Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Gun Control

Better Essays
1429 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." What does the second amendment to the Constitution to the United States really mean? Does every citizen have the right to own a gun? Should there be limitations on who can possess a gun? Gun right advocates believe they have the right to possess a gun without restrictions. Gun Control advocates on the other hand support more limitations on the accessibility of guns and also want to ban certain types of guns. They argue that the more guns there are the more crime there will be. Is either one of these arguments justified? Which party is right in their interpretation of the second amendment? Those in favor of the right to have possession of a gun say they have a gun for protection, and that guns do not cause more deaths. These advocates of gun rights use the fact that Switzerland with very little restraints on guns has very little crime. "Switzerland, through its militia system, distributes both pistols and fully automatic assault riffles to all adult males and requires them to store their weapons at home. Further, civilian long-gun purchases are essentially unregulated, and handguns are available to any adult without a criminal record or mental defect. Nevertheless, Switzerland suffers far less crime per capita then the United States an almost no gun crime" (Kopel 2002). Gun rights activists say that "Guns do not turn ordinary citizens into murderers" (Kopel 2002) Studies have established that less then one gun owner in 3,000 commits murder, and that one killer is far-flung from being a classic gun holder. Studies have also found that "two-thirds to four-fifths" of homicide offenders have previous arrest records (Kopel 2002). Every month the NRA magazine publishes a section called "The Armed Citizen." The section is full of newspaper clippings about citizens who have successfully defended themselves against a crime. For Example, one of the stores featured in the magazine was about a man, who is in a wheelchair, who had been beaten and robbed in five break-ins over the past two months. One night when the man heard prying at his window he fired a shotgun, and wounded the burglar and scaring him off (Kopel 2002). This is just one success story from owning a gun. There are however many disadvantages to self-defense with a firearm. The gun control advocates focus on this these aspects of the gun. Self-defense is the most common reason for owning a gun. Research has shown that a gun kept within a house is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the family, a friend, and rather then an intruder. Dr. Arthur Kellermann and Dr. Donald Reay published this following information in The New England Journal of Medicine: "A study of 743 gunshot deaths found that 84 percent of these homicides occurred during altercations in the home. Only two of these 743 gunshot deaths occurring in the home involved an intruder killed during an attempted entry, and only nine of these deaths were determined by police/courts to be justified" (Jason 2002). Approximately eleven percent of gun owners and about thirteen percent of handgun owners use their firearms for protection (Gun Control 2002). Guns were a major cause of accidents. In 1995, firearms were responsible for 1.5 % or 1,400 fatal accidents. They were responsible for 2.7% or 181 of accidents that involved children under 14. There were 259 fatal firearm accidents for teenagers between the ages of 15 and 19 (Gun control 2002). Dr. Roth, a research director in Bethesda Maryland, says " In short, people are not always thinking rationally, and when there is a gun around, it is easier for an irrational person to do greater damage" (Jason 2002). Guns are used as the primary weapon in many crimes. In 1989, approximately 60 percent of all murder victims were killed with guns (Jason 2002). In the United States during 1997, 15,289 murders were committed. Out of these murders, the perpetrators used a firearm in 10,369 of the instances. Also in 1997, people committed 7,927,000 violent crimes. Out of these crimes a gun was used in about 691,000 times (Gun control 2002). Because of these accidents of self-defense or neglect and the number of crimes committed with guns, gun control advocates feel that many precautions need to be taken before anyone can own a weapon. The Brady Bill established on February 28, 1994 establishes a 5 day waiting period on handgun purchases when bought through a licensed dealer. It also requires that local authorities do a background check on handgun purchasers. Since the implementation of the Brady Bill, the number of violent crimes committed by firearms has fallen 25% as of 1997 (Gun Control 2002). Gun control advocates also feel that people who own guns should attend gun education classes (Jason 2002). In 1988, the NRA developed a gun safety program for school kids from pre-k through 6th grade. As of 1998, the program has reached nearly 10 million children. The goal of this program of course is none other then to teach children what to do if they should come across a firearm. The kids are taught to "Stop, Don 't touch. Leave the area. And tell an Adult" (Gun control 2002). Since 1998, 37,00 National Rifle Association instructors and coaches have conducted safety and proficiency programs that have reached nearly 70,000 participants in a single year. The NRA has three gun safety rules. One, always keep the gun pointed in a safe direction (whether loaded or not). Two always keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to fire. And last but not least, always keep the gun unloaded until you are ready to use it (Gun control 2002.) Handgrip ID tagging is also on the list for gun control. This technology is still in the future, but it would be a good goal to work at. The theory for this is that each gun is "registered" to one-person palm print (the legal purchaser of the gun), and only that person can fire that gun. If by chance another person tries to fire, the gun simply will not fire. This will make stolen guns useless, and in turn people can not be harmed by anyone other then the gun owner himself (Jason 2002). This in turn will help the justice system a lot more. There would be no more mistakes on people being wrongfully accused of a crime they did not commit. In conclusion, I am not against the right to own a gun. I just feel that gun control laws should be stronger. For instance, I know that when you go to a gun show in many states you can just go in and buy a gun. There is not waiting period and there is not background check. This makes it easier for criminals to get hold of a gun. I also feel that after you 've had a background check and are approved to own a firearm that you attend safety classes. Before my brother, age 15, could get a hunting license or permit he had to attend gun safety classes. These classes are extremely important. He learned things that may someday save his life. After doing this paper I noticed that many of the people opposed to gun control like the NRA, are actually helping the cause of gun control. For instances, the NRA goes to schools and teaches about gun safety and also has class for people to attend about precautions and safety. Attending one of these classes is a big part for the gun control advocates. So in a way the NRA is helping out gun control, even though they don 't believe in it. To sum things up, I feel that gun control is greatly need in today 's society. There are too many people getting hurt or dying because of firearms. We need to set stricter limits on who can own a gun. We also need to have stricter sentences on imprisonment and the death penalty. If we as a nation really crack down on gun control, I feel, the number of deaths (either by accident of murder) will decrease drastically.

References

(2002, April 9) Gun control. http://www.justfacts.com/gun_control.htm Jason. (2002, April 29). A case for gun control. http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~zj5j-gttl/guns.htm Kopel, D. (2002, April 29). Trust the People: The Case Against Gun Control. http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pal09.html

References: (2002, April 9) Gun control. http://www.justfacts.com/gun_control.htm Jason. (2002, April 29). A case for gun control. http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~zj5j-gttl/guns.htm Kopel, D. (2002, April 29). Trust the People: The Case Against Gun Control. http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pal09.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Every day the use of guns is acquired throughout the world. The big question on everyone 's mind is "Would Tighter Gun Control Laws Save Lives?" Both sides of the debate have valid arguments. Just look at the interesting statistics. In Washington, D.C., a city-wide gun ban was implemented in 1976. Immediately following the gun ban the murder rate increased, and for the next 15 years Washington was either first or second, nationally, in murder rate (Levy, 2008). According to the BBC News, handgun crime in the United Kingdom rose by 40% in the two years after it passed its draconian gun ban in 1997. The statistics show the bigger picture from each side of the argument. The pro argument is that gun control will save lives. The con of the argument is that gun controls will not save lives. The evaluation of ethical, moral, and legal issues is identified in relation to gun controls. The team identifies the more persuasive argument along with a reflection of team consensus. The weaker and stronger arguments are established to determine the awareness of gun control…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    citizens feel that the Second Amendment is necessary and is still relevant today. The supporters of the amendments have claimed that having the right to bear arms provides them with a sense of security and safety. As supported by 2001 National Gun Policy Survey of the National Opinion Research Center conducted by Tom W. Smith, “Most gun carries indicate that they feel safer carrying a handgun (59%). “ This 59 percentage of people feels that carrying a gun with them gives them a sense of satisfaction in terms of their safety. However, a more recent study has contrasted this survey with the support of events that take place everyday. According to the study conducted by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, “Members of the public who carry guns risk escalating everyday disagreements into public shootouts, especially in places where disputes frequently occur—in bars, at sporting events, or in traffic.” This demonstrates the risk caused by the Second Amendment as it creates dangers for the people. The availability of guns or the right to bear arms has made the public areas a danger for everybody. As the study reports, people carrying guns have utilized the advantage of using them for their benefits in small arguments resulted by disagreements. An example that verifies this study is the incidents that too place in 2014, where a retired police officer who carried a legal concealed handgun murdered a man for a mere disagreement. The officer shot…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some gun advocates claim that they carry guns as a form of self-protection. However, this has been scientifically proven to be untrue. A study done by the University of Pennsylvania on the 677 shootings over the span of two and a half years indicate that people who carry guns are 4.5 times more likely to be shot than an unarmed person, and 4.2 times more likely to be killed by a gun (Callaway). The author claims that the reason for these statistics is that guns give people false senses of empowerment that make them overreact in volatile situations (Callaway). Carrying a gun not concealed is like painting a bull’s-eye(s) on oneself rather than self-defense, especially when it might foster delusions of empowerment. Even statics discourage gun possession; through legislating stricter gun laws, this can ensure public…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Amidst all the raging debates regarding gun control, it is important to evaluate the issue from the perspective of the role that guns play in the lives of citizens. Crime has been on the rise in several American states. The rising cases of homicide in the past few years have prompted several states to implement stringent gun control laws that restrict purchase and possession of firearms by civilians. The American constitution allows civilians to own firearms for their own protection. However, this is not the main argument why gun control should not be allowed. This argument supports the need for Americans to protect themselves and their families. America does not need gun control but stringent policies that address the causes of gun misuse (Lott 83).…

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, when have criminals been a type of people to abide by the law; by definition a criminal is one who will break the law. Statistics support this assertion, 37.4% of prison inmates who used, carried, or possessed a firearm when they committed the crime for which they were serving their prison sentence obtained the gun from a family member or friend (Planty, Truman 2013). Furthermore, to advocate for gun control is also to advocate removing firearms from law abiding civilians, who could need weapons for self-defense, which happens about 2.5 Million times a year (NRA, 2014). Likewise, a survey of convicted felons found that 48% admitted that they avoided committing crimes when they knew the victim was armed (Write, Rossi, 1985). This evidence further supports the view-point that criminals are less likely to endanger themselves when committing crimes, therefore, citizens should be armed. Policies should not remove the most basic right to self protection in dire…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Luo, Michael. “Felons Finding It Easy to Regain Gun Rights.” U.S. The New York Times, November 13, 2011. Web. October 6, 2012.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns are rarely used in self-defense. In 2010, for every “justifiable homicide”, there were 36 criminals ones. It is proven that the simple presence of a firearm makes any violent dispute more likely to become fatale. A woman is 500% more likely to be murdered in a domestic dispute if a gun is present. The equation is simple: more gun = more…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in our Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals. (Halbrook 65-84)…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the political realm, weapons are a huge controversial topic, guns in particular. The Sullivan Act, was the first piece toward gun reformation and was passed in 1911 for New York State. The law required anyone who carried a small firearm to have a permit. This piece of legislation is still in effect today.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Control

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For American citizens, the right to bear arms is granted to us in the United States constitution. The constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (CITE). However, guns have changed dramatically since the constitution was written. Now, guns have the capacity to kill more people, quicker than ever before. And far too often, guns are not used for protection or self-defense, but to intentionally harm the innocent. For this reason, political figures, social activists and members of the general public have called into question what is really outlined and protected under the 2nd amendment. For example, are all guns permitted,…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States’ Constitution, specifically the Second Amendment, states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. This statement gives the citizens the right to bear arms, because they as people can be a part of a “well regulated Militia”, that is imperative to the “security of a free state”. Does this statement still hold firm, or does it not? Personally, I believe that there should be a tight control on the sales and distribution of guns in the country, as they are a threat to human lives.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    New England Journal of Medicine researchers Wintemute, Braga, and Kennedy (2011) stated “in 2007, a total number of 12,632 people in the United States were murdered with firearms, and it is estimated that another 48,676 were treated in hospitals for gunshot wounds received In assaults.” One of the main reasons that numbers associated with gun violence are so high is because guns are falling into the hands of people who should not have them. If we can prevent criminals from acquiring guns, we can drastically reduce gun violence. If someone wishes to buy a gun in the United States, he or she will do so in one of two ways. The first method is through a federally licensed dealer; all sales through a licensed dealer are regulated by the government. They are well-documented, and include screenings and background checks. Private-party sales are the second method. They are not illegal, but they are a major problem. They are completely unregulated and undocumented because they can be anonymous and undocumented; private-party sales are the obvious choice for criminals. Wintemute et al. (2011) reported, “Some 85% of all guns used in crimes and then recovered by law-enforcement agencies have been sold at least once by private parties.” This statistic shows that all gun sales should be required to go through a licensed dealer because private sales are unregulated, and they do not require background checks, which is why private sales provide easy access to guns for criminals.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Law

    • 2979 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Spitzer, Robert J. The Politics of Gun Control. 4th. Washington D.C. : CQ Press, 2008. Print.…

    • 2979 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays