Preview

Gun Control vs. Crime Rate

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control vs. Crime Rate
Jessica Vickers
Dr. Jonne Akens
Engl 1302
25 February 2013
Gun Control vs. Crime Rate According to the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” In this very amendment lies the main issue of gun control. “To many, the language of the amendment appears to grant to the people the absolute right to bear arms. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the amendment merely protects the right of states to form a state militia.” (Kimberlin) Gun control, or the controlling of firearms, is any act or proposal by any local, state, or federal agency to inhibit, deter, or prohibit the possession of firearms by any law abiding U.S. citizen. Some believe that by controlling the people’s possession of firearms, the violent crime rate will decrease. However, this is not the case. The controlling of firearms, also known as an infringement of the second amendment, is irrelevant to the reduction of violent crime. Instead, further investigation into the criminals’ motives and state of mind will better resolve the rate of crime in our country. The Second Amendment is a mere twenty-seven words long. However, both campaigns of the gun control debate obtain such different interpretations from those words. “The gun-control campaign interprets the Second Amendment as if it is specifically referring to militias. The Gun-rights supporters say all the other amendments focus on individual rights, as does ““2A.”” The Second Amendment helps protect what is promised in the other nine and that it is a line the government is forbidden to cross.” (Kimberlin) Kimberlin also states that, “not many nations have firearms enshrined into their constitutions, but in 1789 the Founding Fathers thought that guns were important enough to deserve one of 10 amendments that make up the Bill of Rights.” If the possession of guns



Cited: Kimberlin, Joanne. "The Second Amendment: two interpretations." Virginian Pilot. 02 03 2008: n. page. Web. 3 Mar. 2013. Wicked, Joe, ed. "Does Gun Control Reduce Violent Crime?" Cold Dead Hands. Cold Dead Hands, 30 Jan 2013. Web. 2 Mar 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most highly debated amendments of the United States Constitution is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has been disputed for hundreds of years on exactly of its exact true meaning. The United States Constitution wrote the Second Amendment as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is one of the most debatable topics in present day. Gun control refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. These firearms include handguns, machine guns, rifles etc. People use these weapons for multiple reasons. Some use it for sport, for example: hunting or practicing at the gun range. Others buy it for protection while others use it for violence. Having a firearm requires responsibility. The person that wields a gun is responsible for his safety or others. They are also responsible for using a weapon against someone. According to procon.org, ''The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only through the blatant abrogation of explicit constitutional rights is gun control even possible. It must be enforced with such violations of individual rights as intrusive search and seizure and the most severely victimizes those who most need weapons for self-defense. With various gun control proposals on different agendas with the including of licensing, waiting periods, and bans on “Saturday night specials” are of little or if any value as crime-fighting measures because with the banning of guns to reduce crime makes more logic as banning alcohol to reduce drunk driving and with the persuasive evidence shows that civilian gun ownership can be a powerful deterrent to…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes the solution to a problem is far out of reach and attempting to change what is not looking for change is not the answer. Over the years, controversy developed that contemplates upon the interpretation of the amendment and whether or not it should be abolished and has formed two sides of support: those for the Second Amendment and those against it. Those against the…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    More Gun Control or Less?

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: GOLDBERG, JEFFERY. “THE CASE FOR MORE guns (AND MORE GUN CONTROL).” Atlantic Monthly (10727825) 310.5 (2012): 68-78. Academic Search Premier.Web. 3 Mar. 2013.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control vs. Gun Rights

    • 1529 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From reading the Stencel book, I have learned for the first time that the Second Amendment was not just the right to bear arms. The Stencel book tells us that the Second Amendment really states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to…

    • 1529 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Research

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the most controversial issues in our society is gun control regulation. Gun control refers to restrictions or limits on possession, production, importation, shipment, sale, and/or guns by private citizens. There is an extreme amount of violence associated with guns that is increasing every year. Back in history when gun control laws and the second amendment was created, they didn’t have the huge fright that Americans have today of people constantly killing other people every day. Though, some people feel that it isn’t guns that kill people, it is the peoples fault. There are many questions that arise concerning who should be able to own guns and how those guns are obtained.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the Constitution says, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Analysis of this clause varies depending on how one wants to interpret. For example, someone who views the amendment with the original intent of the framers’ might view the amendment as the states being able to rise up against the possibility of tyranny. If the president dispersed Congress and take away the State’s voice and choice to pass their own laws, that would be tyranny, and a state militia would be able to rise up against it with the weapons they were allowed to have. To a person who wants to read it as the amendment is written, the right to own guns should not be infringed because citizens need a well-regulated militia to protect our liberties. The difference is that the protection against tyranny is not implied in this belief. Critics believe that the Constitution should be read and interpreted as Americans now. To which, a well regulated militia is not what citizens have. Even though citizens can have certain high powered and high magazine…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The implementation of the second amendment serves as a means to protect oneself against governmental tyranny. Gun ownership gives citizens the power to check governmental and police abuses. Due to increased violation of this very amendment citizens have allowed for the second amendment to be under scrutiny for further adjustments. Why should certain rights be under stricter governmental control without completely taking those rights away? People who abuse those rights make it difficult for the law abiding citizens to lead lives with less fear. Stricter laws and regulations will decrease the number of crimes. A survey taken in 2010 shows that Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms. As of 2012 neighborhoods have seen an increase in crime rates in the States that allow for concealed permit handgun holders. A recent incident involving two neighbors involved in a shooting where both individuals were killed by the other in a confrontation. Both had the right to carry a concealed weapon and both died by that same right. To improve on such happenings such as this, government laws and restrictions will bring down if not take away incidents such as these where people are not only misusing their rights but making it…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays