Preview

Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
917 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control
If guns were controlled by government, will it help to reduce the violent crime in the U.S.A? Recently, I have been searching "gun control" on the internet in order to understand more about it to finish this research paper. Gun control is a kind of law or things like a policy to limit the production, sale or use of guns by people. This law or policy is very greatly around the entire world. In my country, only polices and those security guards can have the permission to use guns. But still, they have to return it when they are off duty; on one can truly owns a gun. I was shocked when I found out that people in any places of America can own guns and take it to everywhere they want to as I've never seen that in my own country before. I bet or everyone would know that the world would be horrible and uncontrollable without this policy for as if people can owe a gun whenever they want, crime rate would definite increase, and there would be more shootings occur. Is gun control a good thing or a bad thing? Some people think that having guns equals to bad, without guns equal to good. People they that keeping guns are for protection, in case there's some criminals rob them, they could at least have some weapons to protect themselves. However, the most fervent supporters of gun rights would agree that a modicum of control is acceptable, such as prohibiting violent felons a d mentally ill persons possessing guns. But gun control takes very expensive licensing, consists of convolutes regulations, and is based on poorly thought-out, arbitrary decisions of bureaucrats. In criminal's perspective, it's wonderful, but for a law-abiding citizen, not so much. In addition, for I've curtly mentioned, I grew up in a non-gun environment in Hong Kong. I have never seen a gun in my entire life except on TV and in movies, so Hong Kong's crime rate and shooting rate are obviously less the America. Almost everyone, including people on the political centre-right like my family believed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A person for gun control might say that violence will decrease with the gun control law enforced. Gun violence in America is off the chart compared with every other country on the planet. “The gun-homicide rate per capita in the U.S. is 30 times that of Britain and Australia, 10 times that of India and four times that of Switzerland.” Yes that is true, but do you think that gun control laws will really stop people from obtaining guns? The main problem with the gun-control laws is that they don’t work. “Florida State University criminology professor Gary Kleck, a political liberal and one-time supporter of gun-control laws, has been studying guns and their effect on violence and crime since 1976. What he’s found is that gun-control laws have no net effect on violence or crime rates, because the benefits of widespread gun ownership cancels out the costs.”…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    control throughout the nation means violating a person’s Constitutional rights. Although some people feel that the issue of gun control will limit crime, the issue should not exist due to the fact that guns are necessary for self defense against crime, and by enforcing gun control is violating a citizens second amendment right to bear arms…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control Since the days of the pioneers of the United States, firearms have been part of the American tradition as protection and a means of hunting or sport. As we near the end of the 20th century the use of guns has changed significantly. Because of fast and steady increase in crime and the fight for the right to own a hand gun, the introduction of legislation for gun control, to try to reduce the crime in the United States, has been a hotly debated issue in recent years. Although many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people, given in the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of guns and gun owners is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. Many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people given in the second amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and registered for the American public there is a threat to the personal safety of American families everywhere. However controlling the sale and distribution of firearms is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns. In 1988 there were 9000 handgun related murders in America. Metropolitan centers and some suburban communities of America are setting new records for homicides by handguns. Larger Metropolitan centers have ten times the murder rate of all Western Europe. For example in Washington,D.C. there was an estimated 400 homicides including guns. In addition gun control has been seen as necessary because of the violence…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has been a proven fact that the states with stricter gun control have increased the crime rate by a lot. That is happening because some people still have guns and the government are disarming everybody else which makes it easier to rob store gas stations and banks. “Although guns killed 35,957 people in 1995 the guns didn’t pull the trigger people did.”(Schmittroth 3) Most of those killings were from having gun control. If we got rid of gun control it would reduce the amount of crimes that go on in the United States. Most of the guns in the United States protect lives more than they take lives. But that only happens when there is no gun control. And handguns are perfect for women to keep in there purse to have for self-defense. But the government is trying to pass gun control which will leave most of the women defenseless. Which bad thing is that approximately 200,000 women in the United States use guns to protect themselves from sexual crimes every single year. And guns prevent more injures than they…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    No amount of laws will ever change that. This is proven by the fact that in Singapore possession of drugs is punishable by death, yet there is still drug trafficking. This also pertains to guns. Fatalities during crimes will still occur. The crime rate will not decrease. In Virginia you have to register to purchase a gun, and the rate of crimes has stayed the same. Many people die in crimes, but there are more fatalities from everyday items, such as hammers or ice picks, than there are gun fatalities. Gun control is not the solution we need to stop crime. It is inadequate and frustrating to many people. If gun control became a reality, there would be riots and uprisings all over the United States. If there were gun control laws, the riots and uprisings would increase fatalities from guns.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Thesis

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control won't stop crimes or shootings.‘’It is important for some to realize that infringing on the people's right to bear arms will not deter or stop crimes.’’ ‘’Guns are only a tool used in killing people and assisting in crimes. The real issue comes down to individuals that have guns should not. Criminals and their actions are responsible for crimes that involve guns’’ (online) www.arc.national.edu(Dustin M.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Violence Analysis

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to GunControl Pro and Con published in 2016 reported that firearms were the 12th leading cause of all deaths, representing only 1.3% of total deaths in the United States. With over 200 million firearms in the United States, and millions of legal gun ownership in the U.S., how can that many people have it wrong? If all of those people feel it is right to own a firearm, it is going to take a lot of convincing to think otherwise! Gun control laws do not deter crime. How do I know this? Well let us evaluate other countries that have implemented stronger gun laws to deter crime and death in their society, and see if it is plausible to pursue such within the United States. The United Kingdom is known for having strict gun laws, laws that strictly prohibit the possession of firearms, but according to the statistics of 2015, there were 2,034 violent crimes per 100,000 people in the UK versus 466 violent crimes per 100,000 people in the United States. And despite strict gun regulations, Europe has had 3 of the worst 6 school shootings. In Mexico, there is only one gun supplying store; the Directorate of Arms and Munitions on a secure military base, that will allow its citizens “who can provide proof of income, references, pass mental health evaluation, and pass a criminal background check to purchase a firearm. It has some of the strictest gun laws but in 2012, Mexico had 11, 309 gun murders compared to the United States that had 9,146 gun homicides.” Mexico has also enforced the regulation that only one certain kind of firearm can be purchased unlike the United States which provided an eclectic variety; yet Mexico is said to have 13.5 guns per 100 people in their own country. What do these statistics reveal? That even in countries whose government regulates the purchasing of firearms, the lengths of doing so, and the accessibility to its citizens…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    People Kill People

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gun control has been a serious issue over the past several decades, and remains a controversial topic in today’s world. As defined in Wikipedia, gun control “is any law, policy, practice, or proposal designed to restrict or limit the possession, production, importation, shipment, sale, and/or use of guns or other firearms by private citizens” (“Gun control,” 2012). To clarify its definition, gun control is a process to limit the ready availability of firearms to the citizens of their country. Every…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people believe that not everyone should be able to have access to guns mostly because people are getting killed accidentally, by crazy and by mentally ill people. But others believe that gun control will lead to gun confiscation. Then gun confiscation might lead to extermination. Nobody will be able to defend themselves. The article, “Rewriting the Second Amendment” talks about how people should have the ability to defend themselves with guns but, only for self defense. But a deal on expanding background checks is the new top goal for gun control, and Barack Obama is facing increasing pressure from many in his party to show leadership. Obama agrees to an individual's right to bear arms, in principle, but does not take it as an absolute right.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One can argue that having stricter laws can prevent easily obtaining guns and therefore, reduce gun violence. However, most criminals obtain firearms through illegal sources anyway. Also, they do not go through the whole process of registering their gun as they are criminals.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Gun control” is a phrase that means different things to different people. It has been a serious topic of debate that this author now intends to prove as being right or wrong. There is no in-between on this issue. Both sides have received adequate attention and will be treated in an objective manner.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is accepted and also frowned upon by many United States people. There is a Second Amendment gun act to help prevent any laws to be passed that involve hurting or changing the Second Amendment. Surprisingly many of the guns are being bought by only a small percentage of people. “Today two hundred sixty-five million guns are owned by only fourteen percent of the gun owners in the United States”(Turkewitz,“Today”). Too many gun control laws enforced can cause problems with the Constitution and Purchasing guns.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gun control laws have been surrounded by controversy since The Bill of Rights, including the Second amendment was passed in the congress. "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," the founders wrote. Until recently there was considerable argument over just what the founders intended by their words. Did they mean to provide only for armed units to protect us from invasion, or did they mean that each individual has a right to a gun? However, in the District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling upholding the right of individuals to bear arms for hunting and for self-defense. In the light of the Supreme Court’s hearing, the recent mass shooting incidents and growing gun related deaths across the country have called for changes and introduction of new gun related laws i.e. gun control laws to curb gun violence. In this paper I will review five main positions on the issue of gun violence in United States. First, there are those who argue that the only way to reduce gun related deaths is by making stricter gun control laws and enforcing new ones. These people believe gun related deaths can be reduced significantly by reducing the number of guns in the hands of the citizens. Second, this group argues that gun control laws are not effective means to curb gun related deaths. They argue that focus must increase crime control rather than gun control. They say less guns will not help bring the gun violence figures down. They argue for different laws to curb gun violence such as gun trafficking law. Third, this group argues that more guns will reduce gun violence. They say as gun ownership increases, criminals will be more cautious to attack and hence reducing gun related deaths. Forth, theses are the people who argue that instead of proposing new laws, whether it is to increase or to…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Upon doing research, it was unbelievable to find out how gun control can dramatically increase crime. For example, “In 1976, the Washington, D.C. City Council passed a law generally prohibiting residents from possessing handguns... During the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law was in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher while the U.S. murder rate averaged 11% lower (Agresti 2014).” This data shows strict gun laws do not prevent crime. Criminals do not care about the law and will find ways to obtain firearms. The more gun control is forced by the government, the more harm it does for law abiding citizens. Chicago’s gun ban is another prime example of the negative effects of gun control. In 1982 Chicago banned handguns, as a result the murder rate by handguns increased 40% (Agresti 2014). If I was a criminal, I would prefer my victims not to have any means of defending themselves. It would allow me to commit a crime without worry of getting shot…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays