Preview

Gun Control

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1780 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control
In the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment in the Constitution reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”(Bill of Rights) There are many effects and Consequences of Gun Control. The right for of all Americans to bear arms is a right even the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Whether or not gun control laws work, the fact of the matter is that these kind of laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they increase the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence, I think would ultimately fail.
I am not against gun control, just the current law being proposed. All Americans, including gun owners, support responsible gun laws which keep criminals from buying guns. But just because a law is passed, doesn 't mean that every person that owns a gun wants more laws. That couldn’t be further from the truth. The reason I choose this topic is because gun control is a very controversial topic going on in the United States and also around the world. Gun control has been an issue for a long time in history. Given the previous experiments of gun control around the world, a good example of this would be with Adolf Hitler in Germany, Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union, or with Fidel Castro and Cuba. It makes no sense to me why people would want to give up their constitutional right because they believe in the



Bibliography: "Bill of Rights Transcript Text." Bill of Rights Transcript Text. 23 Apr. 2013 . "Florida State College Of Criminology & Criminal Justice." Gary Kleck : Florida State University College of Criminology & Criminal Justice. 23 Apr. 2013 . Wheeler, Timothy. "Public Health Gun Control: A Brief History." "85% Of Cops Say Gun Control Is Useless, Detrimental." Infowars 85 Of Cops Say Gun Control Is Useless Detrimental Comments. 23 Apr. 2013 . "Welcome Police Officers & Law Enforcement to the #1 Resource for Cops - Tuesday, April 23, 2013." Police Officers, Cops & Law Enforcement. 23 Apr. 2013 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is also supported by the U.S. Supreme Court which said, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” This quote shows how altering the laws would be the opposite of what the Second Amendment states. Also according to the Declaration of Independence, our unalienable rights are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and, “that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it... it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This means that whenever we are in perilous situation we can defend ourselves to secure our right of life. Also, “banning guns will take away yet another piece of our liberty,” according to balancedpolitics.org. Eventually this will lead to having more of our rights taken away and result in tyranny. This is why we must not alter the gun laws we have…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control: Pros And Cons

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not many people choose to look at the actual statistics of deaths or injuries caused by firearms. There was a saying that I heard once, “Guns do not fire themselves, people fire guns”. Out of all the statistics, you are most likely to get killed in a car accident, than you are getting shot by an actual gun. I have stated all the facts that I have researched, now I would like to state my opinion of this topic since that is also part of an actual discussion. Reading these articles and seeing the opinions of other people has opened my eyes a bit. I personally live with two avid hunters, and not once has there been any kind of gun related accident in or around my home. I think some of these laws are quite ridiculous, and that they are mainly there to try and control people’s right to bare arms. I do not understand why gun control is a bigger issue than trying to help children who have no home or families to care for them. The pro about having certain laws in place for guns are that it keeps people from going overboard and overdoing certain things like hunting for wild game. A con is that it intentionally make it impossible to protect yourself in certain situations. I would whole heartedly bet that if a person was being held at gun point and they did not have a gun, that they themselves would want one at their side. A gun can, yes, take a life. But it can also save lives, the…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Cons

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control has sparked quite a controversy over the years. Some people believe that having strict gun control is the only way to fix the problems. While others, including myself, believe it is more a problem with the person that is behind the trigger. There has been laws about gun control as early as 1934. as citizens, we need to ask ourselves if having gun control will solve all the issues at hand. With both arguments, there is facts to support. I believe that gun control will not have the ability to make all the problems go away, there needs to be more done.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have a natural right with the Second amendment. Nelson Lund, a Professor at George Mason University School of Law, once stated how, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life and many gun control laws interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Gun Control - ProCon). People have a right to safety, and a right to defend themselves. Many citizens acknowledge and defend this right. By implements stricter gun laws the only thing being done is taking away some people's ability to defend themselves against others who won't follow any laws put into place. This walks hand in hand with the second amendment, which “protects an individual’s right to own guns” and states that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders. Along with the fact that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime (Second Amendment). America was built upon freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and even the freedom to own guns and protect oneself from whomever may pose a threat. Bad people with guns can only be fought against by good people with the same abilities to have guns. Along with this the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense (Second Amendment). The second amendment is not the only amendment that protects a humans right to bear arms, here are other amendments this country was built upon that protect an american's right to protect…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control is a very large problem going on in the United States today. All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be used with precautions, as well as the right safety regulations. Guns can be hazardous and tragic accidents can happen, like the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut, but only if they are in the hands of the wrong person. Guns are not only used every day for protection, such as law enforcement like the military and the police, but guns are also used for recreational activities such as hunting. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, which also means we have the right to own a gun to protect ourselves and our families not only from criminals, but also from the government. So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct. I believe gun control in the United States should not necessarily be eliminated, but reduced greatly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control laws take away a person’s right to self-defense and take away their feeling of safety. The 2nd amendment allows people to feel safer. Less guns for protection will create an increase of homicides. States that don’t support the 2nd amendment have a higher murder rate, then a state that supports the 2nd amendment. Guns aren't the problem, people are the problem. Legally owned guns are frequently stolen and used by…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Gun Control Necessary

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All around the united states gun control is a big thing for criminals and modern day folks like,i'm gonna give you some evidence to show you why gun control laws are not necessary. People now days need guns to protect themselves from the awful environment. that gun control laws would "give too much power to the government over the people. People should not have to worry about the government overriding us. People die every day from natural causes more than gun killings.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson one of our founding fathers once said that “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms only disarm those who are neither inclined or determined to commit crimes”. Gun control laws have been around since the 1800’s ,with the fist law coming into play in 1870.That first law about firearms stated that you would need a license if you wished to carry your firearms outside of your own home and property. Then in the 1900’s a law passed to help insure the safety of other. That law passed in 1903 and it stated that firearms could not be sold to the drunken or the mentally insane and unstable. Evidence has proven that more gun control laws would not be beneficial to the public and would not help reduce the amount of violent crimes being committed with guns.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws can reduce violence and crime. In the United States, 67% of crimes in 2010 were committed with firearms (Rogers, 2007). This means that majority of crimes committed in America had guns and other firearms involved. If firearms are prohibited in the state, then in theory, crime rates will go down by 67%. Guns have the ability to take someone’s life. Having that said, disallowing the use of guns can not only decrease crime rates, but lower causalities as well.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper discusses and is centered around the on-going debate over gun control, I directly address how each major political party views this subject and what I believe the United States Government should do to be able to best combat this tremendous issue. I use research from multiple sources that contrast each side of the argument and give an overall insight into the world of modernized gun control.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays