Preview

Gun Control Is Bad

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1033 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Is Bad
Gun control laws should not be strengthened, instead they should be enforced. Instead of making it harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain guns, guns should be taken away from unstable individuals or people who should not have guns like criminals. The first reason why gun control should not be strengthened is that citizens have the right to own guns; it is one of those entitlements that makes the United States different from other countries. Secondly, criminals are criminals and that is why they are called criminals, they don’t follow the law; basically if a criminal wants a gun they will get a gun, legally or not. My third reason is that guns are used for protection. Strengthening gun control laws will not prevent violence, guns aren’t the only tool used to hurt people, and people will use other objects to hurt people if they can’t have guns. Without a gun, murderers will still murder people whether they use a gun, knife, baseball bat, or any other object, it doesn’t matter. If not that many citizens have guns thanks to stronger gun laws, what if the government becomes tyrannical or does not protect the citizens’ rights? Well they won’t be able to do anything because they will be helpless, they can’t take out the leaders and fix the government. The second amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Adolf Hitler took away guns from the Jewish people during his reign of power in Europe, the constitution states that guns are “necessary to the security of a free state” and Hitler did not want a free state, he did not want them to fight back. Same goes for Fidel Castro and other leaders like them. Guns are necessary to for the people to have, to make sure the government is kept in line. The founding fathers wanted citizens to be able to own guns to make sure that the people are in charge. Thomas Jefferson said, “When the people fear the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce violent crimes. Both sides of the issue has opinions, facts and statistics that support their claims. However, I still stand firm in my conviction for stricter guns laws. I believe the pros definitely out weight the cons. Stricter guns laws should include more comprehensive background checks to include gun owners and anyone who has access to the guns, longer waiting periods, and evaluations for mental illness and depression.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (2) Federal law already prohibits certain people from owning firearms: those with certain kinds of criminal records or mental illness; drug addicts; immigrants without legal status; veterans who left the military with a dishonorable discharge; and anyone with a permanent restraining order keeping them from a partner or a partner’s children. So with this already in action, do we really need more gun control? Now we are discussing needing a background check on every person and taking away a big portion of guns, but clearly, we won’t be needing…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.Gun control laws don't deter crimes, gun ownership deters crime. In the twentieth-century weapon, ownership had doubled but the murder rate has decreased. Anyone can go buy a gun but that doesn't mean they're going to use…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Gun Control Is Bad

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun Control is good because it can prevent any robberies or any other kind of crime. Another reason gun control is good because age’s that are not 18 or older could not buy a gun without their identity to show if they are old enough to buy a gun to prevent that child or young adult to get hurt.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Gun Control is a broad term that covers any sort of restriction on what kind of firearms can be sold and bought, who can possess or sell them, where and how they can be stored or carried, what duties a seller has to vet a buyer, and what obligations both the buyer and the seller have to report transactions to the government. This law is basically made for white American men, like most laws are. According to Gunsfreedom.com, “The Federal government started its gun control policies in response to the waging wars of the gangs in 1934 with the National Firearms Act of 1934.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that gun control is a bad thing, and this is why there could be rioting if you take guns away. Also, I know people that make a living by buying parts for guns and put them together. I also know people that buy guns from them. So, sofar gun control can cause destruction and a way to make a living gone. If police officers still carry guns, then a robber could knock out a cop and take the gun. Also, if someone is robbing you than what can you do go for a baseball bat, or a knife, or any melee weapon or run away as fast as you can. On the plus side you can shoot a gun for fun, or to hunt. There are some people that rely on guns to put food on the table. There are also people that teach gun safety…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Contrary to what many people may have seen on bumper stickers, gun control does not refer to using two hands. The legal definition of gun control is: having laws that aim to restrict or regulate the sale, purchase, or possession of firearms through licensing, registration, or identification requirements. A large number of American households or residents, approximately 40-45% of them, own at least one firearm (Agresti, James, and Smith, Reid). No matter how you look at it guns have, and will always be, around; whether they are used in the military or for personal use. However, many people have lost interest in gun activities, such as hunting and target…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control is a very large problem going on in the United States today. All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be used with precautions, as well as the right safety regulations. Guns can be hazardous and tragic accidents can happen, like the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut, but only if they are in the hands of the wrong person. Guns are not only used every day for protection, such as law enforcement like the military and the police, but guns are also used for recreational activities such as hunting. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, which also means we have the right to own a gun to protect ourselves and our families not only from criminals, but also from the government. So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct. I believe gun control in the United States should not necessarily be eliminated, but reduced greatly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson one of our founding fathers once said that “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms only disarm those who are neither inclined or determined to commit crimes”. Gun control laws have been around since the 1800’s ,with the fist law coming into play in 1870.That first law about firearms stated that you would need a license if you wished to carry your firearms outside of your own home and property. Then in the 1900’s a law passed to help insure the safety of other. That law passed in 1903 and it stated that firearms could not be sold to the drunken or the mentally insane and unstable. Evidence has proven that more gun control laws would not be beneficial to the public and would not help reduce the amount of violent crimes being committed with guns.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Wrong

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun Control. This has been a divisive topic for centuries, ever since the creation of guns in the late 1700’s. Many people see guns as their right and often point to the 2nd Amendment in the U.S, which gives all people and groups such as the NRA, the right to carry guns no matter what happens. This is a right which has been laid out and given to all Americans, along with freedom of speech, religion, the press, etc. But on the other hand, in the wake of mass shootings which have now become a trend across the U.S, and rising crime rates following the biggest jump in murder rates from 2015 to 2016, many advocates are supporting increased gun control rates, saying that the times are changing, and that while people should still carry guns, people…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays