of Americans say we should have stricter gun laws, up a significant 8% from 2014. Ideally, intensifying gun control laws would keep the weapons out of the hands of criminals or other people that would use the weapons illegally. However, would creating stricter gun laws actually decrease violence in the United States? There…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we enacted more gun control laws then there wouldn't be as much problems. Gun shootings are the main reason why the kill rate is going up. That being the main cause is just something we need to stop. Gun laws are causes of violent crime in the world and it must need to be changed for people to buy guns easier to protect themselves.Gun control will help everyone in the world because it would make the world way safer.If there were more gun control laws enacted the world would be a safer place because more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. Guns are rarely used in self defense and The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason gun control may not work is because if we take away guns, people will find ways to smuggle them from other states and countries, but it will also give killers more choices on what weapons they can use; whether that be a baseball bat, a sledgehammer, or a…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays